New polls look bad for Clinton

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s positive rating has dropped to a new low of 37 percent in an NBC/Wall Street Journal poll released on Wednesday.

According to the poll, the New York senator’s positive rating slid 8 percentage points in two weeks and she had a negative rating of 48 percent in a week where she admitted making a mistake in claiming she had come under sniper fire during a 1996 trip to Bosnia.

Clinton’s Democratic rival, Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, also saw a slight dip in his positive rating, to 49 percent from 51 percent, the poll found.

Clinton, who would be the first female U.S. president, and Obama, who would be the first black president, are in a heated battle for the Democratic nomination to face presumptive Republican nominee John McCain in November’s election.

The survey was taken after Obama gave a speech last week on race in America and rejected racially charged remarks by his pastor in Chicago of two decades, Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

NBC said 32 percent of respondents said Obama “sufficiently addressed the issue” and 26 percent said he needed to say more about the Wright controversy.

More than half of those surveyed — 55 percent — said they were “disturbed” by the videos of Wright that were widely circulated on television and the Internet, the poll found.

In head-to-head matchups, Obama and Clinton were even at 45 percent. In general election matchups, Obama led McCain by 44 percent to 42 percent and McCain led Clinton by 46 percent to 44 percent.

When asked which candidate could unite the country if elected, 60 percent said Obama, 58 percent said McCain and 46 percent said Clinton.

The poll of 700 registered voters was conducted on Monday and Tuesday and had a margin of error of 3.7 percentage points.

NBC said its pollsters oversampled African-Americans to get a more reliable cross tabulation on questions regarding Obama’s speech on race.


  1. Klaus Hergeschimmer

    Nicht viel die Clintons In das ORAL office -Whether They’re Wearing A Dress Or Pants (Or Both) (-heh-heh-heh-heh-heh-heh-heh-heh-heh-heh-heh-heh-heh-heh-heh

  2. Bluesman2007

    That’s THE problem Pangaea. The vast majority don’t get it. If they did, we wouldn’t be having this discussion. So the problem becomes, how do we get them to “get it”? Let’s get to the roots. The strategy should never be and should never have been how to “prove they’re wrong” because it’s obvious they’re wrong but that’s not the problem. The problem is no “proof” has any meaning for “a believer”. They don’t need facts. They don’t need proof. They’re not “fact checkers”. We’re not speaking their language. That’s pretty clear to me.

    So that’s why that approach can never work. But I believe that having their noses rubbed with foreclosures and escalating gas and food prices and tighter credit WILL (thank the lord) tighten their shorts just enough (I hope) to begin to get their attention before their privates get squeezed out of existence. But then again, come to think about it, maybe that’s just nature’s way of thinning the heard. Who knows. I’m tired and going to bed. Goodnight all.