Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone

Romney, Gingrich, Santorum in a battle for the South

By BETH FOUHY
March 13, 2012

Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney greets supporters who braved the rain during a campaign stop at the Whistle Stop Cafe, Monday in Mobile, Ala. (AP Photo/ John David Mercer)

Mitt Romney is working to seal his status as the Republican presidential front-runner with a thus-far-elusive victory in the Deep South.

Closely fought primaries in Alabama and Mississippi offer the former Massachusetts governor a key opportunity in a region that has been slow to embrace him. Tuesday’s primaries are also poised to render a possible final verdict on Newt Gingrich‘s Southern-focused candidacy.

With polls showing an unexpectedly tight race in the conservative bellwether states, Romney made a campaign appearance Monday in Alabama — a clear indication he was eyeing a potential win there.

Romney campaigned with Southern comedian Jeff Foxworthy and poked fun at his own lack of hunting skills, saying he hoped to set out with an Alabama friend who “can actually show me which end of the rifle to point.”

Battling anew to be Romney’s main conservative challenger, Gingrich and Rick Santorum both spoke at an energy forum in Mississippi and took questions on religion in public life at a presidential forum in Birmingham, Ala. They took sharp aim at President Barack Obama, with Santorum labeling the president’s foreign policy “pathetic” and Gingrich taunting Obama as “President Algae” for an energy speech in which Obama spoke of research that would allow oil and gas to be developed from algae one day.

Gingrich has focused his campaign in recent weeks on rising gas prices, promising to bring the price to $2.50 per gallon if elected.

The Southern showdown came as new polling showed a steep drop in Obama’s approval ratings amid escalating prices at the pump and renewed turbulence in the Middle East.

A Washington Post-ABC News poll found that 46 percent of those surveyed approve the way the president is handling his job, and 50 percent disapprove. A New York Times/CBS poll found 41 percent approval, and 47 percent disapproval.

A win in either Mississippi or Alabama would be an important breakthrough for Romney, easing concerns that the Harvard-educated Northeasterner cannot win the party’s most conservative and evangelical voters. Romney did not plan to be in the state during voting Tuesday and was already looking ahead to contests in Missouri on Saturday and Puerto Rico on Sunday.

Santorum, who has angled to campaign head-to-head with Romney, pressed the case again that Gingrich should consider stepping aside.

“People of Mississippi and Alabama want a conservative,” he told reporters in Biloxi. “If they want a conservative nominee for sure, they can do that by lining up behind us and making this race clearly a two-person race outside of the South.”

Santorum planned to watch returns from Louisiana, which holds its primary March 24. He was also heading to Puerto Rico to campaign later in the week.

While Gingrich insists he plans to remain in the race until the Republican National Convention in August, his campaign’s survival essentially rested on winning both Tuesday contests. The former House speaker has pursued an all-Southern strategy, but he has won only South Carolina and Georgia, the latter the state he represented in Congress for 20 years.

Gingrich planned several appearances in Alabama on Tuesday, including remarks to a local chamber of commerce and a visit to the Birmingham Zoo.

He seemed to draw new energy from an enthusiastic crowd at Birmingham forum. They gave him repeated standing ovations as he derided Obama for offering apologies earlier this month to Afghan President Hamid Karzai after American troops burned Islamic holy books, including some Qurans.

“He believes in apologizing to those who kill our young men and women. I will never apologize,” Gingrich said to applause and cheers of “Newt! Newt! Newt!”

All three candidates were receiving support from well-heeled independent groups known as super PACs that were helping to finance television ads, automated phone calls and direct mail in the two states.

A fourth candidate, Texas Rep. Ron Paul, was not competing actively in the two contests.

Hawaii was also holding a primary Tuesday, but none of the GOP hopefuls campaigned there.

Romney has more delegates than his rivals combined, and is amassing them at a rate that puts him on track to clinch control of nomination before the convention opens next summer. The Associated Press tally shows him with 454 of the 1,144 delegates needed to win the nomination. Santorum has 217, Gingrich 107 and Paul 47.

___

Associated Press writers David Espo in Washington and Philip Elliott in Montgomery, Ala., contributed to this report.

Follow Beth Fouhy on Twitter at www.twitter.com/bfouhy

Copyright 2012 The Associated Press

Enhanced by Zemanta

One Response to Romney, Gingrich, Santorum in a battle for the South

  1. woody188

    March 13, 2012 at 9:22 am

    “People of Mississippi and Alabama want a conservative,” he told reporters in Biloxi. “If they want a conservative nominee for sure, they can do that by lining up behind us and making this race clearly a two-person race outside of the South.”

    The truth is none of these three are conservatives which is why none of them are getting a majority of votes. Sure Santorum talks like a social conservative, but votes for huge deficits and earmarks like the famed “Bridge to No Where.”

    Romney invented Obamacare and raised taxes and fees in Massachusetts. It was his plan to raise the taxes and fees, it wasn’t proposed by Democrats. Democrats argued to keep taxes lower. The Massachusetts Romney-era per capita tax burden grew $1,175.71. So one can guess what Romney’s plan will be for budget deficits, ala George H.W. Bush. And we don’t need to read any lips to figure it out.

    And Gingrich, well there is a whole congressional record of two faced dealings concerning this low life. He would stab anyone in the back if it meant money in his pocket. We can’t trust Gingrich with the highest office in the world. I wouldn’t trust him to house sit.

    To top it off, none of these three can beat Obama because they are all for the same things as Obama other than the hot button social issues. They all want preemptive war, assassinations, torture, mountains of debt, corporate rule, and global empire.

    Vote for any of them, get more of the same. So why vote at all?