Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone

Secrecy is not a right

By
January 11, 2008

One of the least attractive aspects of President Bush’s administration has been its obsessive and unnecessary secrecy, and it’s hardly likely to do his legacy any good.

Bush could go a long way toward rectifying that by adopting and implementing the recommendations of the joint presidential-congressional Public Interest Declassification Board issued this week.

Universally, it is agreed that the federal government needlessly classifies far too much information and then is glacial about declassifying it. The Bush administration didn’t help matters when, shortly after it took office, it instructed agencies to err on the side of secrecy.

Not only is it too easy for bureaucrats to wield a classified stamp, there are no uniform standards for what should be kept secret and what should not. There are good reasons, national security being foremost, for withholding certain information for at least a time. But the fact is, these are taxpayer-paid public records and in time the public, in the form of historians, researchers, journalists and the merely curious, deserves access to them.

The board calls for uniform standards for classifying documents and a computerized system for keeping track of them. A National Declassification Center would then be responsible for systematically declassifying them.

One useful recommendation would be to build a single secure facility to house all classified presidential records for the duration of a president’s term. As the documents are declassified, they would be turned over to the appropriate presidential library. This would serve the dual function of both securing the documents and preserving them. This is, after all, our history.

3 Responses to Secrecy is not a right

  1. Carl Nemo

    January 12, 2008 at 3:15 am

    deleted by poster due to being off topic

  2. WWWexler

    January 12, 2008 at 8:26 am

    Good points, all.

    Classification policy should be standard by law, not by presidential edict. This administration has used classification to obfuscate its own misdeeds. A case in point is the battle that some groups waged for some years to obtain the list of attendees to Cheney’s secret energy meetings. What possible reason can there be for classifying that information? These people met to discuss public policy; the transcript of the meetings should be public information. They are treating it like proprietary business communication.

    Bush’s manipulation of his classification power is directly contrary to the law. (What a surprise, eh?) We are at the beginning of a new struggle over millions of emails that by law belong to the American people. Will they be found or have they been destroyed? If they are found, will Bush fork them over or will he claim “Executive Privilege”? Or will he say they are classified? Remember, these emails very likely contain a number of smoking guns, including an electronic trail to the White House concerning their role in the selective leaking of classified information.

    You can read about presidential records law at the link below.

    http://www.archives.gov/about/laws/presidential-records.html

    -Wexler

  3. neondog

    January 12, 2008 at 10:33 am

    I agree that Bush incorporates a secretive regime and probably takes his cue from his Nixonian VP. (“Destroy the video tape, George”)

    What is really laughable is Dale’s attempt at criticizing his man, George Bush. This scathing blast (wink)from Dale certainly indicates that George is a lame duck.