Hillary’s lead starts to slip

Presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton’s lead is shrinking among Democratic contenders for the White House after a series of miscues and stepped-up attacks by her rivals.

Her air of invincibility took a hit this week amid reports that her staffers had planted audience questions, combined with fresh criticism by Democrats who accused her of shifting with the political winds during a presidential debate two weeks ago.

Although the former first lady still leads the pack of Democratic contenders for the White House, polls released Monday suggested that her campaign was losing steam.

Clinton had for months commanded a 30-point advantage over her closest competitor, Illinois Senator Barack Obama, but Monday saw that lead slip to 19 percent, according to the CNN/Opinion Research Corporation.

The poll, surveying 467 Democrats or independent voters likely to pick a Democrat for the White House, showed 44 percent would choose Clinton while 25 percent would vote for Obama.

The figures were in stark contrast to the same poll a month earlier which showed Clinton garnering 51 percent of likely voters and holding a 30-point lead over Obama.

Two other polls in the key state of New Hampshire, which traditionally holds the first presidential primary contest, showed similar results.

The CNN poll was taken just days after Clinton was attacked by her fellow White House hopefuls in a debate on October 31 as the Democratic race hit new levels of intensity.

During that debate, Obama branded her one of “co-authors” of the Iraq war and former senator John Edwards, the Democratic vice presidential nominee in 2004, accused her of political “doubletalk.”

Edwards blasted Clinton’s support for a Senate measure that labeled Iran’s Revolutionary Guard a terrorist group, which critics said may be used as a justification for war.

And Obama, who has fended off accusations from the Clinton camp that he is too inexperienced to lead, said Clinton’s vote in 2002 to authorize the administration’s invasion of Iraq made her a “co-author” of the war.

With the party’s first nominating contest in Iowa less than two months away, Clinton’s staff was forced to acknowledge planting audience questions on the campaign trail, and promised not to do it again.

The incident arose last week during a question-and-answer session in Iowa, at which a college student reportedly told her campus newspaper that she had been approached by “a Clinton aide had asked her to pose a question to Mrs. Clinton about global warming,” the New York Times said.

A spokesman for Clinton told the newspaper that a campaign aide had indeed planted the question but Clinton had not been aware of it, and said the campaign would not engage in such tactics again.

“It’s not something we do; it’s not an official campaign policy,” Mo Elleithee was quoted as saying. “But it is now an official campaign policy that we will not do this moving forward.”

“It was news to me,” was Clinton’s response. “Neither I nor my campaign approve of that, and it will certainly not be tolerated.”

Meanwhile, Clinton’s rivals kept up the steady stream of attacks, saying she was vague with voters on key issues, dodged hard questions and tailored her answers to different interest groups.

“I think that what Senator Clinton has been doing is running a textbook Washington campaign,” Obama said on Sunday.

“What that says is that you don’t answer directly tough questions, you don’t present tough choices directly to the American people, for fear that your answers might not be popular, you might make yourself a target for the Republicans in the general election.”

3 Responses to "Hillary’s lead starts to slip"

  1. Steve Horn  November 13, 2007 at 9:03 am

    Perhaps it’s not due to miscues or attacks – perhaps she’s slipping because the voters are doing a bit of research and are starting to see her for the opportunist and consumate politician (defined by me as one who can obscure the truth from their supporters) that she is.

    Could it be that they’re taking a lesson from the past seven years of Bush? That they want an honest, genuine person in the whitehouse rather than just a mouthpiece for special interests and big money supporters?

    Give the people of this nation a bit of credit –

    Peace

    Steve

  2. DejaVuAllOver  November 13, 2007 at 3:50 pm

    Well said, Steve, as usual. If Bush deserves credit for ANYTHING, it’s showing Americans just how despicable and degenerate politicians can be. Hillary is Queen of the Hill of HorseS*&t, and it’s beginning to stink around here.

  3. LurkingFromTheLeft  November 13, 2007 at 4:30 pm

    Beginning to stink?

    …you ain’t smelled nothin’ yet –

    LFTL

Comments are closed.