<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#8217;s shifts complicate debt limit negotiations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/41497/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/41497</link>
	<description>The oldest political news site on the Internet because nobody&#039;s life, liberty or property is safe while Congress is in session.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 03:27:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Almandine</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/41497/comment-page-1#comment-168238</link>
		<dc:creator>Almandine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=41497#comment-168238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Say it ain&#039;t so...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Say it ain&#8217;t so&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: b mcclellan</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/41497/comment-page-1#comment-168173</link>
		<dc:creator>b mcclellan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 03:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=41497#comment-168173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Easy Al, at least we&#039;ve established the President has a working transmission. 
Now we are forced to wonder, 
five speed, or an infinity of gears racing headlong to constitutional entropy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Easy Al, at least we&#8217;ve established the President has a working transmission.<br />
Now we are forced to wonder,<br />
five speed, or an infinity of gears racing headlong to constitutional entropy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Nemo</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/41497/comment-page-1#comment-168141</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Nemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=41497#comment-168141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read that too Woody, but to me it&#039;s typical of modern era grifters as we have in office reaching into the past in order to justify their modern era financial crimes in high places.  The 14th Amendment was linked to the &quot;Reconstruction Era&quot; post the Civil War.    

Regardless, if we don&#039;t get taken out this time, we&#039;ll assuredly go down within a few years or less.  First it will be the collapse of the Euro currency, then the mighty tsunami wave of sovereign default will wash over our shores.  The entire Western finanacial paradigm is held together with bandaids and bailing wire so to speak via red hot, unsecured, unregulated derivatives between faceless counterparties.  They&#039;ve turned high finance into a casino albeit a crooked one relative to the little people who are trapped within their criminally disposed paradigm.  

Thanks for further input to the discussion. 

Carl Nemo **==]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read that too Woody, but to me it&#8217;s typical of modern era grifters as we have in office reaching into the past in order to justify their modern era financial crimes in high places.  The 14th Amendment was linked to the &#8220;Reconstruction Era&#8221; post the Civil War.    </p>
<p>Regardless, if we don&#8217;t get taken out this time, we&#8217;ll assuredly go down within a few years or less.  First it will be the collapse of the Euro currency, then the mighty tsunami wave of sovereign default will wash over our shores.  The entire Western finanacial paradigm is held together with bandaids and bailing wire so to speak via red hot, unsecured, unregulated derivatives between faceless counterparties.  They&#8217;ve turned high finance into a casino albeit a crooked one relative to the little people who are trapped within their criminally disposed paradigm.  </p>
<p>Thanks for further input to the discussion. </p>
<p>Carl Nemo **==</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: woody188</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/41497/comment-page-1#comment-168128</link>
		<dc:creator>woody188</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=41497#comment-168128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;“The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for the payments of pension and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion shall not be questioned”&lt;/blockquote&gt;Of course they are twisting the original meaning of this amendment, just like the commerce clause in forcing us to buy health insurance. All the 14th says is that the validity of the public debt should not be questioned. Meaning it does exist as valid public debt, not that it must continue into perpetuity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for the payments of pension and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion shall not be questioned”</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course they are twisting the original meaning of this amendment, just like the commerce clause in forcing us to buy health insurance. All the 14th says is that the validity of the public debt should not be questioned. Meaning it does exist as valid public debt, not that it must continue into perpetuity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/41497/comment-page-1#comment-168044</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=41497#comment-168044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As someone who is neither a &quot;hard line: Democrat nor Republican (I&#039;m registered as a Dem so I can at least have someone to vote for or against in Primaries) , I&#039;m as sick of hearing this political posturing (read: BS) as I am of hearing about Casey Dugard, to whom HLN devoted two whole weeks, almost 24/7. Enough, already! Give the Republicans their way (read: call their bluff) . When the USA has to pay 10% APR and the common citizen has to pay 25% APR on a loan, the Republican Party and the Tea Party will be ended for all eternity.
Yes, the Dems deserve some censure for running up the debt, but so do the Reps.
They sow the wind and will reap the whirlwind.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who is neither a &#8220;hard line: Democrat nor Republican (I&#8217;m registered as a Dem so I can at least have someone to vote for or against in Primaries) , I&#8217;m as sick of hearing this political posturing (read: BS) as I am of hearing about Casey Dugard, to whom HLN devoted two whole weeks, almost 24/7. Enough, already! Give the Republicans their way (read: call their bluff) . When the USA has to pay 10% APR and the common citizen has to pay 25% APR on a loan, the Republican Party and the Tea Party will be ended for all eternity.<br />
Yes, the Dems deserve some censure for running up the debt, but so do the Reps.<br />
They sow the wind and will reap the whirlwind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eve</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/41497/comment-page-1#comment-167918</link>
		<dc:creator>eve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 23:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=41497#comment-167918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m thinking the fact we are not being told the truth ....again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thinking the fact we are not being told the truth &#8230;.again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Nemo</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/41497/comment-page-1#comment-167716</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Nemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 01:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=41497#comment-167716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In addition here&#039;s a link to everthing one wants to know about U.S. Public Debt. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_public_debt

There&#039;s quite a bit of hollow financial &#039;promises&#039; that are &quot;off the books&quot; so to speak and will never be fulfilled...ever!

Carl Nemo **==]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition here&#8217;s a link to everthing one wants to know about U.S. Public Debt. </p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_public_debt" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_public_debt</a></p>
<p>There&#8217;s quite a bit of hollow financial &#8216;promises&#8217; that are &#8220;off the books&#8221; so to speak and will never be fulfilled&#8230;ever!</p>
<p>Carl Nemo **==</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Nemo</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/41497/comment-page-1#comment-167713</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Nemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 01:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=41497#comment-167713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently we&#039;ve heard former President Bill Clinton, Tim Geithner,  political pundits et al. referencing the 14th Amendment as some kind of &#039;get out of debt card&#039;...NOT!

I don&#039;t know where Bill Clinton, Geithner et al. get the idea that this  &quot;Reconstruction Era&quot; amendment has anything to do with the government defaulting on its debts.  Geithner comes up with &quot;debt shall not be questioned&quot;...say what?!  This guy is exemplary of a sitting &#039;village idiot&#039;, our Secretary of the U.S. Treasury.   He must have his Goldman Sachs brain plugged in...!  / : &#124;

All it makes reference to is the now archaic conditions of debt related to the post civil war era (Confederate financial losses),  slaves  etc.  The amendment is linked to the &quot;Reconstruction period&quot; post Civil War and has nothing do with this debt monstrosity they&#039;ve created in our modern times.  

following extract of the intent of the 14th amendment: 

&quot;Validity of public debt
Section 4 confirmed the legitimacy of all United States public debt appropriated by the Congress. It also confirmed that neither the United States nor any state would pay for the loss of slaves or debts that had been incurred by the Confederacy. For example, several English and French banks had lent money to the South during the war.[48] In Perry v. United States (1935), the Supreme Court ruled that under Section 4 voiding a United States government bond &quot;went beyond the congressional power.&quot;[49]  ...extract from Wiki article

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

I&#039;ve spent a bit of time reading and rereading the 14th and all I can say this is typcial b.s. from the lips of Bill Clinton et al. of the same stripe. 

We need massive cuts in expenditures both in the present and future along with a Constitutional amendment that mandates a balanced budget and plan to reduce the public debt over time...period!

Carl Nemo **==]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently we&#8217;ve heard former President Bill Clinton, Tim Geithner,  political pundits et al. referencing the 14th Amendment as some kind of &#8216;get out of debt card&#8217;&#8230;NOT!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know where Bill Clinton, Geithner et al. get the idea that this  &#8220;Reconstruction Era&#8221; amendment has anything to do with the government defaulting on its debts.  Geithner comes up with &#8220;debt shall not be questioned&#8221;&#8230;say what?!  This guy is exemplary of a sitting &#8216;village idiot&#8217;, our Secretary of the U.S. Treasury.   He must have his Goldman Sachs brain plugged in&#8230;!  / : |</p>
<p>All it makes reference to is the now archaic conditions of debt related to the post civil war era (Confederate financial losses),  slaves  etc.  The amendment is linked to the &#8220;Reconstruction period&#8221; post Civil War and has nothing do with this debt monstrosity they&#8217;ve created in our modern times.  </p>
<p>following extract of the intent of the 14th amendment: </p>
<p>&#8220;Validity of public debt<br />
Section 4 confirmed the legitimacy of all United States public debt appropriated by the Congress. It also confirmed that neither the United States nor any state would pay for the loss of slaves or debts that had been incurred by the Confederacy. For example, several English and French banks had lent money to the South during the war.[48] In Perry v. United States (1935), the Supreme Court ruled that under Section 4 voiding a United States government bond &#8220;went beyond the congressional power.&#8221;[49]  &#8230;extract from Wiki article</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve spent a bit of time reading and rereading the 14th and all I can say this is typcial b.s. from the lips of Bill Clinton et al. of the same stripe. </p>
<p>We need massive cuts in expenditures both in the present and future along with a Constitutional amendment that mandates a balanced budget and plan to reduce the public debt over time&#8230;period!</p>
<p>Carl Nemo **==</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Almandine</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/41497/comment-page-1#comment-167707</link>
		<dc:creator>Almandine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 00:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=41497#comment-167707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the &quot;inside&quot; story as to what went down.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the &#8220;inside&#8221; story as to what went down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pondering_It_All</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/41497/comment-page-1#comment-167704</link>
		<dc:creator>Pondering_It_All</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 23:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=41497#comment-167704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Obama&#039;s Shifts&quot;:  Isn&#039;t that just the negotiation process?  This article makes it sound like every time the Republicans agree to something, Obama changes his mind.  Actually, it has been pretty much the other way around.  Anything the Republicans propose that Obama then endorses, suddenly is unacceptable to the Republicans!  The Tea Party faction would say NO to apple pie and motherhood, if Obama endorsed them.  It doesn&#039;t take any rational thought:  It&#039;s just a reflex action.

If no debt-limit deal can be reached, that will be fine:  Obama can invoke the constitutional requirement for the US to honor all its debts.  Then at the end of 2012, the Bush/Obama tax cuts will automatically expire, so Obama will get his revenue increase.  All the House Republicans can do here is dig their own political graves.  Even Grover Norquist has said that letting the tax cuts expire will not violate his &quot;no tax increases&quot; pledge.  He can see the light at the end of the tunnel, and it&#039;s a train about to crush the GOP!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Obama&#8217;s Shifts&#8221;:  Isn&#8217;t that just the negotiation process?  This article makes it sound like every time the Republicans agree to something, Obama changes his mind.  Actually, it has been pretty much the other way around.  Anything the Republicans propose that Obama then endorses, suddenly is unacceptable to the Republicans!  The Tea Party faction would say NO to apple pie and motherhood, if Obama endorsed them.  It doesn&#8217;t take any rational thought:  It&#8217;s just a reflex action.</p>
<p>If no debt-limit deal can be reached, that will be fine:  Obama can invoke the constitutional requirement for the US to honor all its debts.  Then at the end of 2012, the Bush/Obama tax cuts will automatically expire, so Obama will get his revenue increase.  All the House Republicans can do here is dig their own political graves.  Even Grover Norquist has said that letting the tax cuts expire will not violate his &#8220;no tax increases&#8221; pledge.  He can see the light at the end of the tunnel, and it&#8217;s a train about to crush the GOP!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
