<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Right wing gets self-righteous over Obama video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/45245/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/45245</link>
	<description>The oldest political news site on the Internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 08:18:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Almandine</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/45245/comment-page-1#comment-209158</link>
		<dc:creator>Almandine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 17:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=45245#comment-209158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The point of the article was, of course, a focus on the tone and mudslinging of BHO&#039;s speech, which then and now is seen as merely another of his divisive political ploys to make himself appear as ever the friend and champion of the common man, no matter how far from truth that be. My comment was aimed at the public revelation of that juxtaposition.

For anyone, even now, to make the argument about Bush 43 and his personal decision-making with regard to emergency preparations and relief efforts vis-a-vis Katrina is just another chapter in the politics of opponent bashing and points to the continuing ideological chasm between what 43 was actually, personally responsible for and what people like yourself find as grist for your ideological mill. 

It is a good thing, though, that the emergency relief funding bill that BHO voted NO on, just 10 days before his speech referenced in the article above, passed anyway, since those funds were sorely needed for Katrina disaster relief and beyond. 

In retrospect, one must ask of BHO... doesn&#039;t it take a special kind of hubris to get up and talk like that when your own actions were in direct opposition to preparing for disaster and could have, if others hadn&#039;t taken proper precautions, caused a relief debacle far greater than actually occurred?

And in consideration, who was actually the bigger incompetent?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point of the article was, of course, a focus on the tone and mudslinging of BHO&#8217;s speech, which then and now is seen as merely another of his divisive political ploys to make himself appear as ever the friend and champion of the common man, no matter how far from truth that be. My comment was aimed at the public revelation of that juxtaposition.</p>
<p>For anyone, even now, to make the argument about Bush 43 and his personal decision-making with regard to emergency preparations and relief efforts vis-a-vis Katrina is just another chapter in the politics of opponent bashing and points to the continuing ideological chasm between what 43 was actually, personally responsible for and what people like yourself find as grist for your ideological mill. </p>
<p>It is a good thing, though, that the emergency relief funding bill that BHO voted NO on, just 10 days before his speech referenced in the article above, passed anyway, since those funds were sorely needed for Katrina disaster relief and beyond. </p>
<p>In retrospect, one must ask of BHO&#8230; doesn&#8217;t it take a special kind of hubris to get up and talk like that when your own actions were in direct opposition to preparing for disaster and could have, if others hadn&#8217;t taken proper precautions, caused a relief debacle far greater than actually occurred?</p>
<p>And in consideration, who was actually the bigger incompetent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: egc52556</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/45245/comment-page-1#comment-209146</link>
		<dc:creator>egc52556</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 16:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=45245#comment-209146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Almadine -- some accusations aren&#039;t worth refuting.  Bush&#039;s response to Katrina DID disproportionally harm people of color.  Bush&#039;s response to Katrina WAS incompetent.  The reaction from blacks is FAIRLY described as a &quot;quiet riot&quot;.

Do the Republicans REALLY want to reopen their administration&#039;s response to Katrina now?  Do the really think this is going to be a winner for them?  

If they really think so, we&#039;ll have a very nice time talking about the GOP&#039;s incompetence right now in 2012.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almadine &#8212; some accusations aren&#8217;t worth refuting.  Bush&#8217;s response to Katrina DID disproportionally harm people of color.  Bush&#8217;s response to Katrina WAS incompetent.  The reaction from blacks is FAIRLY described as a &#8220;quiet riot&#8221;.</p>
<p>Do the Republicans REALLY want to reopen their administration&#8217;s response to Katrina now?  Do the really think this is going to be a winner for them?  </p>
<p>If they really think so, we&#8217;ll have a very nice time talking about the GOP&#8217;s incompetence right now in 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Almandine</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/45245/comment-page-1#comment-209144</link>
		<dc:creator>Almandine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 16:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=45245#comment-209144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting, in that neither the AP writer nor the Obama spokesman could deny or refute the accusation, instead just throwing rhetorical rocks at &quot;conservatives&quot; who had the gall to notice and comment on the speech.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, in that neither the AP writer nor the Obama spokesman could deny or refute the accusation, instead just throwing rhetorical rocks at &#8220;conservatives&#8221; who had the gall to notice and comment on the speech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
