Bush calls CIA leak story ‘old news’

President Bush always said he would wait to talk about the CIA leak case until after the investigation into his administration’s role. On Thursday, he skipped over that step and pronounced the matter old news hardly worth discussing.

“It’s run its course,” he said. “Now we’re going to move on.”

Despite a long history of denouncing leaks, Bush declined to express any disappointment in the people who worked for him and who were involved in disclosing the name of a CIA operative. Asked about that during a wide-ranging news conference, the president gave a dodgy answer.

“It’s been a tough issue for a lot of people in the White House,” he said.

He didn’t even acknowledge the undisputed fact that someone working for him was the source, saying only that “perhaps somebody in the administration did disclose the name of that person.”

The investigation was launched to determine who leaked the identity of Valerie Plame, a former CIA operations officer who had served overseas and is married to a key administration critic on the war, Joseph Wilson.

Shortly before Plame’s cover was blown in 2003, Wilson had accused the Bush administration of manipulating intelligence to exaggerate the threat from Iraqi weapons and thus help justify the war.

Wilson has said he believes his wife’s identity was disclosed to punish him and to undermine his credibility.

After a two-year probe, Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald indicted Vice President Dick Cheney’s chief of staff, I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, on charges of obstruction of justice and of lying to investigators and the grand jury about the leak. He was convicted in March on all but one count. Ten days ago, Bush commuted Libby’s 30-month prison sentence, while leaving other penalties in place.

Libby is still appealing his conviction. And Bush has not ruled out an eventual pardon for the former top White House aide.

But the president appeared eager Thursday to put the entire case in the past. It was costly for his presidency, denting his image as someone who had pledged to restore integrity to the White House.

As it turned out, several administration officials revealed Plame’s identity. White House political adviser Karl Rove and Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage were the primary sources for a 2003 newspaper column outing Plame. Former White House press secretary Ari Fleischer also admitted telling reporters about her. Libby was the only one charged in the matter and not for leaking.

“I’ve often thought about what would have happened had that person come forth and said, `I did it,'” Bush said, despite the fact that Armitage and perhaps the others did just that.

In the beginning stages of the case, Bush said, “I want to know the truth,” and pledged to fire anyone found to have leaked. As the investigation wore on, he expressed more weariness than outrage, saying only that someone who “committed a crime” would be fired and calling the case “background noise” he had to ignore.

The question on the CIA leak case was only one of three during the 59-minute news conference that did not deal with Iraq.

The others addressed a new threat assessment from U.S. counterterrorism analysts. It says al-Qaida has used its safe haven along the Afghan-Pakistan border to restore operating capabilities to a level unseen since the months before Sept. 11, 2001.

Nevertheless, Bush said, “Because of the actions we’ve taken, al-Qaida is weaker today than they would have been.”

The president also was asked whether it was appropriate for Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff to say he had a “gut feeling” there might be a terror attack this summer. “My gut tells me that which my head tells as well, is that: When we find a credible threat, we’ll share it with you,” Bush said.

The president’s main purpose for holding the news conference was to present his take on a new report sent to lawmakers on the progress made by the Iraqi government. The interim assessment, required by Congress, shows only mixed results so far, with Iraqis making satisfactory progress on eight benchmarks, mostly in security areas, but unsatisfactory progress on another eight and mixed results on two.

With both chambers of Congress debating legislation to order the withdrawal of U.S. troops by next spring, Bush asked for more time to let his troop-increase plan work. “I believe we are making security progress that will enable the political track to succeed,” he said.

The president also sought to make some common cause with his opponents. Bush portrayed the growing number of Republicans who are urging him to change course as agreeing with him.

And he left the strong impression he is leaning toward reducing troop levels, though without offering any specific time frames or promises. He referenced “when” — not “if” — “we start drawing down” and said he would “judge where we need to make any adjustments” after a follow-up report in September. He even noted that, at that point, he will make sure “that al-Qaida and other extremists do not benefit from a decision I might have to make.”

At the same time, Bush made clear that while he’ll listen to lawmakers, they have little business making war decisions. He said Congress “has got all the right to appropriate money” but not to set troop strength or tell the military how to conduct operations.

“I don’t think Congress ought to be running the war,” he said. “I think they ought to be funding our troops.”

11 Responses to "Bush calls CIA leak story ‘old news’"

  1. geyser  July 14, 2007 at 7:22 pm

    This is not new for bush. Any of the scandals are looked to be buried as fast and as deep as possible. If it lingers too long, Republican voters might remember at the voting booth. You notice he called it an “OLD” story, planting the word OLD in Republican heads.
    He is in for a shock, this old story will be hanging around, the Democrats will see to that. Lying to a Grand Jury will become a very bad thing to do. Not being punished for it will be even worse.
    Not to get too far off the subject, Doug should have a contest, the person who can guess correctly the number of Books that come out about Bush, six months after he leaves office.

    Taking it one Day at a Time

  2. mojibyrd  July 15, 2007 at 11:44 am

    Well, well, well should we..

    Of course Bush feels we should move on, as with this administration with each passing day their is a new story to tell about corruption, sex, lies, war for oil, b.s. terrorism, embezzlement and a host of other issues…hell this administration has made reading fiction tame compared to the ‘truth’ as it comes out about all the corruption…so yes Mr. Bush we shall move on, cause you will give us something else to talk about, but guess what we shall not forget just move on till the noose is tight enough (which by the way if we really had a congress/senate for the people instead of the lobbyists, would have impeached your ass by now).

    Impeach Bush and take Cheney too.

  3. Bill Jonke  July 12, 2007 at 11:58 pm

    Come now, does he really believe that we’ll dismiss that whole idea and move on?

    If we “move on,” things will get horribly worse.

  4. LurkingFromTheLeft  July 13, 2007 at 12:15 am

    I’m with you!

    …I was SO entertained on my commute home Thursday –

    …listening to NPR’s recap of the interview of the empty chair –

    …and the R twits saying it was unparlimentary –

    …shit – we don’t have parliment here – unless of course that is his brand of cig –

    …we’d be better off if we DID have a parliment – we could call an election to send these shit heads home –

    …thank dog for wine – it ain’t ativan – or those other pharmaceuticals but it surely tastes BONNE!

    LFTL

  5. Carl Nemo  July 13, 2007 at 12:23 am

    To Bush, anything older than a minute ago is “old news”… :)) Are there any questions folks?! This guy is a dangerous “jerk”…! If the House and Senate keep playing around with this “challenged one” they’l all be playing the harmonica in Camp Halliburton and sticking their bare asses through the barbed wire to service the camp guards for some chewing gum, cigarettes, and maybe some SPAM, and not the data type either…:))

    Carl Nemo**==

  6. www.nazilieskill.us  July 13, 2007 at 11:07 am

    Crooks think they are superior to those they con.

    John Hanks, Laramie, Wyoming

  7. Bill Jonke  July 13, 2007 at 11:25 am

    Your description more than adequately describes Bush. This mindset has been the major force during his tenure of office. If he thinks he can get away with it yet again, Bellevue should be knockin’ at his door soon.

  8. bryan mcclellan  July 13, 2007 at 12:58 pm

    This mindless boob identifies the real threat to this nation every time he babbles in front of the world that treason is old news.The seditious and treasonous W.H. is the foremost threat to democracy that exists to date on this good earth.I would rather wipe my ass with fiberglass than listen to this nut step all over his brain.Sorry to give him credit for having whats left of a coked out psyche. What a shameful and embarrassing indictment of our educational system he is. Look in the mirror chimp and you will see a boil on the worlds ass that needs lancing. Is there a Doctor in the house?

  9. Steve Horn  July 13, 2007 at 1:43 pm

    I recall when this story first broke Bush pledged, if someone in his administration was found to be responsible for the leak, to take care of them. At the time I assumed (along with, in all likely hood the majority of citizens) that meant to cooperate and ensure that the appropriate legal action was taken and penalties (if any) applied.

    Once again, it would appear that his (ass)holiness, the nearly self proclaimed king of America has forgotten a promise made.

    More and more when I read about, hear about or think about this administration I feel like the lead character in Sartre’s novel “Nausea” on Antoine Roquentin … read the novel … you’ll understand.

    heh .. perhaps I can profit by publishing the “Bush Admnistration Weight Loss Plan” (eat a meal, read the news, vomit, repeat until slender)

    Peace

    Steve

  10. Bill Jonke  July 13, 2007 at 2:26 pm

    We could call it “The Bushimic Diet Plan.”

  11. JudyB  July 13, 2007 at 1:55 pm

    Bush pronounced the CIA leak as “old news hardly worth
    discussing.” I have a “gut feeling”, that “The Decider” discusses aboslutely nothing! He’ll tell us what he wants us to know, what we think and how we feel about any and all decisions he makes. If he says its old news, then it must be old news!
    Anytime der furor Bush or one of his gestapho decide tell us anything, we know by now that it’s not going to be the truth, and NEVER NEVER NEVER is it going on any official record as the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help me God.

Comments are closed.