Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone

Contractors get rich off U.S. wars

By
November 20, 2007

US contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan more than doubled from 2004 to 2006 to over 25 billion dollars but government oversight of the firms involved has slackened, a watchdog group said Monday.

“While the billions of dollars involved and the complexity of these war-related contracts has only grown, the lack of oversight has been staggering,” said Bill Buzenberg, head of the Center for Public Integrity.

The study by the independent center said government outsourcing for the two war theaters was marred by issues such as a lack of competitive bidding, missing contracts and unidentified companies.

The construction and services company KBR, formally known as Kellogg, Brown and Root and a subsidiary of oil-services giant Halliburton until April, topped the list with more than 16 billion dollars in US contracts from 2004 to 2006.

Halliburton was led from 1995 to 2000 by Vice President Dick Cheney, one of the most hawkish voices in the administration of President George W. Bush in the run-up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

DynCorp International, a provider of private security services to State Department personnel, was a distant second with 1.8 billion dollars in contracts.

Washington Group International, a rival to KBR in building and engineering, was third with just over one billion dollars.

Blackwater, whose security guards were accused of opening fire indiscriminately on Iraqi civilians in a deadly September incident in Baghdad, ranked 12th with 485 million dollars in contracts.

Just ahead of Blackwater was First Kuwaiti General Trading and Contracting, which has been accused of holding foreign laborers against their will to help build the new US embassy in Baghdad. The firm denies the charge.

Topping KBR’s haul, 20.4 billion dollars was awarded for services from “unidentified foreign entities” not identified in US government contracts.

The Center for Public Integrity, which says it is a non-partisan group that investigates major public issues, said it was seeking more information on those contracts through the Freedom of Information Act.

The group said that 31 of the contractors on the top 100 list were foreign, including 12 from Turkey.

Overall, US government contracts for work in Iraq and Afghanistan have grown from 11 billion dollars in 2004 to almost 17 billion in 2005 and more than 25 billion last year, the study said.

The center quoted US Comptroller General David Walker as saying, in an interview for the study, that there were particular problems with lack of oversight for military contracting.

“We have identified about 15 systemic, longstanding acquisition and contracting problems that exist within the Defense Department — which is the single biggest contractor within the US government — that we are still not making enough progress on,” he said.

One official inquiry by the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction found that the State Department was unable to say what it was receiving for much of the money given to DynCorp.

4 Responses to Contractors get rich off U.S. wars

  1. Caine

    November 20, 2007 at 10:24 am

    I’m shocked! SHOCKED I tell you! Who wouldda thunk it?

    Duh!

    It’s a cryin’ shame that we weren’t warned about this, what, in 1961 was it?

  2. Stratocaster

    November 20, 2007 at 4:24 pm

    Gee, I wonder why we don’t have money for health care, infastructure and social security.

  3. Stratocaster

    November 20, 2007 at 4:59 pm

    When our government is being financed with drug money, it is really hard to get anyone to do anything about corruption.

    http://www.serendipity.li/cia/hayes2.html

    http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/economy/dontblink.html

  4. Sandra Price

    November 20, 2007 at 5:10 pm

    I remember a time when it was unethical to make a profit on any war. Many new corporations were given defense contracts and the budget from D.C. was available for all to see how the money was allocated.

    In Vietnam this seems to have changed and I worked for a division of RAND in Santa Monica and saw the government purchase orders costing the tax payers outrageous costs of anything needed for our soldiers. I questioned the chief buyer of this stuff and he shrugged and told me we had to buy from the list that was sent from the Defense Department. It was so obvious that the charges for this equipment was 4 to 5 times higher than what we employees paid at our local stores.

    I remember one announcement that showed that toilet seats purchased on government contracts were 300 to 400 dollars each. It then became obvious why even the purchasing department had to be cleared for Secret classification and we were told not to say a word about anything we saw passing our desks.

    I was not pleased with the Vietnam war anyway and to see how the tax payers were scammed made me sick and I quit my job. Someone finally let the media in on this terrible cost of items and I remember being worried that they might have thought I did it because I was the only one in the department who was concerned.

    It was at this time that the government itself started manufactuing clothing for the women army corps. Bras cost the tax payers hundreds of dollars each and nobody gave a damn.

    American ethics are not above making fortunes from the tax payers when we are at war. I began writing to my Congressman at that time and never received an answer. These mercenary contractors are costing us three times what could be done through bids but these contracts are set for life in their greedy schemes.

    It is time for an overhaul of all this mess but we cannot do it during war times and nobody is interested during times of peace. We must not kid ourselves that when the Democrats are in office they too will hand out these contracts to their friends as that is how the system works.