Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone

Feds halt seizure of Nevada rancher’s cattle

By
April 13, 2014

The Bundy family and their supporters fly the American flag as their cattle were released by the Bureau of Land Management back onto public land outside of Bunkerville, Nev. (AP Photo/Las Vegas Review-Journal, Jason Bean)

The Bundy family and their supporters fly the American flag as their cattle were released by the Bureau of Land Management back onto public land outside of Bunkerville, Nev.
(AP Photo/Las Vegas Review-Journal, Jason Bean)

Federal land managers say “escalating tensions” led them to release all 400 or so head of cattle rounded up on public land in southern Nevada from a rancher who has refused to recognize their authority.

Bureau of Land Management Chief Neil Kornze announced an abrupt halt to the weeklong roundup just hours before the release.

“Based on information about conditions on the ground and in consultation with law enforcement, we have made a decision to conclude the cattle gather because of our serious concerns about the safety of employees and members of the public,” Kornze said in a statement.

Hundreds of states’ rights protesters, including militia members, showed up at corrals outside Mesquite to demand the animals’ return to rancher Cliven Bundy. Some protesters were armed with handguns and rifles at the corrals and at an earlier nearby rally.

Las Vegas Police Lt. Dan Zehnder said the showdown was resolved with no injuries and no violence. Clark County Sheriff Doug Gillespie was able to negotiate a resolution after talking with Bundy, he said.

The fight between Bundy and the Bureau of Land Management widened into a debate about states’ rights and federal land-use policy. The dispute that ultimately triggered the roundup dates to 1993, when the bureau cited concern for the federally protected tortoise in the region. The bureau revoked Bundy’s grazing rights after he stopped paying grazing fees and disregarded federal court orders to remove his animals.

Kornze’s announcement came after Bundy repeatedly promised to “do whatever it takes” to protect his property and after a string of raucous confrontations between his family members and supporters and federal agents during the weeklong operation.

Bundy did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Republican Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval issued a statement praising the agency for its willingness to listen to the state’s concerns. He earlier criticized the agency for creating “an atmosphere of intimidation” and trying to confine protesters to a fenced-in “First Amendment area” well away from the sprawling roundup area.

“The safety of all individuals involved in this matter has been my highest priority,” Sandoval said. “Given the circumstances, today’s outcome is the best we could have hoped for.”

Nevada’s congressional delegation urged the protesters to be calm and to leave the area.

“The dispute is over, the BLM is leaving, but emotions and tensions are still near the boiling point, and we desperately need a peaceful conclusion to this conflict,” U.S. Sen. Dean Heller, R-Nev., said in a statement. “I urge all the people involved to please return to your homes and allow the BLM officers to collect their equipment and depart without interference.”

The 400 cows gathered during the roundup were short of the BLM’s goal of 900 cows that it says have been trespassing on U.S. land without required grazing permits for over 20 years.

Bundy, 67, doesn’t recognize federal authority on land he insists belongs to Nevada. His Mormon family has operated a ranch since the 1870s near the small town of Bunkerville and the Utah and Arizona lines.

“Good morning America, good morning world, isn’t it a beautiful day in Bunkerville?” Bundy told a cheering crowd after his cattle were released, according to the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

The crowd protesting Saturday recited the pledge of allegiance, and many offered prayers. Others waved placards reading, “This land is your land,” and “We teach our children not to bully. How do we teach our government not to be big bullies?” according to the newspaper.

It’s the latest skirmish since the 1980s when the Sagebrush Rebellion challenged federal ownership of Nevada rangeland ranchers said was rightfully theirs.

A federal judge in Las Vegas first ordered Bundy to remove his trespassing cattle in 1998. The bureau was implementing two federal court orders last year to remove Bundy’s cattle after making repeated efforts to resolve the matter outside court, Kornze said, adding the rancher has not paid grazing fees in 20 years.

“This is a matter of fairness and equity, and we remain disappointed that Cliven Bundy continues to not comply with the same laws that 16,000 public-lands ranchers do every year,” Kornze said. “After 20 years and multiple court orders to remove the trespass cattle, Mr. Bundy owes the American taxpayers in excess of $1 million. The BLM will continue to work to resolve the matter administratively and judicially.”

___

Ken Ritter in Mesquite, Nev., contributed to this report.

_______________________________________________________

Copyright  © 2014 Capitol Hill Blue

Copyright  © 2014 The Associated Press  All Rights Reserved

4 Responses to Feds halt seizure of Nevada rancher’s cattle

  1. Danny Adams

    April 13, 2014 at 2:54 pm

    So let me see if I’ve got this straight. These militia folks are willing to let farmers and ranchers all over the country lose their land for a variety of unethical reasons like Monsanto lawsuits and they don’t say a word, but when a guy gets angry about losing the ability to not pay to use land that he and his family never owned in the first place, they show up in force. Displaying their native intelligence, obviously.

    • woody188

      April 14, 2014 at 6:55 am

      There is obviously much more to the story given the Nevada governor’s earlier statement. AP likes to exclude important information in order to give their stories a pro-federal slant. Reuters does it as well but AP is worse and has dropped most impartiality from their stories for some time now.

      • Danny Adams

        April 15, 2014 at 8:16 pm

        Actually I’ve been following Bundy’s story on and off for nearly two years, since shortly after the last time the BLM tried taking his cattle, in the process of researching the modern cattle industry out West. I’ve read the 1998 court documents and numerous Las Vegas and Mesquite news articles about him since that time (including one from 2012 where he told the local paper that he would never follow any federal law).

        He owns a 150,000 acre ranch which a magazine article described a couple of years ago as “pristine”. Of course it’s pristine; he generally doesn’t graze his cattle on his own land.

        My conclusion in these two years is that he’s nothing more than an opportunist who makes a mockery of ranchers and farmers, by slapping his own face on the real tragedies going on everywhere in the country of ranchers and farmers losing their lands both to the government and corporations, in order to keep receiving his agricultural welfare.

        • woody188

          April 16, 2014 at 10:14 am

          Seems like the issue is the ownership of the grazing land in question is in dispute.