Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone

Obama gets the votes he needs for new arms treaty

By DONNA CASSATA
December 21, 2010

President Barack Obama locked up enough Senate Republican votes Tuesday to ratify a new arms control treaty with Russia that would cap nuclear warheads for both former Cold War foes and restart on-site weapons inspections.

Eleven Republicans joined Democrats in a 67-28 proxy vote to wind up the debate and hold a final tally on Wednesday. They broke ranks with the Senate’s top two Republicans and were poised to give Obama a win on his top foreign policy priority.

“We know when we’ve been beaten,” Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah told reporters hours before the vote.

Ratification requires two-thirds of those voting in the Senate and Democrats need at least nine Republicans to overcome the opposition of Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and Jon Kyl of Arizona, the party’s point man on the pact.

The Obama administration has made arms control negotiations the centerpiece of resetting its relationship with Russia, and the treaty was critical to any rapprochement.

Momentum for the accord accelerated earlier in the day Tuesday — the seventh day of debate — when Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, the No. 3 Republican in the Senate, announced his support.

The treaty will leave the United States “with enough nuclear warheads to blow any attacker to kingdom come,” Alexander said on the Senate floor, adding, “I’m convinced that Americans are safer and more secure with the New START treaty than without it.”

Four other Republican senators — Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Johnny Isakson of Georgia, Bob Corker of Tennessee and Robert Bennett of Utah — said they would back the pact.

“We are on the brink of writing the next chapter in the 40-year history of wrestling with the threat of nuclear weapons,” Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry, D-Mass., said after the vote.

Obama has insisted the treaty is a national security imperative that will improve cooperation with Russia, an argument loudly echoed by the nation’s military and foreign policy leaders, former Presidents George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton and six Republican secretaries of state.

In a fresh appeal for ratification, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Tuesday that the treaty would “strengthen our leadership role in stopping the proliferation of nuclear weapons, and provide the necessary flexibility to structure our strategic nuclear forces to best meet national security interests.”

Vice President Joe Biden and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton made a rare visit to the Capitol Tuesday to lobby lawmakers.

Conservative foes of the accord — among them possible GOP presidential candidates Mitt Romney, Sarah Palin, Newt Gingrich and Tim Pawlenty — argue the treaty would restrict U.S. options on a missile defense system to protect America and its allies and lacks sufficient procedures to verify Russia’s adherence.

“The administration did not negotiate a good treaty. They went into the negotiations it seems to me with the attitude with the Russians just like the guy who goes into the car dealership and says, ‘I’m not leaving here until I buy a car,'” Kyl said.

That opposition withered in the face of forceful statements from the military establishment, including Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen who said Monday that the treaty “enhances our ability to do that which we in the military have been charged to do: protect and defend the citizens of the United States.”

Obama, who postponed his holiday vacation, lobbied hard for the Senate to complete the treaty before January when Republicans increase their numbers by five and the accord’s outlook would be bleak.

Weeks after Republicans routed Democrats at the polls — seizing control of the House and strengthening their numbers in the Senate — Obama has prevailed in securing overwhelming bipartisan approval of a tax deal with Republicans and getting repeal of the 17-year-old ban on openly gay military members, a crucial issue with the party’s liberal base.

The White House had made steady progress in its efforts to persuade Republican lawmakers despite McConnell and Kyl’s opposition.

In announcing his support, Alexander said he was reassured by a letter from Obama, in which the president reiterated his commitment to modernizing the remaining nuclear arsenal with projected spending of $85 billion over 10 years. A significant amount of that money would go to nuclear facilities at Los Alamos, N.M., and Oak Ridge, Tenn., a critical issue with Alexander and Corker.

“My administration will pursue these programs and capabilities for as long as I am president,” Obama wrote in letters to Republican Sens. Alexander and Thad Cochran and Democrats Dianne Feinstein and Daniel Inouye.

Republicans and Democrats were discussing amendments to the accompanying resolution, not the treaty, that would deal with Republican problems with missile defense and build support for the agreement.

The treaty specifically would limit each country’s strategic nuclear warheads to 1,550, down from the current ceiling of 2,200. It also would establish a system for monitoring and verification. U.S. weapons inspections ended a year ago with the expiration of a 1991 treaty.

All 57 members of the Democratic caucus are expected to back the treaty; Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., underwent cancer surgery on Monday and is likely to miss the vote. Republicans who have previously announced they will vote for the treaty are Richard Lugar of Indiana, Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins of Maine, Scott Brown of Massachusetts and George Voinovich of Ohio.

“I think it’s going to pass and more than just pass,” Corker told reporters.

Announcing they would oppose the treaty were Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Utah’s Orrin Hatch, a Republican facing re-election in 2012 and a possible primary challenge from tea party-backed candidates.

Copyright © 2010 The Associated Press

Enhanced by Zemanta

4 Responses to Obama gets the votes he needs for new arms treaty

  1. Carl Nemo

    December 22, 2010 at 1:49 pm

    Noticing that Medvedev is right handed and Obama a ‘leftie’ I thought it would have been more appropriate that the two crossed arms with the ruskie signing off on ours and ‘dear leader’ signing off the ruskie version, both are “commies” to the core…no?

    Yep these two guys are really looking out for the citizens of planet earth…NOT! These treaties are all for public consumption, simply a smoke and mirrors excercise in futility. The nuclear “Doomsday Clock” is still three minutes or less to midnight. / : |

    Carl Nemo **==

    • Carl Nemo

      December 23, 2010 at 8:02 am

      Correction: the ‘n-clock’ is currently six minutes to midnight.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doomsday_Clock

      Nemo **==

    • logtroll

      December 23, 2010 at 8:57 am

      That’s what I like about you, Cap’n; you’re such an incurable romantic!

      (But you shouldn’t let yourself be caught looking at your watch during the tender moments.)

      • Carl Nemo

        December 23, 2010 at 9:11 am

        I measure even the referenced “tender moments” by the countdown mode on my watch. I’m a very busy guy and can’t waste time being overly sentimental. Our lives are in a countdown mode, so we should value every moment…no? : )

        Carl Nemo **==