<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Tea Party pot boils over</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/27166/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/27166</link>
	<description>The oldest political news site on the Internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:55:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: griff</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/27166/comment-page-1#comment-64169</link>
		<dc:creator>griff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 01:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=27166#comment-64169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wikipedia as a source? Ha.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wikipedia as a source? Ha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Almandine</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/27166/comment-page-1#comment-64155</link>
		<dc:creator>Almandine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 23:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=27166#comment-64155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a Tea Partisan, of sorts... liberty lover and fiscally responsible individual, in particular, what&#039;s your point?

Questions about racism have been brought to the fore ONLY to serve as &quot;gotcha journalism&quot;.  Ask Doug, Maddow, the Louisville newspaper, etc., why they brought racism up? Neither Rand Paul or anyone else without a reason to fear his electability made a point of it or even care. 

It&#039;s just anopther diversion from the issues that really challenge US.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Tea Partisan, of sorts&#8230; liberty lover and fiscally responsible individual, in particular, what&#8217;s your point?</p>
<p>Questions about racism have been brought to the fore ONLY to serve as &#8220;gotcha journalism&#8221;.  Ask Doug, Maddow, the Louisville newspaper, etc., why they brought racism up? Neither Rand Paul or anyone else without a reason to fear his electability made a point of it or even care. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s just anopther diversion from the issues that really challenge US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Almandine</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/27166/comment-page-1#comment-64154</link>
		<dc:creator>Almandine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 23:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=27166#comment-64154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice, very nice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice, very nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guardhouse lawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/27166/comment-page-1#comment-64147</link>
		<dc:creator>Guardhouse lawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 21:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=27166#comment-64147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not worried that you are uncivilised.  I am worried about your grasp of facts:

&quot;While our current government is run amok and has murdered easily a million people (brown people of course) in the last decade alone you are worried that I am uncivilised.&quot;

1.  Our current government has not been in office for a decade.  It has been in office for about a sixth of that time.

2.  Murdered  a million people? A million?  I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT.  Take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Iraq_War

The range is huge, and the extremely large numbers are based not upon body count but upon opinion polls and include things like this:

&quot;The Lancet study&#039;s figure of 654,965 excess deaths through the end of June 2006  is based on household survey data. The estimate is for all excess violent and nonviolent deaths. That also includes those due to increased lawlessness, degraded infrastructure, poorer healthcare, etc.. 601,027 deaths (range of 426,369 to 793,663 using a 95% confidence interval) were estimated to be due to violence. 31% of those were attributed to the Coalition, 24% to others, 46% unknown. The causes of violent deaths were gunshot (56%), car bomb (13%), other explosion/ordnance (14%), air strike (13%), accident (2%), unknown (2%). A copy of a death certificate was available for a high proportion of the reported deaths (92 per cent of those households asked to produce one).[18][19][20]  Iraq&#039;s Health Minister]&quot;

Death from &quot;increased lawlessness, degraded infrastructure, poorer healthcare, &quot; can hardly be laid at the feet of the United States as examples of  &quot;murder.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not worried that you are uncivilised.  I am worried about your grasp of facts:</p>
<p>&#8220;While our current government is run amok and has murdered easily a million people (brown people of course) in the last decade alone you are worried that I am uncivilised.&#8221;</p>
<p>1.  Our current government has not been in office for a decade.  It has been in office for about a sixth of that time.</p>
<p>2.  Murdered  a million people? A million?  I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT.  Take a look at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Iraq_War" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Iraq_War</a></p>
<p>The range is huge, and the extremely large numbers are based not upon body count but upon opinion polls and include things like this:</p>
<p>&#8220;The Lancet study&#8217;s figure of 654,965 excess deaths through the end of June 2006  is based on household survey data. The estimate is for all excess violent and nonviolent deaths. That also includes those due to increased lawlessness, degraded infrastructure, poorer healthcare, etc.. 601,027 deaths (range of 426,369 to 793,663 using a 95% confidence interval) were estimated to be due to violence. 31% of those were attributed to the Coalition, 24% to others, 46% unknown. The causes of violent deaths were gunshot (56%), car bomb (13%), other explosion/ordnance (14%), air strike (13%), accident (2%), unknown (2%). A copy of a death certificate was available for a high proportion of the reported deaths (92 per cent of those households asked to produce one).[18][19][20]  Iraq&#8217;s Health Minister]&#8221;</p>
<p>Death from &#8220;increased lawlessness, degraded infrastructure, poorer healthcare, &#8221; can hardly be laid at the feet of the United States as examples of  &#8220;murder.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/27166/comment-page-1#comment-64108</link>
		<dc:creator>thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 02:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=27166#comment-64108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m an ivy league educated professional.  The reason I&#039;m defending Rand Paul from Doug Thompson is because Doug Thompson goes out of his way to smear the Paul family by spreading vicious smears.  I believe the uncivilized behavior is on the party of Doug Thompson.  This goes back years on his part.

The danger to this country is and has already been here.  The danger is the Bush and Obama supporters who assassinate american citizens, imprison people without trial, murder thousands of civilians with drone attacks, deny medical supplies to innocent citizens of foreign countries they don&#039;t like with sanctions, invade countries that are no threat to us, and spy on citizens without warrants.That is the threat to the this country.

While our current government is run amok and has murdered easily a million people (brown people of course) in the last decade alone you are worried that I am uncivilised.  Liberty, peace, friendly trade, non-violence here and abroad, those are the hallmarks of civilised behavior.  Those are the principles Rand Paul and people like him support.  It is amazing to me that anyone would equate those positions with uncivilised behavior.

The barbarians are already in charge, we are merely trying to bring about a more sane country, here and abroad.  If you are for unnecessary war, then you are not a civilised human being.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m an ivy league educated professional.  The reason I&#8217;m defending Rand Paul from Doug Thompson is because Doug Thompson goes out of his way to smear the Paul family by spreading vicious smears.  I believe the uncivilized behavior is on the party of Doug Thompson.  This goes back years on his part.</p>
<p>The danger to this country is and has already been here.  The danger is the Bush and Obama supporters who assassinate american citizens, imprison people without trial, murder thousands of civilians with drone attacks, deny medical supplies to innocent citizens of foreign countries they don&#8217;t like with sanctions, invade countries that are no threat to us, and spy on citizens without warrants.That is the threat to the this country.</p>
<p>While our current government is run amok and has murdered easily a million people (brown people of course) in the last decade alone you are worried that I am uncivilised.  Liberty, peace, friendly trade, non-violence here and abroad, those are the hallmarks of civilised behavior.  Those are the principles Rand Paul and people like him support.  It is amazing to me that anyone would equate those positions with uncivilised behavior.</p>
<p>The barbarians are already in charge, we are merely trying to bring about a more sane country, here and abroad.  If you are for unnecessary war, then you are not a civilised human being.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: b mcclellan</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/27166/comment-page-1#comment-64079</link>
		<dc:creator>b mcclellan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 06:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=27166#comment-64079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Geeze, when one asks the simple question, are you racy,
 all manner of inter social queries come about. Why do we continually circumvent ?
Then uninformed uniformed entities raise their bludgeon proof heads and the populace flees as ebb tide.

Such simple creatures haven&#039;t truly earned their freedom yet, and may never.
Llamraf.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geeze, when one asks the simple question, are you racy,<br />
 all manner of inter social queries come about. Why do we continually circumvent ?<br />
Then uninformed uniformed entities raise their bludgeon proof heads and the populace flees as ebb tide.</p>
<p>Such simple creatures haven&#8217;t truly earned their freedom yet, and may never.<br />
Llamraf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guardhouse lawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/27166/comment-page-1#comment-64067</link>
		<dc:creator>Guardhouse lawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 01:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=27166#comment-64067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Tea Partisan:

Do you defend or champion the right of a locally-owned restaurant to refuse to serve blacks or Hispanics?

Do you defend or champion the right of a small company to refuse to hire black or Hispanic workers?

Do you defend or champion the right of a national company like McDonald&#039;s to refuse to serve black or Hispanic customers?

Do you defend or champion the right of a large company like Walmart or GE to refuse to hire black or Hispanic workers?

In answering the questions you may insert the minority of your choice in place of black or Hispanic.

If you answered yes with respect to small businesses and no with respect to large businesses please tell us at exactly what point does a small company become a large company.

For extra credit: bearing in mind that males in the US are a minority, even though slight, please tell us whether you defend or champion the company that refuses to serve a male or to hire a male.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Tea Partisan:</p>
<p>Do you defend or champion the right of a locally-owned restaurant to refuse to serve blacks or Hispanics?</p>
<p>Do you defend or champion the right of a small company to refuse to hire black or Hispanic workers?</p>
<p>Do you defend or champion the right of a national company like McDonald&#8217;s to refuse to serve black or Hispanic customers?</p>
<p>Do you defend or champion the right of a large company like Walmart or GE to refuse to hire black or Hispanic workers?</p>
<p>In answering the questions you may insert the minority of your choice in place of black or Hispanic.</p>
<p>If you answered yes with respect to small businesses and no with respect to large businesses please tell us at exactly what point does a small company become a large company.</p>
<p>For extra credit: bearing in mind that males in the US are a minority, even though slight, please tell us whether you defend or champion the company that refuses to serve a male or to hire a male.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Shaw</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/27166/comment-page-1#comment-64066</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 01:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=27166#comment-64066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I admit that I have not kept up. Lurking.

Kent]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I admit that I have not kept up. Lurking.</p>
<p>Kent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: griff</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/27166/comment-page-1#comment-64046</link>
		<dc:creator>griff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 19:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=27166#comment-64046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A character flaw, I guess.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A character flaw, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: griff</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/27166/comment-page-1#comment-64045</link>
		<dc:creator>griff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 19:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=27166#comment-64045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.&quot; - Plato]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.&#8221; &#8211; Plato</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
