<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No budget, no pay: An incredible idea whose time has come?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/46204/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/46204</link>
	<description>The oldest political news site on the Internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:31:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/46204/comment-page-1#comment-227897</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 06:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=46204#comment-227897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They are.  And I think it&#039;s safe to say that few of them pull down $170 grand a year.  Perhaps the same &quot;IOU&quot; papers could be given to Congressmen.

After all, why become a park ranger, if you know that your pay, through no fault of your own, could be arbitrarily stopped?  Or a fireman?  Or an SEC inspector?  Somehow these arguments carry a lot less weight when you start to look at them seriously.

&quot;For some park rangers, $24,000 a year is barely enough to get by upon, even if their spouse works full-time.&quot;


J.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are.  And I think it&#8217;s safe to say that few of them pull down $170 grand a year.  Perhaps the same &#8220;IOU&#8221; papers could be given to Congressmen.</p>
<p>After all, why become a park ranger, if you know that your pay, through no fault of your own, could be arbitrarily stopped?  Or a fireman?  Or an SEC inspector?  Somehow these arguments carry a lot less weight when you start to look at them seriously.</p>
<p>&#8220;For some park rangers, $24,000 a year is barely enough to get by upon, even if their spouse works full-time.&#8221;</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/46204/comment-page-1#comment-227832</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 01:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=46204#comment-227832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, how is it exactly that federal workers don&#039;t get paid if we hit a budget stonewall, but Congress does? Aren&#039;t they federal workers as well?

I don&#039;t know how much the pay freeze would hurt, considering how many of them are millionaires, but it might at least be an ongoing insult to their pride.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, how is it exactly that federal workers don&#8217;t get paid if we hit a budget stonewall, but Congress does? Aren&#8217;t they federal workers as well?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know how much the pay freeze would hurt, considering how many of them are millionaires, but it might at least be an ongoing insult to their pride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/46204/comment-page-1#comment-227772</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 21:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=46204#comment-227772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;For some lawmakers, the $174,000 congressional salary is barely enough to get by on, especially if a spouse doesn’t work&quot;

Somehow I&#039;m not very sympathetic.  In many families where the spouse works, it&#039;s because they *have* to, not by choice.  If representatives&#039; spouses have to work, well, I guess they&#039;d better roll up their sleeves and get to it.

Even after taxes, that has to be north of $10,000 a month.  Just what sort of mortgages are they paying?

J.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;For some lawmakers, the $174,000 congressional salary is barely enough to get by on, especially if a spouse doesn’t work&#8221;</p>
<p>Somehow I&#8217;m not very sympathetic.  In many families where the spouse works, it&#8217;s because they *have* to, not by choice.  If representatives&#8217; spouses have to work, well, I guess they&#8217;d better roll up their sleeves and get to it.</p>
<p>Even after taxes, that has to be north of $10,000 a month.  Just what sort of mortgages are they paying?</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
