Spilling our blood to protect their oil

With oil hovering at the $100-a-barrel mark, we're inundated by calls for a "Manhattan Project" on alternative energy, more regulation of major oil companies and an end to our military presence in the Gulf.

The assumptions are that America's energy demand drives prices, the "majors" determine supply and instability in the Middle East explains recent spikes. So, if this is all our doing, then it can all be our undoing as well.

Would that Washington was so eminently in control of global energy markets.

The big driver on oil prices today is rising Asia's burgeoning demand. At the Cold War's end, Asia accounted for 10 percent of global oil demand. Today it gobbles up double that share. Before 2025, Asia will become the oil market's global demand center, dislodging North America.

So it's basically our blood, their oil.

A second big driver is that many key producers are themselves becoming significant consumers, shriveling their capacity for exports. Indonesia became a net importer years ago while Mexico, a huge supplier for the United States, will head down the same path unless it soon opens up its national oil company (NOC) to foreign direct investment.

Meanwhile, strongman Hugo Chavez diminishes Venezuela's future export capacity by scaring off investors and — in essence — eating his seed corn: funneling today's windfall profits into socialist programs designed to buttress his popular standing. His latest scheme involves Venezuela's NOC using its logistical networks to import foodstuffs currently in short supply.

Fire-breathing Mahmoud Ahmadinejad pursues a similarly shortsighted course in Iran to predictable outcomes.

In general, all of the big producers are seeing their oil consumption skyrocket far above global growth, with Saudi Arabia, Russia and Norway leading the way. So while rising Asia demands a lot more oil, the biggest sources have trouble boosting production.

What can the major oil companies do about any of this? Not as much as you think.

Increasingly, it's the home-team NOCs that control the bulk of reserves. Today, these state-owned firms directly manage 40 percent of the world's known supply. By 2030, that percentage will rise to roughly three-quarters, meaning Exxon Mobil, BP and others will be squeezed out of new big projects as NOCs grow rich enough to finance these on their own. Already, a significant chunk of the majors' current production is locked into sharing agreements that favor the NOCs as prices rise.

As the NOCs grab more control over future production, the majors face more restricted access to existing oil fields, pushing them toward increasingly complex ventures to discover new supplies, ventures involving tougher geology, deeper sea beds and harsher arctic environments.

Those tougher conditions drive up production costs just as a worldwide shortage of rigs and workers emerges. Toss in years of under-investing by everybody — NOCs and majors alike — in refining capacity, and this situation won't be remedied anytime soon.

Do continuing violence and threats in the Middle East add a surcharge on top of all of this? Sure, although the real problem comes in instability or "rogue regimes" keeping certain countries essentially off-line from comprehensive exploration, something the NOCs increasingly accomplish even in stable nations.

How about trusting in OPEC's ability to boost production sufficiently to cover rising global demand?

Growing international concern over global warming, combined with Asia's ballooning car fleet and associated air pollution, casts a long-term shadow over the oil industry. Simply put, it's hard to imagine Asia quadrupling its automobiles over the next two decades and surviving the resulting environmental degradation, even if it could import enough oil.

For the increasingly squeezed majors, it doesn't make sense to stick out their necks on long-term investments to grow supply-side infrastructure. Instead, watch them invariably warm up to new vehicle drive technologies that major automakers pursue in their greed to stay on top.

As for NOCs, expect them to invest in just enough production capacity just enough to keep prices from rising too far above $100 a barrel but not enough to drive them much below that mark.

In sum, crude prices will remain relatively high for the long run as everybody involved ekes out maximum profits across the final decades of oil's supremacy.

As for what comes next, watch Asia, because America's strictly in the backseat on this tumultuous ride.


(Thomas P.M. Barnett is a distinguished strategist at the Oak Ridge Center for Advanced Studies and senior managing director of Enterra Solutions LLC. Contact him at tom(at)thomaspmbarnett.com.)


  1. adamrussell

    The other side of this coin is that opening up alaskan and offshore drilling wont get us lower prices. It will just go to the highest bidder. It is unfortunate that the oil that WE own can only be sold by private companies who of course take the profits, and give us no control over who it gets sold to.

  2. pollchecker

    I REPEAT — Did anyone know that we dispose of 11 BILLION liters of cooking oil annually? Did anyone know that vegetable oil which can be made out of practically ANY TYPE OF PLANT can be run in diesel cars? Did anyone know how easy it is to convert a regular car to run on biodiesel?

    Did anyone see the story about General Motors investing in a company that turns trash into biodiesel?

    Ever hear of house shingles with solar cells on them that can generate enough electricity to run an entire household?

    There are options out there if we have the will to make the changes.

    But this country has never been proactive in anything. So I doubt that anything significant will get done until the price of oil is so high that it sinks our economy.

    I just saw a movie about how a secret war drove the Soviet Union to economic bankruptcy and the collapse of the USSR.

    Perhaps the secret war is to drive the price of oil so high that our economy completely collapes.

    I always thought it was odd that there was a movie out about the consequences of a Katrina like storm on the price of oil just 3 months before Katrina hit the gulf coast.

    I’m not suggesting any conspiracy, but when I read headlines about how one trader deliberately drove the price of oil up to $100 a barrel just so he would make history, I have to wonder what is really going on.

    Then there are some that have suggested that this is all just plain class warfare. If so, too bad the masses don’t have a clue.