Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone

Wars, costs face new Pentagon chief

By DONNA CASSATA and LOLITA C. BALDOR
June 9, 2011

CIA Director and Defense Secretary-designate Leon Panetta (Reuters)

U.S. senators are warning the man nominated to be the next defense chief to be wary of draconian Pentagon budget cuts, laying down a gauntlet against the $400 billion in national security reductions that President Barack Obama has proposed.

Leaders of the Senate Armed Services Committee tell Leon Panetta the Pentagon must scrutinize the budget for potential efficiencies. But they also say the U.S. cannot afford to slice into the muscle of America’s military power.

Republican Sen. John McCain of Arizona says defense spending is not what is sinking the nation into fiscal crisis.

Panetta was appearing before the panel for a hearing on his nomination to succeed Robert Gates as defense secretary. Panetta currently heads the CIA.

THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP’s earlier story is below.

Leon Panetta, President Barack Obama’s choice to be the next Pentagon chief, says every part of the defense budget “must be on the table,” including possible changes in military pay and benefits, as the administration grapples with spending cuts to deal with soaring deficits.

Panetta’s skill as a budget cutter, honed as chairman of the House Budget Committee and one-time head of the White House Office of Management and Budget, will be sorely tested as even defense spending feels the political and financial pressures of the nation’s economic woes. Panetta, who is the current CIA director, also faces a hefty agenda of three wars — in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya — and certification that the military is ready to deal with openly gay members in its ranks.

Panetta was to testify Thursday before the Senate Armed Services Committee at his confirmation hearing. Republicans and Democrats saw no obstacles to quick Senate approval of Panetta, who would succeed Robert Gates. After 4 1/2 years through the Bush and Obama administrations, Gates plans to retire on June 30.

While Panetta’s Senate path looked clear, the road ahead at the Pentagon was filled with far-reaching decisions, including moving toward Obama’s call to slash an additional $400 billion from defense over the next 12 years.

“If we are going to manage costs, I believe everything must be on the table,” Panetta said in a questionnaire submitted to the Senate committee. “It may be appropriate to conduct a comprehensive review of the military pay and benefits structure to determine where costs can be contained.”

He added that any move to change military benefits must be done carefully. Controlling health care costs is a sensible way to save money, he said, including the Pentagon’s proposal to make “modest increases” in coverage costs for military and Defense Department employees.

Panetta endorsed Gates’ approach to the $400 billion in budget cuts, saying that difficult choices must be made based on the impact on national security.

“I recognize the importance of balancing immediate and future needs,” Panetta said. “And in national security matters, such a balance is essential to keeping America safe both today and tomorrow.”

Panetta’s comments came in a Senate questionnaire prepared for Thursday’s hearing. The responses were obtained by The Associated Press.

Members of the Senate Armed Services Committee are close guardians of Pentagon spending, determined to avoid cuts that could undermine the services. Senators expressed concerns about deep reductions, especially after the significant growth in defense money over the past decade.

“I’ve seen a hollow army before,” said Sen. John McCain of Arizona, the top Republican on the Armed Services panel. “I don’t want to see that movie again.”

Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., said one question would be whether “we can count on him as secretary of defense to fight against cuts to the defense budget that would really put our national security at risk.”

If confirmed, Panetta’s first task will be overseeing the initial troop withdrawal from Afghanistan. Obama will decide on how many of the 100,000 U.S. troops he should withdraw beginning in July.

The Armed Services Committee’s chairman, Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., favors a reduction of 15,000, including combat troops, by year’s end. McCain wants a more modest cut and no combat troops.

In his Senate questionnaire, Panetta said he supports a “responsible” military withdrawal. He said that the United States has made enough progress in the Afghanistan war to give Obama meaningful options for the troop withdrawal but that the size and pace must depend on battlefield conditions.

On Libya, Panetta echoed many in the administration when he said Moammar Gadhafi’s reign has lost all legitimacy and he must go.

Copyright © 2011 The Associated Press

3 Responses to Wars, costs face new Pentagon chief

  1. Carl Nemo

    June 9, 2011 at 1:25 pm

    “Republican Sen. John McCain of Arizona says defense spending is not what is sinking the nation into fiscal crisis.” …extract from article

    This out of control spending for evermore uber spendy ‘killtoys’ surely doesn’t help the bottomline Senator McCain.

    Seemingly the ‘good’ Senator doesn’t realize it’s he and his 99 brethren that are the cause of our crisis by continually passing bum legislation regardless of the focus that damages this nation financially. The same goes for their lower body associates in the House too.

    Per Answers.com Congress passes nominally 1100 plus bills per annum, the majority of them having questionable merit. / : |

    Carl Nemo **==

  2. woody188

    June 9, 2011 at 10:55 pm

    How about cutting the contractor use instead of military pay? A lot of the cost increases over the last decade are paying these mercenaries triple what they pay enlisted men.

    • Carl Nemo

      June 10, 2011 at 9:48 pm

      Good point Woody. 39% of the workforce interfacing with the DOD are independent contractors as of 2009. During Rumsfeld’s tenure as SOD the number had grown to 20,000 both major and minor contractors with minimal to little oversight as to how taxpayer money was being squandered. It’s still going on in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and elsewhere. The waste and pilferage linked to corruption is mind boggling to say the least. An excellent web based film to watch is “Iraq for Sale” and is still possibly available for viewing. It will leave viewers heartsick as to how we’re being ripped off.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_defense_contractors

      The big problem is defense production and contracting represents one of our major ‘industries’ in a nation seemingly obsessed with waging endless zero sum wars against terrorists worldwide. It’s the parasitic MIC’s dream come true, but the end result is the destruction of the ‘host’ nation; I.E., the United States of America. We’re going down and down hard in the months and years to come due to this terminal love affair with things that are associated with the waging of unwinnable wars.

      Carl Nemo **==