<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama promises tough, liberal stance on fiscal issues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/46127/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/46127</link>
	<description>The oldest political news site on the Internet because nobody&#039;s life, liberty or property is safe while Congress is in session.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:14:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: griff6r</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/46127/comment-page-1#comment-226238</link>
		<dc:creator>griff6r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 17:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=46127#comment-226238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Obama&#039;s avenue to decreasing the deficit and making healthcare cheaper is to increase the cost of healthcare (while, of course, removing our freedom to choose whether or not we want into the system), at the same increasing the deficit in order to pay for it.

And, as the article states, he didn&#039;t mention how he plans to do it.

Why? Because it&#039;s not possible.

Yeah, Obama&#039;s liberal stances are tough - on every one but the moneyed beneficiaries of said policies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Obama&#8217;s avenue to decreasing the deficit and making healthcare cheaper is to increase the cost of healthcare (while, of course, removing our freedom to choose whether or not we want into the system), at the same increasing the deficit in order to pay for it.</p>
<p>And, as the article states, he didn&#8217;t mention how he plans to do it.</p>
<p>Why? Because it&#8217;s not possible.</p>
<p>Yeah, Obama&#8217;s liberal stances are tough &#8211; on every one but the moneyed beneficiaries of said policies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
