Privacy is under assault in America and the government is leading the charge.

Like personal liberties that disappeared under the despotic Presidency of George W. Bush, privacy is becoming an extinct species as the government seeks to monitor all financial transactions, travel and communications of Americans.

Now the Bush Administration wants to “redefine” privacy to fit its assault on the personal freedoms and civil liberties of American citizens.

By the time Bush is finished, the preamble to that historic document that once defined this nation will have to be changed to say that Americans are entitled to “a monitored life, a government-mandated notion of happiness and the terror of pursuit.”

Reports The Associated Press:

Privacy no longer can mean anonymity, says Donald Kerr, a deputy director of national intelligence. Instead, it should mean that government and businesses properly safeguards people’s private communications and financial information.

Kerr’s comments come as Congress is taking a second look at the Foreign Surveillance Intelligence Act.

Lawmakers hastily changed the 1978 law last summer to allow the government to eavesdrop inside the United States without court permission, so long as one end of the conversation was reasonably believed to be located outside the U.S.

The original law required a court order for any surveillance conducted on U.S. soil, to protect Americans’ privacy. The White House argued that the law was obstructing intelligence gathering.

The most contentious issue in the new legislation is whether to shield telecommunications companies from civil lawsuits for allegedly giving the government access to people’s private e-mails and phone calls without a court order between 2001 and 2007.

Some lawmakers, including members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, appear reluctant to grant immunity. Suits might be the only way to determine how far the government has burrowed into people’s privacy without court permission.

The committee is expected to decide this week whether its version of the bill will protect telecommunications companies.

The central witness in a California lawsuit against AT&T says the government is vacuuming up billions of e-mails and phone calls as they pass through an AT&T switching station in San Francisco.

Mark Klein, a retired AT&T technician, helped connect a device in 2003 that he says diverted and copied onto a government supercomputer every call, e-mail, and Internet site access on AT&T lines.


  1. We need a revolution. Guns, barricades, orphans, the whole bit. Instead of shrugging our shoulders and saying there’s no difference in parties, we should be working to make sure both parties become and remain honest.

    I never thought I’d live to see the day politicians would be so open about their perfidity, but when you have a public too apathetic to put down the remote and take back their country, it’s not so risky.

  2. The answer is not whether to vote or not or whether to hope for a decent, honest candidate to run for office….but to ‘do’ something.

    First, I think that becoming aware of what is going on around you is vital. The government’s doublespeak and re-defining words makes it so much easier for citizens to commit a crime (and not even know it). Make enough changes to the rules of law, make change again and again, and eventually everyone is guilty of something!

    Our loss of freedom is just another ‘re-definition’ away.

Comments are closed.