Because I'm an upper-class American, I often get expensive stuff for free.
For instance, last weekend my friends Melanie and Dave took me to an NBA game. We had excellent tickets with a combined face value of several hundred dollars, but we paid nothing for them because Melanie's father's girlfriend had been given the tickets by her employer (who no doubt deducted them as a business expense).
One would think the move by the nation's most elite colleges and universities to become more affordable to the middle classes would mean opportunities for tens of thousands of needy young men and women who until now had to settle for lesser institutions. One would be wrong.
How would the U.S. government be spending money if it wasn't fighting the Iraq War? Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., raised the question during Monday's Democratic presidential debate in Myrtle Beach, S.C.
"We are spending $9 billion to $10 billion every month," Obama said. "That's money that could be going right here in South Carolina to lay broadband lines in rural communities, to put kids back to school."
Is the war keeping federal money out of local communities? And if so, is the cost worth it?
As America heads into perhaps its most pivotal Presidential election in modern times candidates for the highest office in the land face an angry, disillusioned, depressed electorate that fear hard times now and see harder times ahead.
Many Americans face the coming year with sullenness and despair. Many have lost their homes as foreclosures mount. Many lost their jobs and face uncertain employment prospects for the future.
Here at Capitol Hill Blue we see that anger and darkness daily in our interaction with readers. It spills out in comments to stories, dominates discussion and touches most of the stories we print.
Many readers ask "what's the use?" In an election where "change" dominates the debate, most voters don't expect change. They see little hope from any of the candidates on either side of the political aisle.
A defense contractor hired to repair combat equipment routinely failed to do the job right and then charged the government millions of dollars for the extra work needed to get the gear ready for battle in Iraq and Afghanistan, according to a newly released audit.
Overall, the contractor's employees at Camp Arifjan in Kuwait worked about 188,000 additional hours to fix Humvees, heavy transporters and fighting vehicles that allegedly were mended but flunked a military inspection, the Government Accountability Office said.
The Bush administration's case against alleged dirty bomber Jose Padilla has sputtered to an inglorious close.
Padilla, you'll remember, was supposed to be the leader, as the U.S. attorney general himself announced, of "an unfolding terrorist plot against the United States" that featured radioactive dirty bombs and exploding apartment buildings.
Saudi Arabian women are enjoying new freedoms. Reuters recently reported that, "Saudi authorities, breaking with religious codes that require women to be accompanied by a male guardian, have decided to allow women to stay in hotels on their own."
So it begins. Earlier this month, our emperor -- a man so upbeat that he could fall down a manhole and be glad in the gloom that he didn't wear his sunglasses -- admitted that the economic situation has developed not necessarily to our advantage, or words to that effect.
Yes, that is true. Worldwide stock markets are in turmoil and Wall Street has its own convulsions. The housing market is so moribund it has a tag attached to its toes. The subprime mortgage mess hangs like a dead albatross around the necks of everyone, but especially poor people losing their homes.
Adolf Hitler was evil and perhaps a madman. But throughout history, there have been many evil madmen in many corners of the Earth. Few have attracted millions of passionate followers; fewer still have conquered Europe and committed genocide. So what made Hitler different and -- for a time -- effective?
Tired of the presidential campaign already? All those candidates, the incessant debates and speeches, the position papers, the partisan bickering, the uncertainty of it all?
You might want to give Cuba a try. Those Cubans know how to put on a seamless election.
There's no campaigning, only one party and, to really streamline the process, only one pre-approved candidate for each district. And it's all over in one day.