<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clinton sees a woman president in America&#8217;s future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/43712/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/43712</link>
	<description>The oldest political news site on the Internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 00:21:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim B.</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/43712/comment-page-1#comment-196211</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 22:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=43712#comment-196211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, a woman president would more than likely have to come from the Democratic side as long as the Republicans are &quot;knock, knock, knockin&#039;&quot; on the more fundamentalist Christian denomination&#039;s doors....because many of those denominations relegate women to second-class citizenship, so to speak, within their churches.....Therefore, by extension, they&#039;re not particularly interested in extending power to women...especially to a high-office. (I am deliberately ignoring Palin&#039;s run for VP, because....it was a VP position (I think the sober Repubs. would&#039;ve freaked if she&#039;d really would&#039;ve become President due to McCain&#039;s demise.), and because she never was a true contender in the race due to her inexperience and her profound lack of qualities necessary to lead a nation.)

Now, the real expert on the &quot;influence of religion on politics&quot; would be Sandy who&#039;d give a more authoritative opinion on this, but she&#039;s, unfortunately, not available.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, a woman president would more than likely have to come from the Democratic side as long as the Republicans are &#8220;knock, knock, knockin&#8217;&#8221; on the more fundamentalist Christian denomination&#8217;s doors&#8230;.because many of those denominations relegate women to second-class citizenship, so to speak, within their churches&#8230;..Therefore, by extension, they&#8217;re not particularly interested in extending power to women&#8230;especially to a high-office. (I am deliberately ignoring Palin&#8217;s run for VP, because&#8230;.it was a VP position (I think the sober Repubs. would&#8217;ve freaked if she&#8217;d really would&#8217;ve become President due to McCain&#8217;s demise.), and because she never was a true contender in the race due to her inexperience and her profound lack of qualities necessary to lead a nation.)</p>
<p>Now, the real expert on the &#8220;influence of religion on politics&#8221; would be Sandy who&#8217;d give a more authoritative opinion on this, but she&#8217;s, unfortunately, not available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
