Race is still an issue with Obama

In light of Barack Obama’s victory in the Iowa caucuses, I am revisiting a column I wrote on Oct. 29, 2006, about Obama’s presidential candidacy. I argued that his overnight rise to national prominence has everything to do with race, that many whites will vote for him because he does not make them feel uncomfortable.

I have not changed my mind.

Obama’s success in Iowa puts the campaign’s racial subtext in sharp relief. This is a complex issue most Americans would rather avoid. I am writing about it because we need to stop playing games with race — America’s rawest nerve — and deal with it forthrightly.

If Obama becomes the next president, he will do so primarily because of white support, especially the support of whites eager to prove that they are fair.

The fact is — which is good for the nation in the long run — large numbers of white people like the Democratic senator from Illinois. Many whites see Obama, like Colin Powell before him, as a black who has transcended race. He is the rare black politician who is not seen as a “black leader,” a designation of contempt reserved for the likes of Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and Louis Farrakhan.

Obama is what many blacks, along with some whites, pejoratively refer to as “an honorary white man,” one who can soothe white people. In the parlance of race studies, he is a “good black” rather than a “bad black.” Thus far, Obama, unlike Powell, has not dealt with this part of his appeal to whites. During an interview with Ebony magazine in 1995, Powell said: “I speak reasonably well, like a white person, and (visually), I ain’t that black.” Blacks such as Powell and Obama defy all of the negative black stereotypes. Powell is the child of Caribbean immigrants, and Obama is the child of a white Kansan and a black Kenyan. Neither has the tragic baggage of American slavery in their pedigree. Both are light-skinned and have what we blacks refer to as “good hair.” They are physically pleasing to most whites.

Both succeeded in bastions of white power. Obama earned degrees from Ivy League universities and serves in the U.S. Senate, a white man’s club. Powell rose to the highest position for a commissioned officer in the U.S. military.

And, for sure, neither Powell nor Obama is ideologically black.

Readers who will accuse me of harping on race need to know that Michelle Obama herself, the candidate’s wife, an American black, is fully aware of the role that race is playing in black America during this campaign.

When a TV host asked her in November to explain why her husband was trailing Hillary Rodham Clinton by 46 percent to 37 percent among blacks, she was unequivocal.

“First of all, I think that that’s not going to hold,” she said. “I’m completely confident. Black America will wake up and get (it). But what we’re dealing with in the black community is just the natural fear of possibility. You know, when I look at my life, the stuff that we’re seeing in these polls has played out my whole life. You know, always being told by somebody that I’m not ready, that I can’t do something, my scores weren’t high enough.

“You know, there’s always that doubt in the back of the minds of people of color. People who’ve been oppressed and haven’t been given real opportunities. That you never really believe. That you believe that somehow, someone is better than you. You know, deep down inside, you doubt whether you can do it, because that’s all you’ve been told, is ‘No, wait.’ That’s all you hear, and you hear it from people you love. Not because they don’t care about you, but because they’re afraid. They’re afraid something might happen. … That’s the psychology that’s going on in our heads, in our souls, and I understand it. I know where it comes from, and I think that it’s one of the horrible legacies of racism and discrimination and oppression.”

Here, the cogent observations of Peter Beinart, a columnist for the New Republic, are useful. He makes the point that Obama, unlike past black presidential candidates, enjoys a transformed political and racial climate and has been able to avoid issues that force black candidates to become divisive and “ideologically black.” One big change is that crime is not resonating as a political issue, Beinart writes. Earlier, however, blacks, along with other Democrats, had to prove that they were tough on crime to placate white voters.

“Had Obama run for president in 1992,” Beinart says, “he would have had to do something akin to Bill Clinton’s infamous execution of mentally retarded murderer Ricky Ray Rector — which would have hurt him with blacks. Today, by contrast, he can largely oppose the death penalty with hardly anyone seeming to mind.” Obama also does not have to face the divisiveness of welfare reform. As a result, Beinart writes, racist rhetoric and motivations have been removed from the debate over taxing and spending, and whites are less prone to accuse blacks of being too dependent on the government.

“That’s good news for all Democrats, but especially for Obama, who would be particularly vulnerable to suspicions that he was trying to redistribute money from whites to blacks,” Beinart says.

When the South Carolina presidential primary rolls around on Jan. 26, race will be a major factor in the Democratic primary because 51 percent of the state’s registered Democrats are black, and they are expected to make up the majority of voters on the Democratic side.

“South Carolina’s contest is as close to a ‘black primary’ as we’re going to get in 2008 — the only time in the entire campaign, almost certainly, when Democrats will be fighting all-out for African-American votes,” according to the latest issue of the Nation magazine.

So, instead of pretending that Obama’s skin color does not matter, we should use this campaign as an opportunity to be publicly honest about race and the unique role it plays in national electoral politics.

(Bill Maxwell is a columnist and editorial writer for the St. Petersburg Times. E-mail bmaxwell(at)sptimes.com.)

10 Responses to "Race is still an issue with Obama"

  1. SEAL  January 8, 2008 at 4:26 pm

    Obama/Edwards would be the perfect ticket. I wonder if they’re too far apart on the health care thing for that to happen? I would love to see Edwards as VP engineering a national health care plan while Obama ends the war, plays with congress, and stabalizes the Middle East to bring the price of oil down.

  2. ekaton  January 8, 2008 at 12:29 pm

    I don’t know Obama. He’s probably a very good man who means well, but look who he’s chosen to surround his campaign.

    I get a real creepy feeling about Obama. He looks like a Manchurian Candidate to me.

    Take a look at Obama’s top advisors.

    Mark Brzezinski, son of Zbigniew, former Clinton NSC official and top Obama advisor. Architect of the 2004 “people power” color revolution/coup in Ukraine. Main goal: THE DESTRUCTION OF RUSSIA.

    Secretary of State for African Affairs, Susan Rice. She wants to bomb Sudan.

    Richard Clarke, former terror advisor of the Clinton and Bush administrations. Main accomplishment: originating the official myth of 9/11.

    Dennis Ross, former Middle East negotiator for Bush and Clinton. Main goal: play the Arabs against the Iranians to perpetuate Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza.

    — Kent Shaw

  3. LurkingFromTheLeft  January 8, 2008 at 2:23 pm

    Thanks Kent –

    …you’ve managed to help identify why I just can’t get all warm and oozy over Obama –

    …he looks good, speaks well, but something just stops me from falling under his spell – OR their plans for him –

    …I’m still speaking up for Bill Richardson –

    …hell, if Obama’s handlers would offer Richardson the other slot, I might actually feel like believing we can fly –

    LFTL

  4. jzelensk  January 8, 2008 at 1:28 pm

    Still waiting for Obama to show up.

    Obama seems like a nice enough guy, certainly a better candidate than any Republican, but his positions so far do not reflect an individual who wishes to see fundamental change – in health care, in US imperialism, in the corporate takeover of America, in big money in politics.

  5. bryan mcclellan  January 8, 2008 at 1:40 pm

    Please don’t forget that Jesse Jackson,Al Sharpton, Oprah,and the corporate borg among many others are waiting in the wings to manipulate him.They are licking their collective chops at the chance to make him in their image,and he will have to be very strong willed to avoid the knives in the back.It would tickle me pink if he possesses the resolve to ignore the panderers.

  6. Donnat  January 8, 2008 at 3:13 pm

    I think Obama is genuine and shows great leadership qualities. His race was never an issue with me and it only made me uneasy that Oprah fell head over heels in love with him, as I’m not an Oprah fan. However, if she’s got so much influce that she’s responsible for giving him this boost, he ought to make her his VP running mate.

    Oprah aside, I still think he’s got ‘something’ and it will propel him to the top.
    Donnat

  7. DejaVuAllOver  January 8, 2008 at 3:31 pm

    Well said, Kent Shaw. That was a five-star comment! Scary folks, indeed.

  8. DejaVuAllOver  January 8, 2008 at 3:37 pm

    I think Edwards is a late bloomer. Once Hillary is exiled to the floor underneath the dining-room table licking her wounds, the Edwards / Obama race will get interesting. I hope so. I think Edwards is the guy for me. Not because he’s white, but because he’s the only one seriously proposing major changes in our labor laws. Perhaps Obama will step up to the plate, but I see his recent stardom as a political Brittney Spears. It won’t last.

  9. ekaton  January 8, 2008 at 5:01 pm

    When I get a chance to hear him talk I like Richardson. But the big-money-managed-and-owned press has already decided who the frontrunners are to be.

    — Kent Shaw

  10. LurkingFromTheLeft  January 8, 2008 at 5:21 pm

    I knew you were

    …a smart fella!

    LFTL

Comments are closed.