Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone

Even government workers face job losses

By CHRISTOPHER LEONARD and CHRISTOPHER S. RUGABER
July 5, 2010

Daryl Seaman in Edwardsville, Illinois. No longer secure (AP)

For years, most people who worked for state or local governments accepted a fact of life: Their pay wasn’t great. The job security was.

Now that’s gone, too.

States and municipalities are facing gaping budget gaps. Many have responded by slashing services, raising taxes and, for the first time in decades, making deep job cuts.

And public employees should brace themselves: Some economists say the job cuts could worsen in the second half of the year.

Those government layoffs make it harder to reduce the national unemployment rate, now 9.5 percent. The rate did fall slightly in June because more than a half-million out-of-work Americans gave up their job searches. Once people stop seeking work, they’re no longer counted as unemployed.

The economy is already under pressure from weak consumer spending, sinking stock prices, a European debt crisis and a teetering real estate market.

“It’s certainly a drag on economic growth in our outlook,” Mark Vitner, an economist at Wells Fargo, said of the loss of public-sector jobs.

It’s also a burden for residents. As state and municipal employees are cut, so are services. It takes longer to register a car, see a school nurse or travel to work by bus.

In California, state-run Department of Motor Vehicle offices have been closed on selected furlough Fridays to cut costs.

In New York City, a new budget will close up to 30 senior centers, shutter a 24-hour homeless center in Manhattan and eliminate nurses at schools with fewer than 300 students.

In Atlanta, the metro transit agency shut 40 bus lines and closed restrooms in June. Even so, 300 employees might lose their jobs to close a $69 million budget gap.

Julie Bussgang used to have assistants to help her keep order in her kindergarten classroom in Albany, Calif. Last year, those assistants were cut. Bussgang was left on her own.

“I’ve had kids calling for help from the bathroom, and I was alone with 24 kids,” she says. “We got through far less of the curriculum than we did in the previous year. Everything took longer.”

State and local governments cut 95,000 jobs in the first half of the year even as the economy slowly recovered. Private employers, by contrast, added 593,000 jobs in that time. It’s the first time the public sector has cut jobs while the private sector has added jobs since 1981, said Marisa Di Natale, a director at Moody’s Economy.com.

In the second half of the year, 152,000 more local and state government employees will be laid off, estimates Nigel Gault, an economist at IHS Global Insight.

Counting companies that work with state governments, a total of 900,000 jobs could be lost to states’ budget shortfalls, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a think tank in Washington.

From teachers and probation officers to recreation workers and transportation specialists, public employees who never imagined their jobs could be in jeopardy are discovering they are.

They are people like 24-year-old Brianna Clegg, who had never hesitated to take on school loans in pursuit of her teaching certificate.

“I was always hearing, ‘There’s a huge need for teachers.'”

Yet as California’s budget crisis mounted last year, thousands of teaching jobs were slashed. One was Clegg’s job teaching fourth grade in Stockton, Calif.

When she sought another position, she made a grim discovery: In a state in which roughly 26,000 teachers have been laid off, openings existed for 39 teachers. Clegg wasn’t among the fortunate few.

Across the country, the trouble stems from shrinking state income and sales tax revenue, a consequence of the recession. Total state revenue dropped 11 percent from fiscal year 2008, when the recession began, to fiscal 2010, according to the National Association of State Budget Officers.

Compounding the problem, Democrats in Congress have failed to come up with the votes to spend about $50 billion to help states pay for Medicaid programs and avoid teacher layoffs. Governors made a plea for the money to help them avoid layoffs. Kansas Gov. Mark Parkinson said his state might have to lay off 3,600 teachers.

Senate Republicans have argued that the nation can’t afford further spending in light of record-high budget deficits.

Until recently, state governments had been able to paper over some of their funding shortfalls with money from last year’s $787 billion federal stimulus package. Now that’s drying up. As a new fiscal year begins this month in most states, they’re struggling to balance their budgets, as required by every state but Vermont.

So they’re cutting services and laying off employees.

“We do expect more layoffs to come,” Vitner said. “State and local governments are having to make the cuts they didn’t have to make a year ago.”

Hardest hit have been states – like California, Arizona and Nevada – whose housing markets had overheated and then deflated, said Brian Sigritz of the National Association of State Budget Officers. But budget crises have spread nearly everywhere. About 46 states face total budget gaps of at least $112 billion this year, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities says.

At least 26 states have cut jobs this year to try to close budget deficits. Five others have imposed temporary layoffs. Their tight budgets have led many states to shift more spending burdens to localities, adding to budget problems in many cities.

For every worker who’s been laid off, many others worry that they’re next. The sense of long-term security that once attached itself to a state or local government job is gone.

One of them is Daryl Seaman, who was so confident in his job security just a year ago that he built a new home for his family. As a probation officer for Madison County, Ill., he didn’t think his job would ever be in jeopardy.

Twelve months later, Seaman has been demoted because of county budget cuts. He finds himself obsessing with co-workers over the next round of layoffs that could claim their jobs.

“Everybody is panicking,” Seaman says.

Seaman’s wife teaches in a district that has laid off some teachers with less seniority. With two teenage daughters to support, they’re saving everything they can.

“We’re just afraid to spend any money,” Seaman says.

___

Rugaber reported from Washington, Leonard from St. Louis.

Enhanced by Zemanta

5 Responses to Even government workers face job losses

  1. griff

    July 5, 2010 at 12:57 pm

    Yep. America’s shutting down, folks. So much for Hope. Brother can you spare some Change?

  2. woody188

    July 5, 2010 at 2:03 pm

    Told those teachers and union government employees their time was coming in 4 years or so. Their recession always follows the real economy by about that amount. They are likely to lose their pensions to boot as most are under funded by many millions. The downward spiral is picking up pace.

  3. Bogofree

    July 5, 2010 at 4:40 pm

    I had read that public employees (I will not use the term worker) receive 39% more in pay and benefits than those in the DPS (Dreaded Private Sector).

    Here is the real issue and it is personal. I have 30 years of qualified earnings under Social Security and when I left the DPS I went into teaching and retired after 14 years of service. This leaves me well short of my potential max on teaching but still that pension is greater than my SS for 30 years.

    Stimulus money going into government payrolls. Temporary solution and a political payback.

  4. ra

    July 5, 2010 at 10:40 pm

    Wait ’til Republicans control things again and they want to fight another war (Iran?). The purse strings will pull wide open, without so much as a whimper. Their real problem with today’s deficit is the social related spending included in it. They just don’t want to spend in that area, and don’t like not being the ones who have the say.

  5. paulb6

    July 11, 2010 at 6:58 am

    The government was intended to be “the employer of last resort” however with that being said they comprise 25% of the entire population in employees. How would anyone not expect a recession with this upside down employment ratio. We are as bad as Greece and will most likely suffer the same fate.