His comments are giving Republicans a campaign-year cudgel and forcing Democrats to address a divisive issue within weeks of midterm contests that will decide the balance of power in Washington. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, in a competitive re-election fight, was the highest profile Democrat to move away from Obama on the matter.
“The First Amendment protects freedom of religion,” Reid’s spokesman Jim Manley said in a statement Monday. “Senator Reid respects that but thinks that the mosque should be built some place else.”
Democrats privately called the issue a distraction when the party should be laser-focused on keeping comfortable majorities in Congress. The political climate already favors Republicans as economically struggling voters look to unleash their fury on the party in power.
White House aides have spent four days trying to explain exactly where the normally eloquent president stands on the mosque. Obama’s ringing statement in support of religious equality Friday, followed a day later by a caveat, stoked anew false Internet rumors about his citizenship and religion.
Some Democratic candidates fear the political fallout that Republicans suggest is coming against those who support building a mosque two blocks from the lower Manhattan site of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. And some Republicans are trying to walk a careful line in their criticism, lest they be tagged religiously intolerant or be accused of stoking fear.
Former Sen. Dan Coats, who is challenging Rep. Brad Ellsworth for an Indiana Senate seat, said: “It’s an insult I think to the people who lost lives there.”
Former state Rep. Kevin Calvey, a Republican running for Congress in Oklahoma who served in Iraq, said ground zero is a “grossly inappropriate” place for a mosque. “I think it sends a message to terrorists that they’ve won, and I think that’s a mistake,” he said.
One of the few to praise the president was Republican-turned-independent Michael Bloomberg, the mayor of New York.
“If we shut down — shout down — a mosque and community center because it is two blocks away from the site where freedom was attacked, I think it would be a sad day for America,” Bloomberg told reporters Monday.
For weeks, the White House had refused to interject itself into what it called a local zoning issue even though the mosque debate had taken on national significance with Republicans such as Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich forcefully opposing it. Obama publicly commented on the issue only after Bloomberg delivered an impassioned supportive speech and after the plan cleared a final city regulatory hurdle.
It’s a tricky issue and not just because of the emotional nature of the attacks executed by terrorists from Muslim countries. Americans view Muslims far less favorably than other religious groups. Obama has set a welcoming tone even as the Christian president has been falsely accused by conservative critics of secretly being Muslim or foreign-born.
Obama waded into the debate Friday at the annual White House dinner celebrating the Islamic holy month of Ramadan, saying: “Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as everyone else in this country. And that includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in Lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances.”
By Saturday, the president was in Florida — and elaborating.
“I will not comment on the wisdom of making a decision to put a mosque there,” he said. “I was commenting very specifically on the right that people have that dates back to our founding.”
That doesn’t mean Obama was backing off his initial remarks, aides said. “The president didn’t do this because of the politics,” Obama spokesman Bill Burton said Monday. “He spoke about it because he feels he has an obligation as the president to address this.”
Regardless, politics was at full tilt.
Republicans, led by several considering challenging Obama in 2012, assailed the president.
“We all know that they have the right to do it, but should they?” Palin asked on Twitter. “This is not above your pay grade.”
More bluntly, Gingrich accused Obama of “pandering to radical Islam” and said: “Nazis don’t have the right to put up a sign next to the Holocaust Museum in Washington. We would never accept the Japanese putting up a sight next to Pearl Harbor. There’s no reason for us to accept a mosque next to the World Trade Center.”
Most Democrats stayed silent, probably because they’d rather discuss voters’ No. 1 issue — jobs. They’re already answering questions about a 9.5 percent unemployment rate, ethics charges against two veteran House lawmakers and Obama’s opposition to Arizona’s tough immigration law.
Including Reid, at least three Democrats broke from the White House — and party insiders expected more to follow suit, primarily moderates in conservative places. Several House Republican candidates issued statements demanding that their Democratic opponents say where they stand on the issue.
With the president visiting the state, Florida Democratic gubernatorial candidate Alex Sink said families and friends of 9/11 victims are opposed to the project “and I share their view.” A GOP opponent, Rick Scott, started running a TV ad that said: “Mr. President, ground zero is the wrong place for a mosque.”
In the Senate race, Democrat Jeff Greene said: “President Obama has this all wrong.” Conversely, Senate Democratic candidate Kendrick Meek backed the president. But he did so only after independent Senate candidate, Gov. Charlie Crist, said of Obama, “I think he’s right,” as marquee races in Florida quickly turned from local jobs to a New York mosque in the time it took Obama to explain where he stood.
Liz Sidoti has covered national politics for The Associated Press since 2003.
Copyright © 2010 The Associated Press
- GOP seizes on mosque as election issue (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
- Senate Leader Reid Opposes Plan for Mosque Near ‘Ground Zero’ (businessweek.com)
- Obama attacked for mosque defence (bbc.co.uk)