You want a conspiracy? We’ve got your conspiracy


Listen up, America, and listen good. There is a conspiracy going on to boost the Bush administration and undermine large numbers of Internet bloggers and even some university professors by having you believe these people are making ding-a-ling claims about 9/11.

The conspirators — and I am pretty sure I know who you are — have somehow managed to get actors to pose as critics of the Bush administration on Web sites, in press interviews and on TV panel discussions. Instead of saying sensible things about possible mishandling of the terrorist threat, they say there is no terrorist threat. They say the downing of the Twin Towers was an inside job possibly committed by neo-conservatives, perhaps under government direction, and even that it was a cruise missile that hit the Pentagon, not a commercial jetliner.

It is clear what they are up to. By making preposterous observations that point less to a reasonable reading of reality than to a kind of psychological strangeness, they want you to think this is what all Bush critics are like — irresponsible, laughable, extreme and bizarre. The administration thereby comes out the winner, in and of itself evidence that the administration is behind this mammoth hoax.

From the beginning, these conspirators have to know that no halfway reasonable person will believe many of their claims. A missile hit the Pentagon? To have arranged that and made it seem like a commercial airliner would have required the cooperation of hundreds of vicious, anti-American people who track airline flights, cleaned up the refuse after the crash and checked all of the data after the fact. The story relies on a misunderstanding of how the crash happened and by totally misconstruing the quote of a single witness. These conspirators had to know they would be caught in this silliness, which is why they engaged in it.

Of course, some of these people — such as the 75 academics in the group called Scholars for 9/11 Truth — were a bit more sophisticated in some respects in this game they are playing. A contention of this organization is that jetliners could not possibly generate enough heat to have caused the collapse of the World Trade Center. But while that might seem plausible on the surface to the layman, these academics had to know of the voluminous studies of the nation’s top experts that the heat generated by the planes on several stories of the buildings could in fact weaken structural supports in such a way as to lead to the collapse, and they had to know that brilliant engineers would not sit idly by while they prattled on.

What some of these engineers and other experts did, in fact, was share their knowledge and understanding with writers of a book by Popular Mechanics journalists called "Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can’t Stand Up to the Facts." Not everyone is going to rush out to buy the book, but anyone with a computer can locate on the Web a Popular Mechanics magazine article that sums up the central arguments and disposes of these extreme, zany claims as if they were little more than drops of water to be shaken off a dog’s back.

These conspirators — can’t you see them chuckling? — also knew the public would catch on to their lunacy because of a major problem with their tale, something so big, bold and obvious that scarcely a dunderhead among us could miss it. That’s the fact that Osama bin Laden does not dispute his guilt and has pledged more of the same. Just the other day, the Arab TV broadcaster Al-Jazeera produced a tape supposedly showing the al Qaeda leader chatting with a number of the terrorists who hijacked the planes on 9/11.

Is it possible, though, that these conspirators are convincing the public of their absurd story, against all calculations they could not possibly do so? A survey by the Scripps Howard News Service in collaboration with Ohio University shows that more than a third of Americans believe administration officials either participated in the 9/11 attacks or let them happen in the hope this would facilitate going to war in the Middle East. The only good news here — if I may depart in my last sentence from the rhetorical device of pretending that conspiracy theorists are actually conspirators — is that two-thirds of the nation remains sane on the issue, refusing to be taken in by conspiratorial nonsense.

(Jay Ambrose, formerly Washington director of editorial policy for Scripps Howard newspapers and the editor of dailies in El Paso, Texas, and Denver, is a columnist living in Colorado. He can be reached at SpeaktoJay(at)


  1. George T.


    I don’t know what videos you’ve been watching but if you’ve seen any of the available videos of the so-called “collapse” of the WTC towers on 9/11, you’re actually watching the towers being imploded. The official play on words is very deceptive, and this simple ploy, continues to bamboozle millions. There was no “collapse” of the Twin Towers on 9/11! By the same token if any person were to just collapse where they stood, we’d fully expect to see their bodies on the ground where they once stood, wouldn’t we? Well the “bodies” of the WTC Towers should have created a mountain of rubble if they had actually just collapsed. All that was left of the Twin Towers was a lot of dust, a relatively small number of nicely cut pieces of steel, and a very deep hole! This is not the result of a “collapse” but a humongous demolition event!

    When buildings turn to dust which these builiding most certainly do, as shown by any video of the event, they’re being demolished in such a way that not much of the massive structures were left. This certainly allowed the real 9/11 perps to remove evidence, and cover their tracks at the crime scene relatively quickly. The video evidence is proof positive, there was no “collapse” but a masterfully executed controlled demolition, of the Twin Towers on 9/11.

  2. jman

    now im the kinda guy who digs conspiracies and all that, i like to research them, find there flaws and the probabilities. Im the first person who say if there was an antichrist who more likely than bush, i mean i fake a$s christian who has every gullible a$s christian( who prob knows jackshit about politics) buyin into his bs! i mean its just perfect! just because he may say hes a christian doesnt make him a good politician in the first place. AnyWAY more to the point at hand, I DO NOT BELIVE the WTC fell from a bomb, Ive seen to many videos, read to many eyewitness reports to buy into that. I mean you can plainly see the steel beems glowing bright red. It just works down to physics and enginering. You can even see the tower start to lean before it goes down. Theres even eyewitness reports ( on video and written the day of) of police men and civilians running down the stairs and exiting the building as its was comming down on them, some people were saved by the very structure underneath them, granted they were traped for 16 hours. but just because i dont belive the towers fell to a controlled demolition doesnt mean i dont belive we were behind it all, im positive we planned it, didnt even attempt to do anything about it, and even made money off of it, and are still making money off of it today in the war, either way i havent slept and im just typing to make me drowsy, anyway blah, america shouldnt suck the way its sucking right now, dammit im proud to be american and i love this country but until the damn population gets some education and quits buying the spin, its gonna be this way until we have another revolution, which woulnt be good, anarchy will not work, but we’re bearly working right now.

  3. Ted T.

    There is a VERY interesting note by a Cheri Henderson further up…
    “Like, were the buildings not quite as well protected as they could have been (making it easier for terrorist demolition experts to get in & set charges)? and could that screw up have been the reason for lying about demolition charges (security at the Towers being too lax)?”
    The controlled demolition charge is becoming TOO difficult to refute, folks.
    Let’s look for Osama’s second brigade who sneeked in and planted the explosives.

    Now, the only problem with THIS SPIN that it ignores Lucky Larry who purchased the entire WTC complex just 6 months prior to the 9/11 attacks. That was the first time in its 33-year history the complex had EVER changed ownership.

    Mr. Silverstein’s first order of business as the new owner was to change the company responsible for the security of the complex. The new security company he hired was Securacom (now Stratasec). George W. Bush’s brother, Marvin Bush, was on its board of directors, and Marvin’s cousin, Wirt Walker III, was its CEO. According to public records, not only did Securacom provide electronic security for the World Trade Center, it also covered Dulles International Airport and United Airlines — two key players in the 9/11 attacks.

    The company was backed by an investment firm, the Kuwait-American Corp., also linked for many years to the Bush family. KuwAm has been linked to the Bush family financially since the Gulf War. One of its principals and a member of the Kuwaiti royal family, Mishal Yousef Saud al Sabah, served on the board of Stratesec.

    Now, consider: The members of a small cabal owned the WTC complex, controlled its electronic security, and also controlled the security not only for one of the airlines whose aircraft were hijacked on 9/11, but the airport from which they originated.

    Another little “coincidence” — Mr. Silversten, who made a down-payment of $124 million on this $3.2 billion complex, promptly insured it for $7 Billion. Not only that, he covered the complex against “terrorist attacks”.

    Following the attacks, Silverstein filed TWO insurance claims for the maximum amount of the policy ($7B), based on the two — in Silverstein’s view — separate attacks. The insurance company, Swiss Re, paid Mr. Silverstein $4.6 Billion — a princely return on a relatively paltry investment of $124 million.

    There’s more. You see, the World Trade Towers were not the real estate plum we are led to believe. From an economic standpoint, the trade center — subsidized since its inception by the NY Port Authority — has never functioned, nor was it intended to function, unprotected in the rough-and-tumble real estate marketplace. How could Silverstein Group have been ignorant of this?

    The towers required some $200 million in renovations and improvements, most of which related to removal and replacement of building materials declared to be health hazards in the years since the towers were built. It was well-known by the city of New York that the WTC was an asbestos bombshell. For years, the Port Authority treated the building like an aging dinosaur, attempting on several occasions to get permits to demolish the building for liability reasons, but being turned down due the known asbestos problem. Further, it was well-known the only reason the building was still standing until 9/11 was because it was too costly to disassemble the twin towers floor by floor since the Port Authority was prohibited legally from demolishing the buildings.

    The projected cost to disassemble the towers: $15 Billion. Just the scaffolding for the operation was estimated at $2.4 Billion! In other words, the Twin Towers were condemned structures. How convenient that an unexpected “terrorist” attack demolished the buildings completely.

    WTC Building 7 was a part of the WTC complex, and covered under the same insurance policy. This 47-storey steel-framed structure, which was NOT struck by an aircraft, mysteriously collapsed 8 hours later that same day into its own footprint at freefall speed — exactly in the manner of the Twin Towers.

    How could this have happened? Mr. Silverstein gave the world the answer when he slipped up during a PBS television interview a year later, on 9/11/2002:
    “I remember getting a call from the…er…fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, ‘We’ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.’ And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.”
    As anyone who knows anything about construction can tell you, “Pull” is common industry jargon for a controlled demolition…

  4. Rice Farmer


    I see my original comment on this debunking article was “lost,” and I’m not going to take the time to write it over again, but I will repeat my most important points.

    First, the recent spate of articles debunking “9/11 conspiracy theories” — including this article — are part of a MEDIA BAITING CAMPAIGN to pull the debate in the direction of the physical evidence, particularly the WTC. Bush controls the physical evidence and is not going to show it to us. This baiting drags the 9/11 truth movement into endless arguments, diverting our attention and energy, which is the whole purpose. So, forget the WTC, forget the Pentagon.

    Second, we don’t need to beat our heads against the wall in debating the physical evidence, because the work of Ruppert, Griffin, and a few others have already demonstrated, using circumstantial evidence and logic applied to known facts, that Bush’s story cannot possibily be true, and that he is therefore lying. This is why the mainstream media, which are propaganda mouthpieces for the regime, keep baiting us with the physical evidence argument. Our case that Bush is lying is already made, and now it’s up to Bush to provide a story that holds water, which he cannot do.

    Third, if Jay Ambrose and others are really investigative journalists and not just cheap debunkers, they will turn their attention way from writing debunking articles and toward investigating the crucial questions.

    One crucial question is: How come the regime’s explanation about why fighters could not intercept the hijacked planes does not hold up under scrutiny even after repeated changes? See Griffin’s deconstruction of this flimsy story.

    Perhaps the most important thing for Mr. Ambrose to check out — if he’s really interested in taking up the challenge — is the WAR GAMES conducted on the morning of 9/11. The recent Vanity Fair article implied there was only one exercise, which is highly misleading. In fact, there were AT LEAST SIX war games happening on that morning. Surely these multiple, simultaneous war games paralyzed and diverted air defenses, and confused air traffic controllers, thereby allowing the “hijackings” to proceed unimpeded. Who was in overall charge of those war games? Cheney? Eberhart? Why don’t they want us to know? Check it out! Start with Ruppert’s book _Crossing the Rubicon_.

    Main points: (1) This article and the rest in this recent spate are part of a debunking campaign which uses the futile physical evidence argument to bait the 9/11 truth movement. (2) We already know that Bush is lying. Our case is made. (3) Real journalists will disengage from this cheap debunking campaign and start checking out the war games.

  5. Samuel


    It’s not possible to understand 9/11 without first understanding the nature of propaganda, and how it’s used to deceive the masses. Without such understanding, one has little chance of understanding the complex events of 9/11, or any of the other important situations the government is currently involved in.

    The 9/11 attacks were staged terror events. The government’s account of what happened on 9/11, is a complete fabrication. There were no hijackings, no hijackers, no passengers. remote controlled Aircraft of some type appear to have been used, but I wouldn’t be too concerned about them, as the aircraft were in no way, caused the loss of the WTC buildings.

    Powerful organizations with the power of life and death, have no trouble keeping people quiet if they don’t want them talking. Think of 9/11 as if it were a mafia operation. You don’t seriously think that the mafia would be concerned about anyone spilling their guts do you? That is the least of their problems. With government employees and contractors, ideological considerations and financial penalties, are usually enough to keep people quiet without resorting to extreme measures. Extreme measures are always an option if needed however and these people know this to be the case.

    WTC 7 was imploded just like the other towers. The official story fails to account for it, because there was no plane to fool the gullible masses, as with the Twin Towers. Anyone who understands the massive construction of the WTC Towers, and modern steel skyscraper construction, knows that single airliner impacts would have little or no effect on these buildings by themselves. Sure, government connected “experts” will tell you otherwise, but with them you have to understand, that as part of the cover-up, they must lie for a living, just like your average politician, and news anchor. With control of the mass media it really doesn’t matter anyway, as the masses can generally be made to believe anything they want them to, no matter how false it may be in reality.

    You may have heard how back in the 1930’s noted actor Orson Welles, was actually able to make thousands of Americans believe that Martians were attacking the U.S., via the power of a mere radio broadcast! Today the power of the media has grown exponentially. With 9/11, they’ve actually convinced millions of Americans, that the Twin Towers were brought down by a single jetliner impact apiece! A physical impossibility in the real world. The deception was pulled off for the most part, via the power of modern TV. This is even more effective than what Orson Welles did with his invasion from Mars. Both the Mars invasion via radio, and the transformation of the implosion of the Twin Towers, into a “collapse caused by jetliners” via TV, are excellent examples of the media’s power to put real thoughts, into the minds of real people, and make it stick! For this reason the real 9/11 perps had no serious worries about building 7, and the lack of a plane. They just ignored it, and majority of people don’t even know about it!

    Most people would rather go with a seriously flawed official 9/11 story, than deal with the chilling reality of a criminal federal government, plotting against them. The public’s gullibility and refusal to recognize the fact that both the government and media routinely lies to them, allows both to get away with crimes like 9/11 with impunity.

  6. Ed

    I’ve read all the comments, I’ve been keeping up on these discussions for months, and I’ve continue to try very hard to keep an open mind. Please help me: I have two simple questions and ask for simple answers that goes beyond mere “denial.”

    My first question: since i believe it’s undeniable that hundreds, actually probably thousands, of people were direct eyewitnesses (not via TV) of actual planes flying into the two Towers (witness, for example, the French filmmakers’ filming of firefighters, the camera panning up and seeing the plane fly into the tower; witness, for another example, my own son’s seeing the second plane hit as he was on the street moving away from the first tower)– with all that live witnessing, accompanied by proven retrieval of body parts and proven DNA testing/ID of people manifested to be on those planes, how can it be denied that these were real planes (not missiles, not dummy planes)with real people aboard? Second question: if your answer to the first is that yes, they were real, but part of the government complicity was the commandeering of the planes and causing all the havoc and — with that answer — the pre-planning and execution ofthe insertion of the explosives for the controlled demolition, (a) how is it that not one person has “come out” yet as being, or knowing, an individual who was involved in any aspect of this conspiracy which MUST have involved at least scores and probably hundreds of individuals of all strata and stripe and degree of I-want-fame greediness? and (b) why would they be so stupid as to arrange for WTC 7 also to be imploded without being hit by a plane if the plane impacts were, indeed, to be the alleged proximate cause for the three buildings’ collapses?

    Simple questions, i believe. Does someone have simple answers that are believeable and not patronizing?


  7. marblex

    ever wonder why atf shut down the wtc for two months after the 1993 attacks?

    Yuo, that’s the bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms….

  8. Sir.Real

    If the Bush/Cheney version of 9/11 is so correct, factual and rock solid, then there should be no problem with a thorough examination of the evidence of that day?

    We know that will never happen.

  9. Sherman

    David asks:

    Who are we to believe?

    Anyone seeking to understand 9/11 should first of all treat it like a criminal case, not a partisan political issue. 9/11 has nothing to do with “liberals” and “conservatives”, even though it’s been quite advantageous for the Bush administration to play it this way. This allows people to be steered away from the basic criminal nature of this case, and the mass of damning evidence that’s been destoyed, suppressed, or hidden away. In terms of who you believe: you believe the evidence and the evidence only. Regardless of what stories the media, and the administration and their corrupt “experts” spin, they couldn’t destroy or suppress all of the evidence in this case even thought they definitely tried. What they couldn’t destroy or hide away, they use a relentless media campaign to ridicule in an attempt to keep people locked in on their official 9/11 lie.

    Factual treatment of the full spectrum of 9/11 evidence is almost impossible to find in the mainstream media, hence it’s necessary to examine independent resources. The body of excellent independent 9/11 resources has grown so large that one should have little trouble finding one online, in print, or in DVD format. If 9/11 had been properly handled as a criminal proceeding, instead of a political football, many top players in the Bush Administration, the congress, the military, and the media, would have been more than likely, under the jail, long ago. This instead of running free today, to tell more lies, and start more useless wars.

  10. James

    Big Time Patriot,

    Many Americans are making the same mistake you’re making: Don’t confuse the “Administration” with “Federal beauracrats” and don’t confuse an “Administration” with the “special interests” who they take orders from. Federal bureaucrats for the most part know their business, they merely need to be told what to do, and what not to do. The current administration wouldn’t have had to conceive anything pertaining to 9/11, as such earthshaking plans would have been years in the making, and handled by Federal bureaucrats, and allied special interests, across several administrations if needed. Administrations usually change every eight years, the Federal beauracracy has no such limitations on continuity. The Bush administration would have merely had to use their authority to see to it that certain things were done, or not done, at certain times, for 9/11 to have been carried off without a hitch. No mere “terrorist” group in the world, could have pulled off 9/11 all by themselves. This was without a doubt, a crime that required high level government connections, to pull off in any way, shape, or form.

  11. David Rosenberg

    Who are we to believe?
    Those that claim 911 was rigged and their experts confim it or the other sides experts that say a plane can bring down the towers?
    One shows when steel melts at a certain degree of temperature, while the other shows a different temperature.
    One question that I have never heard is why did the South Tower, hit after the North Tower, collapse first? Shouln’t have the North Tower collapse first?
    Why did the third building collape at all? Why was it evacuated before the collapse, how did they know it was to collapse?
    These are but a few of the unanswered questions revolving around that day, that have not been answered and in some cases not even asked, in the Five years since.
    I am convinenced of one thing, the current administration, I believe would have no problem, being behind 9/11.

  12. truthspeak

    Larry Silverstein purchased the WTC complex just 6 months prior to the 9/11 attacks. the first thing Mr. Silverstein did was change the company responsible for the security of the complex to Securacom, just so happens George Bush’s brother, Marvin Bush was on it’s board of directors, and Marvin’s cousin, Wirt Walker III, was it’s CEO.

    The WTC was promptly insured for $7 Billion and covered against “terrorist attacks”, the complex was purchased for a down payment of $124 million.

    The towers required 200 million in renovations most related to removal of hazardous building materials, It was well known by the city of New York the WTC was an asbestos bombshell.

    WTC Building 7 was covered under the same insurance policy, It to collapsed 8 hours later it was not struck by an aircraft, how could this happen?

    The answer came from Mr.Silverstein during a PBS interview a year later, on 9/11/2002:

    “I remember getting a call from the…er…fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said,’We’ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it’ And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.”

    The decision to “pull” WTC 7 delighted many people, It has been reported that thousands of sensitive files relating to some of the biggest financial scams in history ie Enron and WorldCom were stored in these offices.

  13. Joan S.


    You obviously don’t work high enough in government to understand the level of advanced planning that went into both the Patriot Acts, and the Iraq War. These events were both planned in advance, so high level government planning definitely made them possible. If you can accept that foreign terrorists could have been behind 9/11, you must also accept the more plausible scenario that it was done by criminal elements of our own government in conjuction with criminal elements in allied agencies, and governments. If you can’t deal with this, then you’re just falling for the more implausible, government line. Let the entire range of facts and real evidence determine the perpetrator of 9/11, not government propaganda. This is how real criminal cases are solved everyday, and 9/11 should be no different.

  14. Gail

    The Popular Mechanics article was written by Michael Chertoff’s cousin. I heard an interview with the cousin and he denied knowing Michael Chertoff or the family relationship. This has been revealed to have been a lie. They are first cousin and the families know each other well. Also, hasn’t the author read about the takeover of management of Popular Mechanics. Please check your facts.

  15. I feel that the Anti-Conspiracy vigor from some liberals and progressives is just as virulent as the “stay the course” vigor of some conservatives.

    I think the administration may well have desired such an event as 9-11 to occur for their own purposes. The main thing that holds me back from believing the worst case “active administration involvement” theories is the fact that they rely on a really competent and capable administration to carry them out.

    I just don’t believe this administration has shown anywhere near the competence it would take to carry this off, EVEN with the aid of those who really don’t WANT it to be true and are willing to complain loudly about anyone who believes it is true.

    It is hard to believe the Administration would actively create the events of 9-11…but then again, I USED TO BELIVE THAT NO AMERICAN ADMINISTRATION WOULD EVER LIE AND DECIEVE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO START AN UNNECCESARY WAR.

    Starting an entire unneccesary frickin war… now THAT is a conspiracy that should frighten the hell out of all of us…

  16. Cheri Henderson

    Okay. Everybody take a deep breath & relax a moment 😀
    I have worked for the government all my life, on the military & civilian side. Read some books on bureaucracy to figure out how that mess works.
    It IS awfully convenient for the Bush regime that 9/11 happened. But as the Muslim extremists had targeted that building complex for years (remember the 1st bombing?) it’s pretty reasonable to assume Bin Laden did it.
    However (& this is a big however) I tend to wonder about some of the little things. Like, were the buildings not quite as well protected as they could have been (making it easier for terrorist demolition experts to get in & set charges)? and could that screw up have been the reason for lying about demolition charges (security at the Towers being too lax)?
    Also, I remember hearing the Clinton appointed head of security (don’t remember the actual title or name) talking of how his successor refused to meet with him, wanting to take a ‘fresh look’ at the evidence & cases of terrorism. This guy (Clinton’s) had foiled quite a few attempts, at the Towers & elswhere (14? anyone remember this?) and had information that he could not pass on to the new guys, which might have prevented the 9/11 catastrophe.
    Now, if you want & need something bad to happen in order to foist your agenda on the public, the best way to do it is to, ahem, unlock the gate & just wait for the burglars to figure it out.
    That’s so much easier than any kind of cohesive conspiracy.
    Oh, & with government bureaucracies, whenever a snafu occurs of any kind, however unavoidable, you will have department heads running around pointing fingers & covering up stuff everywhere, for the silliest reasons. I’ve seen this over & over. It’s just how the machine ‘works’ – there is no ONE plan or agenda, there are thousands (one for each GS-11 supervisor & O-4 Admin Officer).
    Of course with Fascists in the White House now, there are some nasty big plans out there. In full view.

  17. Bill W.

    In defending the official 9/11 story Ray says: “Sometimes folks kaka just occurs”.

    No folks, when it comes to events that profoundly alter the destiny of nations, “kaka” just doesn’t occur. While it may not be pleasant to contemplate this, common sense and logic will not allow us to be so simple minded as to overlook this fundamental truth of real politics! While everyone is willing to accept that most of our politicians are liars, they have serious trouble taking this obvious fact to it’s logical conclusions: most U.S. politicians are bought and paid for, by special interests who expect tangible results for their bribes and blackmail. In other words, politicians must deliver tangible results in the form of preferred legislation, and in other ways, further the agendas of those special interests that own them. When it comes to real-world politics, if “kaka” happens, you can rest assured that someone planned it that way in advance!

    Now if one considers the facts that both the Iraq war, and the Patriot Acts, were planned and written, far in advance of 9/11, this shows clearly that powerful special interests both in and outside of government, were plotting the post 9/11 political environment, far in advance of the attacks. If post 9/11 events were planned far in advance of 9/11, then it stands to reason that the attacks themselves, were more than likely, the result of such planning and plotting. The government accepts a conspiracy for 9/11, they just name Bin Laden as the conspirator. On the other hand, a corrupt congress and whitehouse are clearly responsible for both the Iraq War, and the unconstitutional Patriot Acts, not Bin Laden.

    Since Bin Laden is on record disavowing any involvement in the 9/11 attacks, and no indisputable proof of his involvement has been brought forward, we should not be so quick to run with the Whitehouse’s story that he is the perpetrator of 9/11. Furthermore, Bin Laden in no way benefitted from the 9/11 attacks, and did not possess the means to carry out such attacks. The only people to actually benefit from the 9/11 attacks, are the Bush Whitehouse and the special interests they serve (among whom are found the Oil and Arms industries). More importantly, they’re also the only suspects with the connections and means, required to actually carry out the 9/11 attacks. The official 9/11 account is essentially an urban legend that covers up what actually occurred while blaming the attacks on a person who’s denial is on record. The Bush Whitehouse’s track record of telling huge lies, and getting away with it. Osama Bin Laden has no such track record.

  18. Phil

    So the folks who doubt the Official Storyâ„¢ base their beliefs on real evidence and scientific fact, and when others try to argue against them, all they can do is call names and repeat talking points without ever presenting an actual counter-argument.

    Very telling.

  19. rexgoliath

    Yea and the moon landing was a hoax and Hilter never murdered any Jews and Al Gore was behind the Oklahoma City bombing. Why do so many otherwise seemingly intelligent people always have to look for a cover up? Sometimes folks kaka just occurs.

    Not to say there aren’t plenty of blunders and cover ups to go around. The U.S. has had it’s dirty little hands in so much crap around the world in the last 200 years do we really have to ask why we are so universally and justifiably despised?

    Is it so hard to believe that these people (our “leaders”)are just so f…ing stupid they can’t find there butts in the dark? Their insatiable greed (which has been the absolute driving force behind American policy for most of our history) and chilling disregard for true moral values keeps leading them to but yet another predictable crisis. We as a nation, we who keep these jokers in power, leading us by the nose while we allow them to destroy our society and if not stopped will lead the entire world into another period of dark ages, are our own worst enemies. We don’t need no stinkin terrorist to shoot us in the foot we’ll take care of that ourselves. VOTE! with your ballot before it’s too late and we have to carry them out. VOTE! and clear Congress and this administration (and any other administration who wants to do business as usual) out of town.

  20. Ray

    Rational Analysis??? The overwhelming evidence of government involvement in 911 and the coverup cannot be thrown aside. One would have to be an idiot not to see the obvious motive behind the attacks. And it is such a coincedence that our military was out to lunch that morning of 911. Wake Up America and resist the Fascism taking over this once great country before it is too late to stop.