<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ron Paul: U.S. involvement in Libya was still a mistake</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/41810/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/41810</link>
	<description>The oldest political news site on the Internet because nobody&#039;s life, liberty or property is safe while Congress is in session.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:14:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Nemo **==</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/41810/comment-page-1#comment-173706</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Nemo **==</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 18:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=41810#comment-173706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seemingly the word is used as both a noun and as a transitive verb in our times.  Here&#039;s a little etymological background on the word gift. 

Gift:
 
From the Old English &quot;asgift,&quot; meaning, &quot;payment for a wife&quot; in the singular and meaning &quot;wedding&quot; in the plural. The Middle Dutch &quot;gift,&quot; now written as &quot;gif,&quot; meant the same, but today means &quot;poison.&quot; The Old High German &quot;gift&quot; also became &quot;poison.&quot; From the root &quot;geb-&quot;, from which in English we get &quot;give.&quot; There is another German word, however, which incorporates the word &quot;gift&quot;, but which retains the older meaning of &quot;payment for a wife&quot;. The word is &quot;Mitgift&quot;, which is the modern German word for &quot;dowry&quot;. 

***
 
gift (g ft) 
n. 
1. Something that is bestowed voluntarily and without compensation. 
2. The act, right, or power of giving. 
3. A talent, endowment, aptitude, or inclination. 
tr.v. gift·ed, gift·ing, gifts 
1. To present something as a gift to. 
2. To endow with. 

[Middle English, from Old Norse; see ghabh- in Indo-European roots.]	 

I used the term &#039;gifting life&#039; in a somewhat facetious sense when relating it to humans at the moment of their primal ecstacy, having little thought to the consequences for the most part for themselves and society in general.  It&#039;s said the first and the last child are generally a mistake with those in between planned, although that&#039;s up for debate too when dealing with welfare mothers with eight plus children spanning from age 14 to their late thirties. Ah...the cost of maintaining a &#039;civilized&#039; society...no? / : &#124;  

Carl Nemo **==]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seemingly the word is used as both a noun and as a transitive verb in our times.  Here&#8217;s a little etymological background on the word gift. </p>
<p>Gift:</p>
<p>From the Old English &#8220;asgift,&#8221; meaning, &#8220;payment for a wife&#8221; in the singular and meaning &#8220;wedding&#8221; in the plural. The Middle Dutch &#8220;gift,&#8221; now written as &#8220;gif,&#8221; meant the same, but today means &#8220;poison.&#8221; The Old High German &#8220;gift&#8221; also became &#8220;poison.&#8221; From the root &#8220;geb-&#8221;, from which in English we get &#8220;give.&#8221; There is another German word, however, which incorporates the word &#8220;gift&#8221;, but which retains the older meaning of &#8220;payment for a wife&#8221;. The word is &#8220;Mitgift&#8221;, which is the modern German word for &#8220;dowry&#8221;. </p>
<p>***</p>
<p>gift (g ft)<br />
n.<br />
1. Something that is bestowed voluntarily and without compensation.<br />
2. The act, right, or power of giving.<br />
3. A talent, endowment, aptitude, or inclination.<br />
tr.v. gift·ed, gift·ing, gifts<br />
1. To present something as a gift to.<br />
2. To endow with. </p>
<p>[Middle English, from Old Norse; see ghabh- in Indo-European roots.]	 </p>
<p>I used the term &#8216;gifting life&#8217; in a somewhat facetious sense when relating it to humans at the moment of their primal ecstacy, having little thought to the consequences for the most part for themselves and society in general.  It&#8217;s said the first and the last child are generally a mistake with those in between planned, although that&#8217;s up for debate too when dealing with welfare mothers with eight plus children spanning from age 14 to their late thirties. Ah&#8230;the cost of maintaining a &#8216;civilized&#8217; society&#8230;no? / : |  </p>
<p>Carl Nemo **==</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Almandine</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/41810/comment-page-1#comment-173705</link>
		<dc:creator>Almandine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=41810#comment-173705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Carl -

My point was entirely about the debate surrounding &quot;when life begins&quot; as a biological, not spiritual, function. &quot;Intent to reproduce&quot; is not the controlling issue regarding the newly created human being; it is only the fact that procreation has happened at all that makes the question meaningful with regard to terminating that life. Logically speaking, life must have existed prior to the &quot;coupling&quot;... ergo, if the debate about the ending that life via abortion is a legal question that hinges on &quot;when life begins&quot;, it must in fact be answered - at the moment of impregnation.  

Under natural law, the upshot of such termination would be murder; under societal law, it&#039;s who has the best politics. We know the current answer to that one.

On a related front, perhaps you can help me out with something I&#039;ve been puzzling over for some time now: I thought &quot;gift&quot; was a noun and &quot;give&quot; was the verb. How did gift squirm its way into verbhood?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Carl -</p>
<p>My point was entirely about the debate surrounding &#8220;when life begins&#8221; as a biological, not spiritual, function. &#8220;Intent to reproduce&#8221; is not the controlling issue regarding the newly created human being; it is only the fact that procreation has happened at all that makes the question meaningful with regard to terminating that life. Logically speaking, life must have existed prior to the &#8220;coupling&#8221;&#8230; ergo, if the debate about the ending that life via abortion is a legal question that hinges on &#8220;when life begins&#8221;, it must in fact be answered &#8211; at the moment of impregnation.  </p>
<p>Under natural law, the upshot of such termination would be murder; under societal law, it&#8217;s who has the best politics. We know the current answer to that one.</p>
<p>On a related front, perhaps you can help me out with something I&#8217;ve been puzzling over for some time now: I thought &#8220;gift&#8221; was a noun and &#8220;give&#8221; was the verb. How did gift squirm its way into verbhood?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Nemo **==</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/41810/comment-page-1#comment-173701</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Nemo **==</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=41810#comment-173701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gee Al you are certainly elevating the act of procreation to a highly &#039;spiritual&#039; level between two consenting adults. Assuredly they have their oars in the water when engaged in this lust driven act, generally not sullied by in depth analysis as to the end result of their coupling; I.E., &#039;gifting life&#039; to a future being. Then seemingly aborted couplings are far cheaper and less socially traumatizing than a viable fetus. / : &#124;

It would probably work if both parties had the intellect and self control of &quot;Spock&quot;...no?

Carl Nemo **==]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee Al you are certainly elevating the act of procreation to a highly &#8216;spiritual&#8217; level between two consenting adults. Assuredly they have their oars in the water when engaged in this lust driven act, generally not sullied by in depth analysis as to the end result of their coupling; I.E., &#8216;gifting life&#8217; to a future being. Then seemingly aborted couplings are far cheaper and less socially traumatizing than a viable fetus. / : |</p>
<p>It would probably work if both parties had the intellect and self control of &#8220;Spock&#8221;&#8230;no?</p>
<p>Carl Nemo **==</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Almandine</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/41810/comment-page-1#comment-173692</link>
		<dc:creator>Almandine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 13:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=41810#comment-173692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mumbled like a true progressive...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mumbled like a true progressive&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Almandine</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/41810/comment-page-1#comment-173682</link>
		<dc:creator>Almandine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 03:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=41810#comment-173682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Life actually predates conception, being the condition of both procreants well before the act of procreation. Their gifts of life - passed on to their offspring - could not have happened otherwise.

 Sex ain&#039;t really the Big Bang.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Life actually predates conception, being the condition of both procreants well before the act of procreation. Their gifts of life &#8211; passed on to their offspring &#8211; could not have happened otherwise.</p>
<p> Sex ain&#8217;t really the Big Bang.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Almandine</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/41810/comment-page-1#comment-173681</link>
		<dc:creator>Almandine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 03:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=41810#comment-173681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you God.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Nemo **==</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/41810/comment-page-1#comment-173680</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Nemo **==</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 03:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=41810#comment-173680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since that&#039;s been my status since 1995, I heartily agree... : ) 

Carl Nemo **==]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since that&#8217;s been my status since 1995, I heartily agree&#8230; : ) </p>
<p>Carl Nemo **==</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/41810/comment-page-1#comment-173679</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 02:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=41810#comment-173679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[22 days later isn&#039;t at conception either.

Exactly when and where life begins is highly debateable.  Some say life only really begins when you retire.

J.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>22 days later isn&#8217;t at conception either.</p>
<p>Exactly when and where life begins is highly debateable.  Some say life only really begins when you retire.</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Nemo **==</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/41810/comment-page-1#comment-173676</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Nemo **==</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 02:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=41810#comment-173676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to differ with you on this one Jon.  Seemingly the human heart begins to beat on the 22nd day post fertilziation of the embryo. 

Here&#039;s a link with a time table from initial fertilization to the full development of a child in utero. 
 http://www.nrlc.org/abortion/facts/fetaldevelopment.html

Masturbation into a &#039;sock&#039; is simply an act of sexual self-titillation with no possibility of another being coming from the process.  So it&#039;s like comparing oranges to less than apples. / : &#124; 

I&#039;m not pro life due to the burgeoning overpopulation of planet earth.  If societies don&#039;t make an effort get haphazard procreation under some type of serious control then the citizens of earth will literally eat themselves out of their home, the earth. Currently the planetary population is around 7 billion with 10.5 billion projected by 2050, possibly sooner. Inflation alone will result in the price of commodities to skyrocket which will foment civil wars and unrest across the globe. The end result will be mighty resource wars competing for the last easily exploitable resources, an ugly scenario indeed. 

Carl Nemo **==]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to differ with you on this one Jon.  Seemingly the human heart begins to beat on the 22nd day post fertilziation of the embryo. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a link with a time table from initial fertilization to the full development of a child in utero.<br />
 <a href="http://www.nrlc.org/abortion/facts/fetaldevelopment.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nrlc.org/abortion/facts/fetaldevelopment.html</a></p>
<p>Masturbation into a &#8216;sock&#8217; is simply an act of sexual self-titillation with no possibility of another being coming from the process.  So it&#8217;s like comparing oranges to less than apples. / : | </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not pro life due to the burgeoning overpopulation of planet earth.  If societies don&#8217;t make an effort get haphazard procreation under some type of serious control then the citizens of earth will literally eat themselves out of their home, the earth. Currently the planetary population is around 7 billion with 10.5 billion projected by 2050, possibly sooner. Inflation alone will result in the price of commodities to skyrocket which will foment civil wars and unrest across the globe. The end result will be mighty resource wars competing for the last easily exploitable resources, an ugly scenario indeed. </p>
<p>Carl Nemo **==</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/41810/comment-page-1#comment-173674</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 23:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=41810#comment-173674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Except that abortion isn&#039;t murder, any more than masturbating into a sock is.  Life does not begin at conception.

J.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except that abortion isn&#8217;t murder, any more than masturbating into a sock is.  Life does not begin at conception.</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
