Comments on: Tea Party fruitcakes: This is change?

By: Almandine

Almandine — Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:46:23 +0000

Much the same could be said about the empirical linkage between abortion and breast cancer. Many epidemiological studies have been conducted that show significantly increased risk of breast cancer associated with abortion, and while correlative data do not, because of their statistical standing, provide definitive “causal” status, they have traditionally been deemed authoritative in epidemiology. The problem with attribution, of course, is the multi-factorial nature of disease… genetic, behavioral, environmental, etc., factors; however, to deny such an extensive data linkage is tantamount to saying that smoking cigarettes does not “cause” lung cancer.

Bottom line… Angle is on pretty solid footing regarding this one:

http://www.lifenews.com/nat5850.html

By: griff

griff — Mon, 14 Jun 2010 00:29:26 +0000

Are you implying that the ACLU stands for that? Not always.

As for the Constitution? All of it.

By: Ray

Ray — Sun, 13 Jun 2010 19:18:14 +0000

“to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to every person in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States.”

gee so which part of the Constitution do you not support?

By: griff

griff — Sat, 12 Jun 2010 01:59:41 +0000

In other news, Mr. anti-executive-order has just issued his 58th in less than 18 months This one establishes a National Prevention, Health Promotion, and Public Health Council. Sounds so loving.

By: hologram5

hologram5 — Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:29:27 +0000

Agreed, we wonder why our children are developing younger and younger, we wonder why conditions like autism and down’s syndrom are getting more and more prevalent in today’s society. We wonder why upwards 25% of americans are on anti-depressants. We are killing ourselves with the garbage we eat/drink and put in our bodies.

By: hologram5

hologram5 — Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:26:06 +0000

The whole thing about the flouride helping your teeth and them putting it in the water is a farce. Your stomach does not use the flouride, it has to stay on your teeth for an hour or so. Digested flouride does not go to your teeth, it does nothing for your bones. It is an old wives tale that this works and it’s high time they quit lying to themselves and us in this matter.

By: griff

griff — Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:06:18 +0000

Here's a fine piece along those lines. Excerpt: "This, then, was the ultimate reason for the breakup of the libertarian-conservative alliance accomplished with the John Randolph Club: that while the libertarians were willing to learn their cultural lesson the conservatives did not want to learn their economics."

By: griff

griff — Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:26:14 +0000

I’ve never been a big fan of the ACLU generally, but they do some good sometimes. Support is on a case-by-case basis.

By: griff

griff — Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:50:04 +0000

Yeah I use their deodorant as well – great stuff.

I wonder what role a lifetime of ingesting toxic waste such as sodium fluoride has in the explosion of chronic illness we see today, particularly later in life. Not to mention, of course, the thousands of other chemicals and dyes we gladly scarf down every day.

By: woody188

woody188 — Fri, 11 Jun 2010 02:43:22 +0000

I’ve been told the ACLU is nothing without Soro’s money. Can’t stay in the fight long enough anymore to get anything done. They were used to promote an anti-family/global agenda and are now discarded like an old Kleenex.