Hillary’s pesky ‘Bill’ problem

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton is running for president on her husband’s White House record, and it’s a strategy that cuts both ways.

The New York senator and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, constantly remind voters of the nation’s economic prosperity in the 1990s and his record on the environment, college aid and family medial leave. Press releases from the campaign often include sentences that start , “Under the Clinton administration …”

“Yesterday’s news was pretty good,” Bill Clinton said last month in Iowa while campaigning with his wife.

But yesterdays’ news isn’t always easy to explain today.

A San Francisco blogger made that painfully clear to Sen. Clinton during the Yearly Kos Convention, when he asked whether she would support or repeal four major pieces of legislation enacted during the Clinton administration — the Defense of Marriage Act, the Telecommunications Act, the North American Free Trade Agreement and welfare reform.

All four laws are unpopular with liberal voters who historically dominate Democratic primaries and caucuses. The political landscape for Democrats has changed since the 1990s on issues such as gay rights, trade and welfare reform — due in part to the rise of the influential and polarizing liberal blogosphere. That means candidates like Clinton must shift, too, or defend their refusal to do so.

The San Francisco man had put Clinton on the spot.

So she hedged and dodged in a complicated set of answers to explain herself.

The Defense of Marriage Act, which denied federal recognition of same-sex marriages and gave states the right to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages, “served a very important purpose,” she told the blogger. The law staved off Republican efforts to amend the U.S. Constitution to ban gay marriage, Clinton said, an argument that seems to consign her husband’s support of the law to the “necessary evil” category.

It also assumes the voters will buy the assumption that Republicans had the political might to change the Constitution, a Herculean task.

Clinton said she would favor repeal of a provision of the act that theoretically could endanger the federal benefits of gay couples.

The Telecommunications Act is unpopular with Democratic bloggers and other liberals who believe the law has led to rampant media consolidation. The topic received widespread discussion at the Kos convention, which wrapped up Sunday, in light of Ruppert Murdoch’s purchase of The Wall Street Journal.

Murdoch’s massive global media and entertainment empire includes Fox broadcast network, which is vilified by liberal bloggers.

Clinton dodged the issue

“You’d have to ask Al Gore,” she told the blogger, referring to the former vice president who spearheaded the Clinton administration’s telecommunications policies. “Al was very involved in designing and pushing that through.”

It wasn’t lost on Clinton’s crowd that Gore has not ruled out a presidential run in 2008. She had just passed he buck to a potential rival.

It is rare to hear Clinton, one of the field’s most polished candidates, admit ignorance on a policy issue. But doing so came in handy as she fobbed off the question on Gore.

“He’s an expert,” she said. “I’m not.”

The North American Free Trade Agreement lowered economic barriers between the United States, Canada and Mexico, but many voters believe it has cost the nation more jobs than it has produced. It’s a constant source of tension for Clinton on the campaign trail.

While she won’t commit to repealing NAFTA as some other Democrats do, Clinton puts some distance between herself and her husband by saying one of the cornerstone’s of his presidency “did not realize the benefits it … promised.”

His decision to sign the 1996 welfare reform law angered many of his advisers, including some from his wife’s political circle. But he felt enormous political pressure to sign the Republican-backed legislation or be branded a liberal in the run-up to his re-election campaign.

Sen. Clinton did not disavow the welfare legislation, but she didn’t exactly embrace it, either.

“The positives,” she told the blogger, “far outweigh the negatives.”

She hopes the same can be said about the strategy to run on her husband’s record.

___

Ron Fournier has covered politics for The Associated Press for nearly 20 years.

2 Responses to "Hillary’s pesky ‘Bill’ problem"

  1. Carl Nemo  August 6, 2007 at 9:38 am

    If “Billary” is smart she’d bag her presidential campaign ambitions and be content to become a “fixture” as a Senator… :)) Then she could say goodbye to “Billy” and live some type of sane existence. She’ll have far more influence on national legislation as a Senator for “life” as opposed to having a failed attempt for the presidency.

    She isn’t going to fly with the American electorate. She’s as sorely deluded as Edwards, Giulani, Romney, and a host of other wannabes on both sides of the aisle. My gut instincts tell me that Barack Obama will be the next president of the United States, but if he ties up with “Billary” as V.P. or vice versa than you can forget them both! Obama conducts himself in an articulate, no nonsense manner. He’s tall, has vocal presence with a basso voice and doesn’t seem like a phony as the rest. What comes out of his mouth seems balanced and reasonable. His only hazard is who he might choose as a running mate, and he best choose wisely (Hillary “not”) otherwise he’ll go down bigtime. Otherwise America will elect another republican; ie., “A Nightmare on Elm Street”… :((

    Carl Nemo **==

  2. Jeffrey B.  August 6, 2007 at 7:14 pm

    The Peckerdilloes of Willy J.

    As a broadcaster on the alternative networks for the past dozen years, I can truthfully say that during the Clinton years – a sense of humor was extended to our audience. At least with ‘Bubba Jeff’ there WERE a few good laughs.

    One must consider that we try to teach our children ‘abstinence’ when it comes to sexual relations. Under the current administration, anal sex is the norm as we have all taken it in the ass-ets. At least under the guidance of Clinton – oral relations were the norm – and we all know that “BJs” aren’t sex! Everyone is satisfied and no one gets hurt – that’s my idea of government.

    Leave Hillary alone. I don’t like her, but I for one am looking forward to The Peckerdilloes of Willy J. – The Adventure Continues.

Comments are closed.