Comments on: Mullen: Congress should have waited on gay ban vote http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/27250 The oldest political news site on the Internet because nobody's life, liberty or property is safe while Congress is in session. Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:24:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: woody188 http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/27250/comment-page-1#comment-64874 woody188 Wed, 02 Jun 2010 04:28:17 +0000 http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=27250#comment-64874 Pretty sure you are right Mo. This is more about being pressed into service than equal rights. Heck, everyone in the military knows you traded your rights for a chance to shoot people.

]]> By: Mightymo http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/27250/comment-page-1#comment-64821 Mightymo Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:13:17 +0000 http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=27250#comment-64821 Since when has it become military policy to consider the concern of military members before enacting policy change?

What it really comes down to is that if there were a draft, do you think that “I’m Gay” or “I’m a Lesbian” will get you out of the draft?

I don’t think that it will, and if that’s the case, then it certainly shouldn’t prevent someone from volunteering to serve their country any more than the next guy or gal!

]]> By: griff http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/27250/comment-page-1#comment-64805 griff Tue, 01 Jun 2010 14:24:22 +0000 http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=27250#comment-64805 The moral to this story? Once again the Congress pushes forward with legislation with nary a concern or consideration for whom it will actually affect.

]]>