Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., participate in a news conference on Capitol Hill  (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., participate in a news conference on Capitol Hill
(AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Opponents of President Barack Obama’s sudden move to re-establish ties with Cuba have little chance of scuttling his effort in Congress.

His initiative faces some strong resistance among lawmakers and opened fissures in both parties. Criticism came mostly from Republicans, who say the new policy rewards Cuba’s decades-long policies of repression, human rights abuses and aggression, but some prominent Democrats voiced opposition, too.

Opponents spoke of holding up money to set up a full-service U.S. embassy in Havana, blocking Obama’s nominee as ambassador to Cuba or other such steps. But even if they were to pass sweeping legislation to stop what Obama wants to do, he could veto it and they are not likely to have the votes to override a veto.

Even though the GOP will control both the Senate and House come Jan. 6, Republicans will face pressure from businesses and the farm industry — eyeing opportunities for commerce in Cuba — not to stand in the way of expanded ties.

The Chamber of Commerce spent heavily in the midterm elections, investing $35 million to elect business-minded, predominantly Republican lawmakers. Its president, Thomas J. Donohue, said Wednesday that Obama’s actions “will go a long way in allowing opportunities for free enterprise to flourish.”

The U.S. declared an embargo on most exports to Cuba in October 1960 and severed diplomatic relations in January 1961. Three months later Fidel Castro declared Cuba a socialist state — just a day before the doomed, U.S.-sponsored Bay of Pigs invasion meant to topple him. After the hard-line Castro became ill in 2006, his brother, Raul, took charge of the nation, fewer than 100 miles off the southern coast of Florida.

Now Obama says he will ease economic and travel restrictions on Cuba and work with Congress to end the trade embargo. This, after Cuba released American Alan Gross, who had been imprisoned for five years, and a Cuban who had spied for the U.S. In exchange, the U.S. freed three Cubans jailed in Florida.

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., one of three lawmakers who flew to Cuba before dawn to escort Gross home, praised Obama’s move.

Leahy, the top Democrat on the committee that oversees foreign aid, said that over the years he’s heard members of Congress tell presidents, “Hang tough on Cuba and those Castros will be out of there any day now.”

“That was said to President Kennedy, President Johnson, President Nixon, President Ford, President Carter — you see what I’m driving at,” Leahy said. “The fact is they are there. The fact is, Cuba is still there.

“Let’s start finding out ways to at least work through our differences, embrace areas where we are alike.”

Another Democrat, New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez, the outgoing chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, voiced opposition to the new Cuban policy.

Menendez, whose parents are Cuban immigrants, said Cuba is not going to reform just because Obama believes that if he extends his hand in peace, the Castro brothers suddenly will “unclench their fists.”

He said Gross committed no crime, yet was imprisoned and subjected to cruel punishment for trying to help provide Internet access to Cuba’s small Jewish community.

“Let’s be clear, this was not a humanitarian act by the Castro regime,” Menendez said. “It was a swap of convicted spies for an innocent American.”

Splits were evident on the Republican side, too.

Republican leaders in the House and Senate condemned Obama’s action, as did Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., a Cuban-American and potential presidential candidate. Rubio said the new U.S. policy would give Cuba a needed economic lift — something “the Castro regime needs to become permanent fixtures in Cuba for generations to come.”

However, Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., who also went to Cuba to accompany Gross home, said Obama’s move should not be seen as a concession. “My sense is that most of my colleagues feel that we’re long past due” in moderating the U.S. stance on Cuba.

“Certainly the policy is right and good politics usually follow good policy,” Flake said.

As well as restoring diplomatic relations, Obama plans to ease travel restrictions to Cuba for family visits, government business and educational activities, while tourist travel remains banned. Only lawmakers can revoke the trade embargo, though, and that appears unlikely to happen soon.

___

Associated Press writer Donna Cassata contributed to this report.
____________________________________________________________

Copyright © 2014 Capitol Hill Blue

Copyright  © 2014 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved

2 COMMENTS

  1. …..as do I.

    I’ve always found it odd that we Americans…you know…those of us from the “Land of the Free” can travel anywhere else on the planet…EXCEPT to Cuba.

    This includes travel to our former “arch enemies” Communist China, Russia and Viet Nam. And, lest you yammer on and on about Cuba’s horrific record on human rights, most of the latter country’s human rights records remain anything but stellar, too.

    And here’s yet another point to ponder: Despite the US government’s very best efforts to isolate and undermine it, old Fidel’s regime has managed to outlive the administrations of 10 of our US Presidents, FIVE of which have now long since DIED!

    Is that “impotence” or what?

    To put it bluntly, we’ve now become the laughing stock of the rest of the civilized world with our absolutely idiotic approach to Cuban foreign policy. It is yet another demonstration (as if any more were needed) about how the United States of America continues to project a hypocritical facade of everything that it is not, while condemning everything that it is.

    Albert Einstein once said that, “The definition of insanity is doing the same things over and over again and expecting different results.”

    So it has been with the US Government’s absolutely “insane” diplomatic approach to Cuba…for well over 50 YEARS now!

    Clearly, it’s LONG past time for all of that stupid hypocritical diplomatic nonsense to end.

  2. “Criticism came mostly from Republicans, who say the new policy rewards Cuba’s decades-long policies of repression, human rights abuses and aggression…”

    Nixon went to China. Reagan supported Gorbachev’s moves to cut back military spending and put that money into the USSR’s consumer economy. History has shown time and again that capitalism and opening trade has done more than anything else to wreck Communist governments, so if this is what Obama has in mind to do than I support it.

Comments are closed.