<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama tries anger in latest attempt to salvage Presidency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/27281/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/27281</link>
	<description>The oldest political news site on the Internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 02:13:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Almandine</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/27281/comment-page-1#comment-65359</link>
		<dc:creator>Almandine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 01:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=27281#comment-65359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good thoughts... emotion substituting for competence. Is that not most of the problem with the big O?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thoughts&#8230; emotion substituting for competence. Is that not most of the problem with the big O?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: griff</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/27281/comment-page-1#comment-65326</link>
		<dc:creator>griff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 15:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=27281#comment-65326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent thoughts on the subject, although I don&#039;t see where any laws were broken. But hey, since Washington is always giving retroactive immunity to corporations for crimes committed, why not pass a law that makes this kind of drilling illegal and then retroactively prosecute the offenders? What&#039;s good for the goose...

The Environmental Lobby makes it nearly impossible to explore domestically, forcing Big Oil to lobby for more lax restrictions and more leeway in offshore drilling.

The end result is what we have today. Big Energy makes its money in the artificial scarcity and increased costs of more radical and environmentally hazardous operations. The environmentalists will gain more power in steering energy policy and government-funded (read: taxpayer-funded) alternative and green energy schemes (which is a good overall endeavor, but at this point solar and wind energy are insufficient replacements for oil and coal for mass energy production, and should be funded by the private sector).

And of course, the politicians benefit from all the lobbyist attention and the grandiose perception of their own importance and worth.

A side story. I have a friend that does logistics for a company that designs and builds trenching machines for powerline construction as well as powerline construction itself. Most of their work nationwide was large-scale wind farms.

During the Bush years his company was working all over the United States and had a healthy and growing work force. It was reasonably assumed that once a &quot;green-friendly&quot; president and congress had won the election their work would only increase.

Since last year they&#039;ve laid off half of their well-paid work force and are struggling to remain afloat. Even domestic alternative energy development has ground to a halt due to the massive bureaucracy and endless wait for government assistance and approval for what should be the realm of private enterprise and good old American capital investment and risk-taking.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent thoughts on the subject, although I don&#8217;t see where any laws were broken. But hey, since Washington is always giving retroactive immunity to corporations for crimes committed, why not pass a law that makes this kind of drilling illegal and then retroactively prosecute the offenders? What&#8217;s good for the goose&#8230;</p>
<p>The Environmental Lobby makes it nearly impossible to explore domestically, forcing Big Oil to lobby for more lax restrictions and more leeway in offshore drilling.</p>
<p>The end result is what we have today. Big Energy makes its money in the artificial scarcity and increased costs of more radical and environmentally hazardous operations. The environmentalists will gain more power in steering energy policy and government-funded (read: taxpayer-funded) alternative and green energy schemes (which is a good overall endeavor, but at this point solar and wind energy are insufficient replacements for oil and coal for mass energy production, and should be funded by the private sector).</p>
<p>And of course, the politicians benefit from all the lobbyist attention and the grandiose perception of their own importance and worth.</p>
<p>A side story. I have a friend that does logistics for a company that designs and builds trenching machines for powerline construction as well as powerline construction itself. Most of their work nationwide was large-scale wind farms.</p>
<p>During the Bush years his company was working all over the United States and had a healthy and growing work force. It was reasonably assumed that once a &#8220;green-friendly&#8221; president and congress had won the election their work would only increase.</p>
<p>Since last year they&#8217;ve laid off half of their well-paid work force and are struggling to remain afloat. Even domestic alternative energy development has ground to a halt due to the massive bureaucracy and endless wait for government assistance and approval for what should be the realm of private enterprise and good old American capital investment and risk-taking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patick</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/27281/comment-page-1#comment-65284</link>
		<dc:creator>Patick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 03:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=27281#comment-65284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a terrible mess we have gotten ourselves in the Gulf of Mexico! Round up the usual suspects and prosecute them. Let’s parade the unfortunate victims of this circumstance and shout rage at those fat-cats for whatever will stick to them. While we are venting our rage, let’s not forget to acknowledge a fair portion of blame for this circumstance to the group that has had the biggest hand in creating it. I am talking about the powerful Environmental Lobby that is ever-present around the halls of congress. They got what they wanted. They have driven almost all energy exploration off the continental United States, where energy resources are abundant, into fragile offshore waters. Ask yourself: why would any company choose to drill in deep water at a thousand times the cost and hugely more dangerous, compared to doing so on land based sites? The Environmental Lobby is a powerful lobby. Just ask your congressman or congresswoman how much influence the Environmental Lobby has. Most that haven’t been bought-out will tell you the real story. As a congressman once told me; “Almost nothing can get accomplished in congress because of the Environmental Lobby”. Well, let’s give credit where credit is due. The Environmental Lobby has driven common sense solutions into the sea. We have allowed common sense to be pushed aside for radical environmentalism. Most of us believe in a balanced approach to protecting our environment; but we have been out-lobbied. Most radical environmentalists will not see how they are part of the problem. They will see themselves as righteous fighters to preserve all that is pristine. Unintended consequences can and do result from policies that lack common sense. Let’s connect-the-dots! When it comes time to call on those to sit on the hot-seat: let’s don’t forget the Environmental Lobby. They deserve a chance at explaining unintended consequences: after all they had a big hand in it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a terrible mess we have gotten ourselves in the Gulf of Mexico! Round up the usual suspects and prosecute them. Let’s parade the unfortunate victims of this circumstance and shout rage at those fat-cats for whatever will stick to them. While we are venting our rage, let’s not forget to acknowledge a fair portion of blame for this circumstance to the group that has had the biggest hand in creating it. I am talking about the powerful Environmental Lobby that is ever-present around the halls of congress. They got what they wanted. They have driven almost all energy exploration off the continental United States, where energy resources are abundant, into fragile offshore waters. Ask yourself: why would any company choose to drill in deep water at a thousand times the cost and hugely more dangerous, compared to doing so on land based sites? The Environmental Lobby is a powerful lobby. Just ask your congressman or congresswoman how much influence the Environmental Lobby has. Most that haven’t been bought-out will tell you the real story. As a congressman once told me; “Almost nothing can get accomplished in congress because of the Environmental Lobby”. Well, let’s give credit where credit is due. The Environmental Lobby has driven common sense solutions into the sea. We have allowed common sense to be pushed aside for radical environmentalism. Most of us believe in a balanced approach to protecting our environment; but we have been out-lobbied. Most radical environmentalists will not see how they are part of the problem. They will see themselves as righteous fighters to preserve all that is pristine. Unintended consequences can and do result from policies that lack common sense. Let’s connect-the-dots! When it comes time to call on those to sit on the hot-seat: let’s don’t forget the Environmental Lobby. They deserve a chance at explaining unintended consequences: after all they had a big hand in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/27281/comment-page-1#comment-65224</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 11:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=27281#comment-65224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clearly, a lot of the anger towards Mr. Obama is a direct result of our government&#039;s penchant over the years to set itself up as the sole &quot;provider&quot; and &quot;fixer&quot; of everything.  That notion is now coming back home to roost...big time.

The truth is that there is very little Mr. Obama (or, for that matter, any other government bureaucrat) can do at this late stage on this issue other than to &quot;hold people&#039;s hands&quot; and offer government resources to help mitigate its effects. 

That&#039;s because, with a few notable exceptions, politicians and politically appointed bureaucrats are usually NOT engineers.  They simply DO NOT have the engineering expertise in the oil business to apply the required engineering solutions to solve this massively complex engineering problem.  Indeed, the last time I checked, Mr. Obama was a lawyer by degree,  not an engineer.

Mr. Obama&#039;s chance to have any real impact on this issue was completely lost LONG before he took office and long before this incident occurred.  That&#039;s when &quot;Drill, Baby Drill&quot; without also putting proper safeguards (like a mandatory second relief well for all such exploratory drilling) became US Government policy.   As with the banking crisis, our gormless (not to mention hopelessly corrupt) politicians decided to put the &quot;fox&quot; in charge of guarding the &quot;hen house&quot; in the offshore drilling business as well.  And we are now seeing the sad results of those decisions.

Turning that notion around is not going to be easy.  Indeed,  just like every other issue he faces, there are well-funded (not to mention highly entrenched) constituencies in the US Congress that absolutely WANT all that inherently risky (and largely unregulated) offshore drilling to continue unabated.

As I&#039;ve said, by comparison, the &quot;dirty&quot; Canadian oil sands keep looking cleaner and cleaner all the time.  Fortunately, there&#039;s enough oil up there to keep the US (and a good chunk of the rest of the world) well supplied for several decades to come.  Here&#039;s hoping all of our stupid &quot;homeland security&quot; paranoia doesn&#039;t kill THAT &quot;golden goose&quot; as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly, a lot of the anger towards Mr. Obama is a direct result of our government&#8217;s penchant over the years to set itself up as the sole &#8220;provider&#8221; and &#8220;fixer&#8221; of everything.  That notion is now coming back home to roost&#8230;big time.</p>
<p>The truth is that there is very little Mr. Obama (or, for that matter, any other government bureaucrat) can do at this late stage on this issue other than to &#8220;hold people&#8217;s hands&#8221; and offer government resources to help mitigate its effects. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s because, with a few notable exceptions, politicians and politically appointed bureaucrats are usually NOT engineers.  They simply DO NOT have the engineering expertise in the oil business to apply the required engineering solutions to solve this massively complex engineering problem.  Indeed, the last time I checked, Mr. Obama was a lawyer by degree,  not an engineer.</p>
<p>Mr. Obama&#8217;s chance to have any real impact on this issue was completely lost LONG before he took office and long before this incident occurred.  That&#8217;s when &#8220;Drill, Baby Drill&#8221; without also putting proper safeguards (like a mandatory second relief well for all such exploratory drilling) became US Government policy.   As with the banking crisis, our gormless (not to mention hopelessly corrupt) politicians decided to put the &#8220;fox&#8221; in charge of guarding the &#8220;hen house&#8221; in the offshore drilling business as well.  And we are now seeing the sad results of those decisions.</p>
<p>Turning that notion around is not going to be easy.  Indeed,  just like every other issue he faces, there are well-funded (not to mention highly entrenched) constituencies in the US Congress that absolutely WANT all that inherently risky (and largely unregulated) offshore drilling to continue unabated.</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve said, by comparison, the &#8220;dirty&#8221; Canadian oil sands keep looking cleaner and cleaner all the time.  Fortunately, there&#8217;s enough oil up there to keep the US (and a good chunk of the rest of the world) well supplied for several decades to come.  Here&#8217;s hoping all of our stupid &#8220;homeland security&#8221; paranoia doesn&#8217;t kill THAT &#8220;golden goose&#8221; as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
