With a week left, the do-nothing Congress will do nothing

By BARBARA BARRETT
McClatchy Newspapers

With less than a week before Congress begins its fall recess, Sen. Arlen Specter said he doesn’t expect much action on the terrorism interrogation bill that’s attracted so much attention.


Or on the bill regarding President Bush’s secret surveillance program.

Or on comprehensive immigration reform.

Specter, a Pennsylvania Republican and the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, sees a heavy congressional agenda but little hope for completing it this week as Republicans head home to concentrate on retaining control of the Senate and the House of Representatives in the November 7 elections.

"We’re unlikely to finish up very much, and we’ve got a lot to do," Specter said in a speech Monday at the National Press Club. "I’ve never seen so much work left to do."

All three pieces of legislation came through the Judiciary Committee, and each has met with complicated opposition and drawn-out negotiations.

On Sunday, Specter came out against the compromise on interrogating suspected terrorists that the White House finally worked out with Sen. John McCain of Arizona.

McCain and his fellow Republican Sens. John Warner of Virginia and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina argued that Bush’s initial plan might run afoul of the Geneva Conventions, which protect prisoners of war against torture. Bush has said that he wants to be able to use tough "alternative interrogation methods" to pry information from possible terrorists.

Specter opposed a clause in the compromise that, for some suspects, would remove the protections of habeas corpus, a tradition that predates the Magna Carta of 1215 and affirms that prisoners are entitled to have a court review whether they’re being held legally.

"It’s been around a long time . . . and emblazoned in the Constitution that habeas corpus can be suspended only in the event of rebellion or invasion," Specter said Monday. "We don’t have either of these now."

Specter said he’d submit an amendment to protect the courts’ authority to review the status of suspected terrorists in U.S. custody. But in response to questions, he refused to say whether he’d vote against the current compromise.

"I want to see how it shakes out," Specter said.

This also is the last week for Congress to consider immigration reform. The House last week passed legislation to build 700 miles of new fence along the U.S.-Mexico border.

Specter said he supported the fence, but he said he also thinks that the country should devise a guest-worker program and determine how to deal with the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants already living here, issues dealt with in a bill the Senate passed earlier this year.

House leaders refuse to go to conference with the Senate to hash out a more comprehensive package, Specter said.

"The House of Representatives doesn’t think much of the bicameral system," he said.

Specter said that the Senate might finish legislation this week that defines the government’s authority to monitor suspected terrorist-related phone calls.

But in all three cases, he said, it’s more important for the Senate to do the legislation right than it is to pass the bills quickly.

"I think it’s important, even in the last week, that we do it right," Specter said. "If we can’t get it done right, we ought not to do it."

5 Responses to "With a week left, the do-nothing Congress will do nothing"

  1. Bill Jonke  September 26, 2006 at 5:44 pm

    “Do nothing” is exactly what came to mind when I was apprised of the so-called agenda of Congress.

    “Doing it right” sounds like a pretty lame excuse for laziness to me.

  2. William Cormier  September 26, 2006 at 5:46 pm

    I see the matter slightly differently. There has been some key legislation on the table, the illegal immigration issue, the wiretapping issue, and especially a Bush attempt to redefine article III of the Geneva Convention that could eventually lead to out own troops being charged with war-crimes and even prosecuted for such without even seeing the evidence against them. And not to mention the potential for even more torture of the kind even we would never consider using…We have always treated our prisoners humanely – which has helped to solidify faith in the American way – even in times of war.

    I believe they are waiting for the elections – and if the Republicans do hold a majority, I believe these Bills will suddenly fly through committee, and in doing so, essentially giving President Bush a pardon for his illegal wiretapping and other crimes he has committed under his “interpretation of the constitution.” (sic)

    I’m hoping the Neo-cons got Bill Clinton riled-up enough with their attempted “Bush-whacking” of Clinton through the ABC/Disney Docudrama and the hatchet job on Faux news to get him seriously participating in the 06 and 08 elections, as he does have a much higher approval rating than Bush/Cheney combined and could help to swing the elections. It’s time to kick all of these bums out of office!

  3. Fred  September 26, 2006 at 7:05 pm

    From what I’ve seen of these bills, I’d prefer that the bills each die a slow painful death.

  4. Mark Caine  September 26, 2006 at 7:22 pm

    I have two things to say breifly here.

    All the top military intelligence people from our colleges that know what they are talking about will tell you if you torture a suspect to extract information you will not get accurate information.They will tell you whatever you want to hear just to have the interrogation stop.

    Second I saw a hearing on c-span where the judge from the 7th circuit said right there that we don’t have to do anything that is not in line with the constitution.If they need to hold suspects for longer than 48 hours they just need to get clearance from a judge to do so with a temporary order.This whole thing about changing the way habeus corpus is applied is a very dangerous precident and will lead us toward a tyrannical type of judicial system.
    I agree it is better this is done right then done to get brownie points for the election there is just way to far reaching consequenses for our country if we get it wrong.

    Mark Caine

  5. cincigal74  September 27, 2006 at 12:41 am

    What is wrong with the way we have treated detainees since the beginning of this Country?If a thing is not broken dont try to fix it.Rather fix what needs fixing,for instance our voting system.Not to mention the executive and legislative branches of this government.

Comments are closed.