Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone

The resurgence of Al Gore

By
October 13, 2007

An Oscar, an Emmy and the Nobel Peace Prize. Will Al Gore now seek the ultimate reward and Oval Office mantel space? Don’t count on it. Odds are that the former vice president won’t risk his Nobel-burnished image and huge public platform with a return to the rough-and-tumble world of presidential politics — at least not in 2008, advisers say.

“We face a true planetary emergency,” Gore said in a statement shortly after winning the prize on Friday. “The climate crisis is not a political issue.”

Actually, it is. Years after Gore adopted climate change as his signature issue, Democrats and Republicans alike now face the scientific certainty of global warming and a public that wants something done about it.

Nobody is better positioned than Gore to ride the issue to the White House.

Several Gore advisers, speaking on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to share his thinking, said the award will not make it any more likely that he will seek the presidency. If anything, it makes the presidential race less appealing to Gore, they said, because now he has an international platform and may not want to do anything to diminish it.

One adviser said that while Gore is unlikely to rule out a presidential bid in the coming days, the prospects of the former vice president entering the fray in 2008 are “extremely remote.”

“This clearly will help make this campaign he’s embarking on on climate change an even larger campaign, and he’ll have an even louder voice,” said Donna Brazile, his campaign manager in 2000. “But for now he’s citizen Al Gore, and I think he’s comfortable being citizen Al Gore.”

“Citizen Al” is 59, young enough to run for the presidency in 2012. For now, look for Gore to stick with his coy refrain: He has “no plans” to seek the presidency.

Plans, of course, can change.

“I’ve called Al Gore and urged him to run for president so many times,” former President Carter told NBC’s “Today” show. “He finally told me the last time, ‘President Carter, please do not call me.'”

Carter added, “I can at least do it indirectly through the news media.”

Also indirectly pressing Gore are scores of Internet-savvy supporters who are raising thousands of dollars for petition drives and advertising in an effort to lure him into the race. One group, Draftgore.com, ran a full-page open letter to Gore in Wednesday’s New York Times, imploring him to enter the race.

Associates of Gore say the upside of seeking the presidency is obvious to him:

• There is no better place to fight global warming than the Oval Office. The current occupant was slow to acknowledge mankind’s role in climate change; President Bush said through a spokesman Friday that he was happy for Gore.

• He has the money (Internet stocks made him rich after leaving the White House), the following and the name recognition to launch a serious campaign. “An Inconvenient Truth,” the global-warming documentary about his work, won an Oscar and an Emmy.

• He is not convinced that the current field is committed to the cause of global warming.

But he also knows that it’s late in the cycle and the race has taken shape without him, associates say, with polls showing Democratic voters are satisfied with the current crop of candidates. A losing or nasty political campaign could tarnish his carefully crafted image as a man above politics.

Finally, and perhaps most significantly, Gore never really had the stomach for tough political fights, which is one reason he didn’t make the best candidate in 2000.

Gore would not be welcomed by the Democratic candidates, especially front-running Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton — the former first lady who had a prickly relationship with him while they were in the White House. In the 1990s, the vice president and first lady vied for then-President Clinton’s political capital as they staked out their futures.

Asked by NBC this week if she expected to face Gore in the primary fight, Clinton said coolly, “You know, I think we’ve got great candidates running. We have a wonderful field.”

“Congratulations!” read the home page of Sen. Clinton’s campaign Web site Friday, featuring a picture of the former vice president. “His dedication and tireless work have been instrumental in raising international awareness about global warming.”

Next to Gore’s picture is a box that says, “Eight things you can do” to help Clinton become president.

___

Ron Fournier has covered politics for The Associated Press for nearly 20 years.

3 Responses to The resurgence of Al Gore

  1. Warren

    October 15, 2007 at 1:16 am

    Gore: Definition of Charlatan. One who pretends to know more than he does. Please see article in Sydney Morning Herald for a more realistic perspective from one of the fathers of modern meteorology.

  2. SEAL

    October 15, 2007 at 1:39 am

    That’s a real nice speach, Warren, but where are the facts to back it up?

  3. JoyfulC

    October 15, 2007 at 7:28 pm

    I’m sorry to say it — truly sorry — but I’m not a huge fan of Al Gore. I feel he embodies the true “liberal elitist” — the academic who accepts only that which supports his theory and ignores the rest.

    I continue to be disappointed that he didn’t defend the office of the presidency more enthusiastically when people were attacking President Clinton over something that was purely a personal and private matter. No one asked him to condone Clinton’s private choices. His role, as Vice President, was to defend the office of the President of the United States. I personally feel he failed miserably. He was the best tool of those who sought to overturn a democratically elected government. And for that reason, no matter how many issues I agree with him on and no matter if he writes a book a year, I’ll never feel I can trust him again.

    Gore is the typical egghead liberal elitist in that he doesn’t truly understand the American people. He seems to think that he can rise above and most Americans will get it — as if! He fails to understand that most Americans need things spelled out in black and white for them, and that if he fails to do this, there are plenty of those who will present a picture in black & white that the American public will swallow whole.

    I think Al Gore is a learned — if perhaps a bit sheltered — man. He’s a good activist for combatting global warming, but I don’t trust him to run the country. He’d be every much an idealogue as Bush is. Better someone like Clinton, who at least is clear-eyed about the political landscape. Or Fred Thompson who could at least calm things down on the homefront with his portrayal of a competent president.