Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone

Congress shows more support for limitng size of gun magazines

By KEVIN FREKING | Associated Press
December 24, 2012

122412lapierreap

NRA honcho Wayne LaPierre (AP)

Lawmakers from both parties voiced their willingness Sunday to pursue some changes to the nation’s gun laws, but adamant opposition from the National Rifle Association has made clear than any such effort will face significant obstacles.

NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre dismissed efforts to revive a ban on assault weapons as a “phony piece of legislation” that’s built on lies.

Democratic lawmakers in Congress have become more adamant about the need for stricter gun laws since the shooting of 20 children and six teachers at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California is promising to push for a renewal of expired legislation that banned certain weapons and limited the number of bullets a gun magazine could hold to 10.

“I think we ought to be looking at where the real danger is, like those large clips,” said Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas.

“I think we need a comprehensive approach,” said Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., a longtime gun rights supporter. “I’ll look at all the proposals. . I think it looks at mental health, I think it looks at protecting our schools but I also think it looks at these high-volume magazines, you know, that can fire off so many rounds.”

Both lawmakers appeared on CBS’ “Face the Nation,” where NRA President David Keene said lawmakers were asking the wrong question when discussing how many rounds a gun magazine should have.

The right question, he said: “Can we keep guns out of the hands of people who are potential killers?”

LaPierre made clear it was highly unlikely that the NRA could support any new gun regulations.

“You want one more law on top of 20,000 laws, when most of the federal gun laws we don’t even enforce?” he said.

Instead, LaPierre reiterated the group’s support for putting police officers in every school.

“If it’s crazy to call for putting police and armed security in our schools to protect our children, then call me crazy,” LaPierre said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” ”I think the American people think it’s crazy not to do it. It’s the one thing that would keep people safe.”

Sen. Joe Lieberman, a Connecticut independent, said he found the NRA’s statements in recent days to be “really disheartening.” Still, he said he agrees with some of the points the group has made about the causes behind violence in America.

“But it’s obviously also true that the easy availability of guns, including military-style assault weapons, is a contributing factor, and you can’t keep that off the table. I had hoped they’d come to the table and say, everything is on the table,” Lieberman said.

Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said LaPierre was “so extreme and so tone deaf” that he was making it easier to pass gun legislation.

“Look, he blames everything but guns: movies, the media, President Obama, gun-free school zones, you name it. And the video games, he blames them,” Schumer said.

Lieberman said the NRA’s stand on new gun rules means passing legislation next year won’t happen easily.

“It’s going to be a battle. But the president, I think, and vice president, are really ready to lead the fight,” he said.

Copyright 2012 The Associated Press

Enhanced by Zemanta

2 Responses to Congress shows more support for limitng size of gun magazines

  1. Sandy Price

    December 24, 2012 at 10:50 am

    Don’t believe any member of Congress. They need money from the NRA and they will never make a noise against them. We had a chance to get rid of the House and we forgot to do it. We are at fault!

  2. Jon

    December 26, 2012 at 11:34 pm

    I’m all in favour of limiting gun magazines. They should be no more than 8.5×11 inches, no less than fifty pages of which at least half must be factual content not advertising, their reviewers should be unbiased, anyone on their cover or centerfold must be at least 50% dress… oh. sorry. Never mind… :-)

    Minor serious point here. There are zillions of laws, and very few are enforced. “More laws” is not really the solution to this problem, but if you give a Congressman a hammer…

    J.