Bank bill passes but work remains

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, Senator Chris Dodd and other Democrats celebrate passage of financial reform bill (AP)

In the end, it’s only a beginning.

The far-reaching new banking and consumer protection bill awaiting President Barack Obama’s signature now shifts from the politicians to the technocrats.

The legislation gives regulators latitude and time to come up with new rules, requires scores of studies and, in some instances, depends on international agreements falling into place.

For Wall Street, the next phase represents continuing uncertainty. It also offers banks and other financial institutions yet another opportunity to influence and shape the rules that govern their businesses.

In hailing the bill’s passage in the Senate on Thursday, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner acknowledged that implementing the new law will take time.

“But we are determined to move as quickly as we can to provide clarity and certainty,” he said.

Among the first impacts of the bill, which Obama is expected to sign as early as Wednesday, will be the immediate creation of a 10-member Financial Stability Oversight Council, a powerful assembly of regulators chaired by the treasury secretary to keep watch over the entire financial system.

The Obama administration has one year to create a new Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. Congress will keep its eye on that agency, eager to see whom Obama chooses as its director. The agency will have vast powers to enforce regulations covering mortgages, credit cards and other financial products.

One of the candidates often mentioned for the top consumer spot is Elizabeth Warren, a Harvard Law School professor who was among the first to suggest the creation of an agency to safeguard consumers in their financial transactions. Warren heads the Congressional Oversight Panel, which has been a watchdog over the Treasury Department’s bank bailout fund. Others mentioned include Michael Barr, an assistant treasury secretary who has been one of the architects of the administration’s regulatory plan.

But while the oversight council and the consumer bureau might bloom swiftly, other central provisions of the bill will take time, in some cases years, to take root.

The consumer bureau, for instance, has as long as 30 months after it is created for its regulations on predatory lending to take effect. The legislation calls for a two-year study before regulators write rules on how risk-rating agencies should avoid any conflict of interest with the firms whose financial products they assess.

The Fed has until April to derive standards to measure the fairness of fees charged by banks to merchants for customers who use debit cards. And regulators will have to fine tune the broad restrictions in the legislation for the complex derivatives market. Key will be determining what firms and corporations will face new restrictions.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce counts more than 350 rules that the legislation directs regulators to write. Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd, an author of the bill, says the legislation gives regulators a specific blueprint to follow.

“This bill directs the regulators to do things,” he said in an interview. “We leave to the regulators how best to achieve the goals, but the goals are clear. Congress is not a regulator.”

In many instances, regulators already have embarked on rule-writing. The SEC, for instance, has been working on rules that would impose the same professional standards on stockbrokers and dealers that are imposed on financial advisers. The legislation insists that the SEC conduct a study first.

Hailing the bill Thursday, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke said the central bank is also ahead of the game, “overhauling its supervision and regulation of banking organizations.”

Regulators also will have to figure out how to implement new standards for how much capital banks should hold in reserve to protect against losses. The legislation requires rules in 18 months. But the U.S. is also part of international negotiations on what global capital standards should be, and those could move more slowly.

“I am very confident with the strong hand that this (legislation) gives us, that we will be able to bring the world with us,” Geithner told reporters Thursday.

___

AP Economics Writer Martin Crutsinger contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2010 The Associated Press

Enhanced by Zemanta

5 Responses to "Bank bill passes but work remains"

  1. griff  July 16, 2010 at 9:06 pm

    “The legislation gives regulators latitude and time to come up with new rules, requires scores of studies and, in some instances, depends on international agreements falling into place.”

    Why are we dependent upon international agreements falling into place?

    Looks like this will be a boon for busy-body bureaucrats and a way for the regulated to write their own regulations. Yeah, that should work out just dandy, like it did with Gramm-Leach-Blilely.

    • woody188  July 17, 2010 at 1:10 am

      It’s sounds like Congress isn’t going to be a check on the Executive anymore since Treasury and this new board will fall under the Executive and has the power to write the law (regulations) and enforce them. This gives the Executive power over the entire economy. Congress basically is capitulating to the Unitary Executive. We really do live in tyranny.

  2. woody188  July 17, 2010 at 2:07 am

    “We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors (FELLOW NWO TRAITORS) have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years… It would have been IMPOSSIBLE FOR US to develop OUR PLAN FOR THE WORLD if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the World is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards A WORLD GOVERNMENT. The SUPRA-NATIONAL sovereignty of an INTELLECTUAL ELITE and WORLD BANKERS is surely preferable to the ‘National Auto-Determination’ (FREEDOM) practiced in past centuries.”

    - David Rockefeller; Bilderberg Meeting, June 1991 – Baden, Germany

    • jim0001  July 17, 2010 at 12:18 pm

      Look out “New World Order” and “One World Government”….”Slowly I turn, step by:. step, inch by inch”.

    • griff  July 18, 2010 at 10:28 am

      Couldn’ta done it widoucha!

Comments are closed.