Conservatives come out for Kagan

Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan (Reuters)

Conservative lawyers and academics are voicing support for Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan, praise that could soften criticism from the right and provide cover for any Republican senators inclined to vote for her nomination.

The essence of their take on Kagan, the former Harvard Law School dean who now serves as solicitor general, is that she clearly has the smarts to be a justice and has shown an ability to work with all sides on thorny issues.

“She has had a remarkable and truly unusual record of reaching out across ideological divides,” said Michael McConnell, a former federal appeals court judge who was nominated by President George W. Bush.

Longtime Kagan friend Miguel Estrada, whose appeals court nomination by Bush was blocked by Senate Democrats, said, “She’s clearly qualified for the court and should be confirmed. Obviously, she’s a left-of-center academic who never would have been picked by a Republican. But no one can doubt her intellectual accomplishments.”

In a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee Friday, Estrada said, “If such a person, who has demonstrated great intellect, high accomplishments and an upright life is not easily confirmable, I fear we will have reached a point where no capable person will readily accept a nomination for judicial service.”

Former special prosecutor Kenneth Starr, who ran the investigation that led to President Bill Clinton’s impeachment, said charges by some conservatives that Kagan holds extreme views are off-base.

“That’s politics, and unfortunately confirmation politics have been very ugly, with a few happy interludes, ever since the nomination of Judge Robert Bork,” Starr said on MSNBC.

Conservative interest groups and some senators have raised questions about Kagan’s lack of judicial experience and suggested that she might be a “rubber stamp” for Obama on the high court. They also have seized on her opposition to military recruiters at Harvard over the Pentagon’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy on gay soldiers. The conservative critics argue that she would be a liberal, activist justice.

Carrie Severino, chief counsel to the Judicial Crisis Network, said endorsements by prominent conservatives do nothing to answer the questions about Kagan.

“I don’t think that really changes our analysis,” Severino said. “We’re very interested in finding out what kind of a justice she would be. As of right now, what we see looks very troubling.”

Severino’s group released a video Friday blasting Kagan for barring military recruiters over “don’t ask, don’t tell.” GOP senators have said the decision casts doubt on Kagan’s fitness for the bench.

Thomas Goldstein, a Supreme Court lawyer who writes about the court and nominations for Scotusblog.com, said the support on the right is potentially useful to Kagan.

“When conservative icons strongly endorse Kagan, that knocks the legs out from under the claim that she’s either unqualified or a liberal activist. Those arguments end up looking like pure politics,” Goldstein said. “The endorsements also give critical cover to moderate Republicans who want to vote for her but worry about criticism from the right.”

So far no Republican senator has announced support for Kagan, who received seven GOP votes when she was confirmed as solicitor general last year.

McConnell, who teaches law at Stanford University, agreed with Severino that Kagan’s stand on military recruiters was a “dreadful decision.” But he said that Harvard was like many other major law schools at that time in seeking to bar military recruiters over discrimination against gays. He said the episode was “not a serious black eye.”

He also said that Kagan will be a safe liberal vote in most cases that divide on ideological grounds.

Yet, he said, “As I chat with other center-right law professors, she’s got overwhelming affection and support.”

He attributed some of that support to Kagan’s openness to arguments across the political spectrum.

“She’s a bit unusual in this respect, particularly at this juncture when not just the Supreme Court but the country basically is divided into two camps that often cannot speak to each other,” McConnell said. Kagan, who has known McConnell since their days as law professors at the University of Chicago in the early 1990s, wrote a letter of support for McConnell in 2002 urging Senate Democrats to confirm him.

She and Estrada have been friends since they sat next to each other in several law school classes 25 years ago. And Starr held the same job as Kagan, when he was President George H.W. Bush’s solicitor general.

___

Associated Press writer Julie Hirschfeld Davis contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2010 The Associated Press

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

3 Responses to "Conservatives come out for Kagan"

  1. Jim C  May 17, 2010 at 8:52 am

    Of course they like her , they know she will probably be the sixth conservative vote on issues they really care about . The problem with life long ivy leaguers is that decisions that are life altering to the unwashed masses are simply interesting academic debate to them . Their decisions don’t really effect them or theirs , they are above the fray and the consequences . While I know some will disagree I am also bothered by her being ” friends ” with Estrada . I cannot imagine being ” friends ” with the likes of Scalia , Estrada or Roberts who in different times would no doubt be promoting the inquisition ( Scalia would probably be gleefully applying the implements ” . I believe that after being in the company of or in discussion with any of the aforementioned I would be more inclined to want to take a shower rather than invite them to hit the links . I fear she is going to be as big a disappointment as our grinning jackass of a president , but for much longer .

  2. Klaus Hergeschimmer  May 17, 2010 at 8:39 pm

    Another PNAC rubber stamper Supreme schill from the ‘We Can’ Obomber president

  3. hologram5  May 21, 2010 at 11:09 am

    From things I have read that she wrote, and comments she made, she is not too hip on the second amendment. I hope I am wrong.

Comments are closed.