One thing seems increasingly clear about President Obama's ambitious plan to reform the health-care system. The nation can't afford it, and even if it could, polls show that a growing number of Americans aren't ready for reform.
A recent survey conducted by Public Opinion Strategies shows that opposition to Obama's health care proposals is virtually the same as that for President Clinton's in 1994 with 37 percent against to 25 percent in favor. Although generally connected with the Republicans, the polling organization's findings are substantially in line with that of others, including those associated with the Democrats. The poll found that opposition to the plan cuts across party lines and includes diverse interest groups like seniors, women and independents.
America gets a refresher in the lingo of labels every time senators launch an advise-and-consent ritual over a president's judicial nominee.
We learn conservatives are "strict constructionists" -- they believe the Constitution and laws should be strictly interpreted and followed. We learn liberals are "lenient activists" -- they believe sometimes it is best to interpret broadly the constitution and laws. But once the Senate approves or rejects judicial nominees, we quickly forget what we learned.
Congress is returning to Washington and President Obama's health-care overhaul is in trouble thanks in large part to the noisy misinformation spread at town-hall meetings while lawmakers were on their August recess.
The president and his team will have to fight back, and they should do so using the tactics of their opponents. And since it will be in Washington, the Democrats, who control Congress and the White House, will be playing on their home field.
Here are some tactics.
-- Make stuff up.
Just as your opponents invented negative and wholly bogus provisions supposedly in the bill, Obama should do the same, but invent good stuff.
The armed men injecting themselves into the town hall meetings on universal health care remind me why it is important to tell the thugs to go home the way Carmelita did.
There's a reason to truncate that kind of serial intimidation, whether by a government or by unregulated militias. In his book "Ringside Seat to a Revolution," David Dorado Romo brings this to light.
His great-aunt Adela told him that back in 1917, she and other working-class Mexicans who crossed the border daily from Ciudad Juarez to El Paso, were ordered off the trolley and forced by U.S. authorities to take a bath and then be sprayed with pesticides at the Santa Fe Bridge. Rumors circulated (later verified) that naked Mexican women were secretly photographed as they bathed.
Some of the people who have been appearing at town hall meetings lately say they want to take back their country. Me too.
However, I am left wondering what country they want to take back.
Because these folks are always ranting about socialism and government-run health care, I suppose if they succeed in taking back the country they will be true to their beliefs and do away with Medicare and the Veterans Affairs system, which are nothing if not government-run socialism (don't tell Granny or Pops).
With great fanfare the infamous Duggar family this week announced (on the "Today" show, no less) the upcoming birth of a 19th child.
Without engaging in histrionic gymnastics about the parents' Herculean appetite for children, I would like to use the Duggars' 19th child as a teaching moment about the environment.
The Duggars, if you haven't heard of them, are an Arkansas couple, Jim Bob and Michelle, whose ever-growing family is the subject of a cable TV series, and whose Web site gurgles with excitement about family size, and proselytizes and sells non-stop.
Among many other things (including the family's daily Biblical routine, how to buy a DVD for $19, etc.) it explains the parents' love of children thusly:
President Barack Obama is planning a George Bush-style numbers game in the increasingly-unpopular war in Afghanistan -- adding 14,000 combat troops while replacing support troops with mercenaries to make it look like the U.S. is not increasing its military presence in that war-torn country.
The plan hatched by the Pentagon and approved by the White House would put more "trigger pullers" on the ground while using private security firms to provide support and logistrics. Under the plan, the ovreall troop American troop count would not increase even though more U.S. soldiers would be put in harm's way.
"It makes sense to get rid of the clerks and replace them with trigger-pullers," one military official told the Los Angeles Times.Read More
The State Department is extending its Iraq war contract with the mercenary company Blackwater USA, now known as Xe, for an "indefinite" period that sources say could be for "weeks or months," ABC News is reporting.
Blackwater's contract, set to expire on Sept. 4, will continue until a replacement contractor, Dyncorp, can get up to speed.
Under the contract, a Blackwater subsidiary, Presidential Airways, provides air transport around Iraq for American embassy employees.
A disappointing feature of the Obama administration is its continuing support of the Bush administration's assertion of the federal government's unfettered right to snoop.
Last July, the Department of Homeland Security decreed that federal agents -- customs, immigration, border patrol -- could hold and search travelers' documents and electronic devices without a warrant or even a suspicion that something might be amiss.
This power is particularly sensitive with regard to the now omnipresent laptops that can contain immense volumes of personal information -- private e-mails, financial records, medical records, diaries, photos, addresses, proprietary business data, drafts of reports and articles.
As every school kid knows, Harry Truman instituted the doctrine of ultimate responsibility. The "buck stops here" became the symbol of strong leadership from an Oval Office where the phrase was prominently displayed on the presidential desk. Truman mainly held to that approach except now and then when he relied on something we've come to know as "plausible deniability," as had presidents before him.