1. Why does every article that calls DCGS-A a failure also tout the capabilities of Palantir? We should ask Palantir’s PR people. The clue is that no other tools are praised – just Palantir. Another grain of salt, please.

  2. “omitted some key facts”
    “while testifying before Congress”

    Isn’t that called ‘perjury’? I’ll believe that’s a crime when Texas executes someone for it.


Comments are closed.