Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone

Anti-Obamacare rants: Facts don’t support rhetoric

By CAPITOL HILL BLUE and Wire Service Reports
February 6, 2014

Based on what facts?

Based on what facts?

As is normal in political debates, the facts come up short of matching rhetoric, especially when it comes to anti-Obamacare rants from the usual collective of Republican naysayers.

The rabid right has jumped on a new report from the Congressional Budget Office that claims the new healthcare law will “encourage” millions of Americans to quit work or reduce their hours on the job so they can qualify for more benefits and subsidies from the government.

This, of course, rings an “I told you so” chorus from Republicans who pound their chests and say the report proves what they claimed all along:  That health care reform will kill jobs.

But will it.  Once gain, the facts don’t match the rhetoric.

The analysis by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office predicts the law will give several million people an opportunity to work less or not at all, because they won’t be stuck in jobs just for the sake of keeping the health insurance they get from employers. To some Republicans, that amounts to “wreaking havoc on working families,” ”dire consequences for workers” and a shower of pink slips across the land — conclusions unsupported by the report.

The study estimates that the workforce will be reduced by the equivalent of 2.3 million full-time workers by 2021 as people choose to leave it. More would take early retirement, work fewer hours or otherwise rearrange their work-home balance to take advantage of new subsidies for health insurance and new markets for individual policies that don’t depend on having a job.

In a key point overlooked in the GOP response, the report says, “The estimated reduction stems almost entirely from a net decline in the amount of labor that workers choose to supply, rather than from a net drop in businesses’ demand for labor.”

In other words, workers aren’t being laid off. They are taking themselves out of the workforce, in many cases opening job opportunities for others.

As if recognizing that fellow Republicans were getting a bit overheated, Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, House Budget Committee chairman, introduced a reality check when questioning Douglas Elmendorf, budget office director, during a hearing Wednesday. “So just to understand this, it’s not that employers are laying people off, it’s that … people aren’t working in the workforce, aren’t supplying labor,” he posited.

“That is right,” Elmendorf replied.

A look at some of the Republican claims and how they compare with the facts:

SEN. MARCO RUBIO of Florida: “Just yesterday, the Congressional Budget Office found that Obamacare will cost millions of Americans their jobs.”

REP. JOHN KLINE of Minnesota: “The president’s health care law is destroying full-time jobs. … This fatally flawed health care scheme is wreaking havoc on working families nationwide.”

REP. PHIL GINGREY of Georgia: Obamacare creates “unprecedented uncertainty for job creators that, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, will leave millions of people looking for work in the next few years.”

___

THE FACTS: No one knows whether the health care law will turn out to be good or bad for jobs and the economy. Everything is guesswork, however educated the guess.

The budget office, generally respected by both sides but not infallible, predicts some elements of the health care law will help job growth and other parts will hurt it.

On the plus side, for example, it expects lower-income people to have more money to spend because more of them will have their health insurance partially or fully paid for by government under the law. On the negative side, Elmendorf told Ryan’s committee that in the short run, the law would increase employers’ costs for their workers and reduce the number of people they hire. Over time, this could put downward pressure on wages, he said.

But those effects, good and bad, are expected to be modest. Of more consequence is the expectation that millions will take themselves voluntarily out of the labor force because they can afford to.

The budget office forecast that over the next several years, there will be plenty of unemployed people available to fill those jobs. But over the longer term as the economy improves, the supply will shrink, and because of that, total employment and the number of hours people work will be less than it would have been without the health care law.

A smaller workforce means fewer people producing goods and services, which translates into slower economic growth. The CBO report also forecasts that an aging population will cause more Americans to retire, further reducing the workforce. That’s the main reason it expects growth to average roughly 2.5 percent over the next 10 years, below its long-run pace of about 3 percent.

Some Republicans picked their words more carefully than others in reacting to the report.

House Speaker John Boehner, for example, said the report backs up Republican arguments that Obamacare “hurts take-home pay,” a plausible point as far as it goes. Ryan said the availability of health insurance subsidies will be a disincentive to find work, a claim supported by the study.

But the predicted withdrawal from the labor market is no more a killer of jobs than today’s surge of retirements by baby boomers entering old age. If anything, it could open job opportunities for people who can’t get in the workforce now.

___

Associated Press writers Calvin Woodward and Alan Fram contributed to this report.
_______________________________________________________

Copyright  © 2014 Capitol Hill Blue

Copyright  © 2014 The Associated Press  All Rights Reserved.

Enhanced by Zemanta

5 Responses to Anti-Obamacare rants: Facts don’t support rhetoric

  1. woody188

    February 6, 2014 at 9:39 am

    Smaller workforce equals less tax base which means subsidies will have to be cut or taxes will have to be raised. Kind of missed that in the above report.

    • Bill Cravener

      February 6, 2014 at 3:38 pm

      A smaller work force? Less taxes? How so?

      As stated in the above piece, and I quote; But the predicted withdrawal from the labor market is no more a killer of jobs than today’s surge of retirements by baby boomers entering old age. If anything, it could open job opportunities for people who can’t get in the workforce now.

      Does not giving older workers the means to quit their jobs because they no longer need the additional income to pay for healthcare open up jobs for younger folks? The facts do not show the ACA killing jobs. The reality is it will in the end create jobs for those who need them the most.

      Add to that the simple fact with more people covered under the new ACA law there will be a need for more people in the healthcare system such as doctors, nurses, etc. That will be the creation of more jobs not less.

      Critics of the ACA need to get a grip on the fact that it is here to stay!

      • woody188

        February 7, 2014 at 7:28 am

        I can’t help your reading comprehension.

        • Pablo

          February 8, 2014 at 4:00 am

          @woody188 Obviously you can’t help Bill’s comprehension, because you lack comprehension.

          The TOTAL work force will get smaller.
          The EMPLOYED work force stays the same size.
          The UNEMPLOYED work force is the part that gets smaller.

          To most economists, that’s rather a good thing all the way around.

          • woody188

            February 10, 2014 at 6:39 am

            If the total workforce shrinks that means fewer people paying taxes and more people taking SS, ACA, Medicare, Medicaid/welfare. Who’s going to pay for all that?

            We are either going to cut services or raise taxes on those still in the workforce. I can’t make it any clearer. China won’t loan us money forever.