Comments on: Ron Paul’s racist newsletters come back to haunt him

By: Carl Nemo **==

Carl Nemo **== — Mon, 26 Dec 2011 23:42:19 +0000

Thanks Woody188 for the link. It demonstrates as to how the MSM can take short excerpts from an interview in order to create ‘false tenor’ in terms of contention relative to the interviewed that they wish to ‘target’…no? In this case Congressman Ron Paul.

Cunning sob’s indeed…no? / : |

Carl Nemo **==

By: woody188

woody188 — Mon, 26 Dec 2011 21:08:45 +0000

The unedited CNN interview seems to show Paul as much less agitated.

By: Carl Nemo **==

Carl Nemo **== — Sun, 25 Dec 2011 03:00:37 +0000

Re: last paragraph

“Merry Christmas and a Happy and Successful New Year 2011 to you and yours my friend in thought…cheers! : )

should read:

Merry Christmas and a Happy and Successful New Year 2012 to you and yours my friend in thought…cheers! : )

My apologies Senegoid, the only excuse I can offer is that I’ve tipped one too many a bit early this Christmas Eve. I’m feelin’ gooooood! and hope you be too. : ))

Carl Nemo **==

By: Carl Nemo **==

Carl Nemo **== — Sun, 25 Dec 2011 02:54:52 +0000

An excellent laundry list of creeping totalitarianism in America Senegoid.

For an Australian you seemingly have a far better grasp concerning the dark order of the day stalking America than the average U.S. citizen.

Thanks for your spot-on input.

Merry Christmas and a Happy and Successful New Year 2011 to you and yours my friend in thought…cheers! : )

Carl Nemo **==

By: Senegoid

Senegoid — Sat, 24 Dec 2011 02:20:16 +0000

“Should it be called terrorism?

No. But it is theft and should be treated as theft of property.”

Exactly Woody.

The activist guy calls it “civil disobedience” while the FBI calls it “terrorism”. In reality it’s theft which can already be prosecuted under current property laws in an open and transparent manner.

The NDAA does not require proof, prosecution or transparency, how convenient.

In the months and years ahead who will have the term terrorist applied to them or their world view? And for what reasons?

“He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither.”

By: David Heath

David Heath — Fri, 23 Dec 2011 23:18:21 +0000

This is really dangerous. Ron Paul’s response proves he was complicit in the distribution of the racist material and strongly implicates him as being part of the neoconfederate movement. It is a well known fact that the fairly secretive neoconfederate movement is headquartered in Texas. One of their big mantras being “The South will rise again!” which refers to the overthrow of the US goverment. A job that the confederacy failed to do in the Civil War. What concerns me is that Ron Paul is no dunce. He knows EXACTLY what he is doing concerning his response to the allegations against him. People must understand that neoconfederism is VERY prominent in the South despite what people hear about the South. Ron Paul knows this and I feel that he anticipates this story helping him in those states in both the primary and general election. Make no mistake, the neoconfederates are a subversive group all the way.

By: woody188

woody188 — Fri, 23 Dec 2011 17:50:49 +0000

You had me up until stealing from farms became “openly rescuing a few animals from one of those farms as an act of civil disobedience.”

Should it be called terrorism?

No. But it is theft and should be treated as theft of property.

When I certified for my concealed carry permit, one of the questions I asked for clarification was “Could I shoot someone that was stealing my livestock?”

The answer was no, not unless I was threatened or in fear of my own life. But if it came to my family starving versus shooting someone to keep our livestock, one better believe I’m pulling the trigger, despite what it’s called in their mind.

By: Senegoid

Senegoid — Fri, 23 Dec 2011 14:28:32 +0000

Politics: the theater continues, sound and fury, bread and circuses. The racists, the sex feigns, mistresses, inhaling, not inhaling, having sexual relations, not having sexual relations (with that women) – cigars – all good fun, entertaining, but nothing to do with policy.

And it’s RP’s policies that the power elite fear most. The racist stuff is a convenient distraction – is it not?

RP’s policies will most likely RiP. The Powers That Be will see to that.

Joining the neo-conservative dots:

Project for a New America Century – full spectrum dominance – Supreme Court elects GWB – 9/11 – Patriot Act – illegal wire taps – Iraqi War – FBI warns of endemic fraud in the mortgage industry – Fusion Centers – Military Commissions Act 2006 – more Fusion Centers – extension of Patriot Act – FEMA Centers – massive US taxpayer bail out of fraudant banks – bankers rewards themselves with record bonuses – Tea Party – Occupy Wall St – Fusion Centers now in all US states – Nation Defense Authorization Act 2012 – game over.

It would appear animals now have far more rights in the US than the citizens:

“FBI Says Activists Who Investigate Factory Farms Can Be Prosecuted as Terrorists:

http://www.greenisthenewred.com/blog/fbi-undercover-investigators-animal-enterprise-terrorism-act/5440/

“It is deeply sobering to see one’s name in an FBI file proposing terrorism charges,” he said in an email. “It is even more sobering to realize the supposedly terroristic activities in question are merely exposing the horrific cruelty of factory farms, educating the public about what goes on behind those closed doors, and openly rescuing a few animals from one of those farms as an act of civil disobedience.”…

This document illustrates how the backlash against effective activism has progressed within the animal rights movement. However, if this type of legislation is not overturned, it will set a precedent for corporations to use this model against Occupy Wall Street and anyone else who threaten business as usual.”

The Nobel Peace Prize winner has been chosen to carry on the policies of GWB – my money’s on BO to win another term – now that big money and big war have control they intend on keeping it, totally.

Merry Xmas America, oops sorry, Happy Holidays – enjoy, for these will be the last before the War on Terror, and related military occupation comes to the US homeland.

Soon we will all be defined as terrorist – it will be for our own safety.

Next year is the year of the Dragon – it may well be inflammatory: socially, enconomically, and militarily.

By: Bill Cravener

Bill Cravener — Fri, 23 Dec 2011 09:37:35 +0000

The more I know of Ron Paul the more eccentric I find that old man to be.

By: Editor

Editor — Fri, 23 Dec 2011 02:40:43 +0000

This excuse is, from our point of view, a common mantra of the Ron Paul faithful: The claim that he has “answered the media’s question concerning the remarks multiple times over the past 20 years.”

As is so typical in politics, the claim has some truth in it, but not all of the truth. Yes, Ron Paul has answered the question multiple times. The problem is that he has given multiple — and different — answers. First, as quoted in the Dallas Morning News, he was “taken out of context.” Then, as quoted in the Texas Monthly, he only wrote “some of the articles.” Now he’s claiming he didn’t write any of them and never even read them.

So, yes, he’s answered the questions multiple times. And he’s given various multiple answers.

So which of these differing answers are we to believe?