Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone

In some ways, the surge is working

By
February 15, 2008

Though largely dismissed by the Democratic left, America’s “surge” policy is paying attractive dividends. Al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) is in retreat, violence is down and political reconciliation is up.

In a 16-page letter that U.S. soldiers found last October near Baghdad, AQI leader Abu Tariq complained that his 600-man force had dwindled to 20 terrorists.

“We were mistreated, cheated and betrayed by some of our brothers,” he moaned, as Sunnis swapped AQI for the USA. This shift “created panic, fear and the unwillingness to fight,” another AQI chief whined in his own missive discovered in November near Samarra. His network, he said, suffered “total collapse.”

Terrorism is collapsing across Iraq. In February 2007, when President Bush ordered 30,000 additional troops into Iraq — as Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., cheered and Democratic Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois jeered — only 8 percent of Baghdad’s neighborhoods were rated secure. That number is now 75 percent. In 2006, coalition troops defused 2,662 terrorist weapons caches. In 2007, they neutralized 6,956. Since June, attacks on U.S. soldiers have slid 60 percent. Meanwhile, sectarian violence fell 90 percent from January to December 2007, sparing Iraqi and U.S. lives alike.

“In a sense, Iraqis have been ‘re-liberated’ from al Qaeda,” says Pete Hegseth, executive director of Vets for Freedom, America’s largest organization of veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. “This time, I believe they want their country back for good.”

For years, terrorists repeatedly bombed Iraq’s oil pipelines, fouling the ground, forcing inky columns of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere and frying the fledgling republic’s oil revenues. Pipelines that the Army Corps of Engineers has shielded helped push Iraq’s December 2007 daily oil output to 2.475 million barrels — 96 percent of pre-war capacity. This year’s daily goal is 3 million barrels, or 16 percent above pre-war levels. Last month, the Iraqi Oil Ministry announced that it was speaking with Royal Dutch Petroleum (A.K.A. Shell) and four international companies about investing in Iraq’s petroleum sector to drag it from the 1970s into the 21st century.

This far-brighter security climate is depriving the Democratic left of its last anti-surge talking point. As House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., told CNN on Feb. 10, “The gains have not produced the desired effect, which is the reconciliation of Iraq. This is a failure.”

Either Pelosi is self-deluded, or she spoke prematurely. On Wednesday, the Iraqi parliament scored a trifecta. It adopted a $48 billion budget, scheduled provincial elections for Oct. 1 within the context of new rules governing central, regional and local authorities, and passed an amnesty measure that could free thousands of mainly Sunni detainees not accused of serious crimes. Legislators embraced these bills unanimously.

“Today is a wedding for Iraq’s parliament,” said speaker Mahmoud Mashhadani. “We have proved that Iraqis are just one bloc.”

Iraqi lawmakers also recently green-lighted a de-Baathification law that bars some of Saddam Hussein’s former henchmen from public service, but welcomes back many more dismissed functionaries who have clean hands. A new pension law will grant retirement incomes to older ex-Baathists. If not their love, this should buy their peace.

Despite such dramatic security gains and serious political progress, American and allied troops must stay vigilant. AQI remains deadly and jaw-droppingly brutal. While some on the American left vilify the Boy Scouts, recently released videotapes show AQI training 10-year-old lads how to kidnap and slaughter people and blow themselves up with suicide vests. Meanwhile, AQI sent two bomb-equipped women with Down’s syndrome into two Baghdad pet markets on Feb. 1. They exploded these innocent women by remote control, murdering them and 73 other people, wounding 167, and wiping out helpless birds and other animal companions.

This butchery recalled a January 2005 atrocity in which AQI strapped dynamite to a 19-year-old with Down’s syndrome and sent him to mingle among voters. They detonated him to disrupt Election Day.

It is difficult to imagine more barbaric abuse of mentally handicapped human beings since Adolf Hitler used carbon monoxide to exterminate mentally retarded Germans at Wiesbaden’s Hadamar Psychiatric Institute in the early 1940s. Al Qaeda in Iraq forces (and their comrades worldwide) must be destroyed, just as were the Nazis. America’s surge is driving them to similar doom.

(New York commentator Deroy Murdock is a columnist media fellow with the Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace at Stanford University. E-mail him at deroy.murdock(at)gmail.com.)

One Response to In some ways, the surge is working

  1. CheckerboardStrangler

    February 16, 2008 at 12:09 am

    Sure the surge is working, and Petraeus should get the credit, along with the brave men and women doing the fighting.

    It wasn’t just a surge, it was a complete and total rethink packaged along with an increase in the number of troops.
    Not only were the numbers increased, their job description was
    streamlined to accomplish the objective more fully than the five years of haphazard empire building and ideological zealotry heralded in by the frontrunners of Bush’s first team, who did more to bungle the financial and structural management of post-invasion Iraq than a team of cigar smoking chimpanzees
    in seersucker suits and straw hats.

    Bring in the committed military leaders, who refuse to play
    political gamesmanship and who are willing to stand up to the administration and tell them THEIR WAY isn’t working, and then give them the tools that they need, and the US military can accomplish any task given them.

    For the first time since the original Iraq Study Group convened, we now have a clean and clear objective, and it’s security, and a rebuilt infrastructure, not some lofty artificial pipe dream of spreading democracy.

    Iraq has been given a system reboot, and it’s working.
    It would have been smarter to not go there in the first place, but at the very least one can measure the results
    and gains brought about by soldiers who want to fight for the right and give of themselves to the people, once they are allowed to do so.

    Like it or not, Bush doesn’t get the credit for this any more than Lyndon Johnson gets credit for the civil rights movement. The folks who made this possible are the ones who told it like it is when called before Congress and asked their honest opinion, and then received holy hell for it.

    And these people were backed up by the American soldier, who just wants a clearly defined goal and the ways and means to achieve it. If it’s a hill they have to capture, just tell em where it is, and if it’s a town they have to secure, just tell them who the bad guys are, why they are, and how they operate.

    I don’t know what the future holds for Iraq.
    I hope that the collective powers that be will find a way to see value in what they are building and will find a way to mobilize the people who live there, over and above any outside influences, save only a desire to see right done by the common man. I hope that they see fit to fight to keep what they have now rather than let it be tossed to the wolves when we go.
    But sooner or later, go we must, and if we leave a good lasting impression of our intent, maybe some of it will rub off and not get lost in translation.

    That will only happen when the carpetbaggers and ideologues give way to the simple men and women in uniform who see wrong and want to right it, and whose dedication to peace can be understood by a weary people who might now have something small worth holding onto.