Comments on: Hillary Clinton on list for Supreme Court nod

By: woody188

woody188 — Tue, 13 Apr 2010 01:42:17 +0000

Will she need to check with the CFR first before each ruling?

By: griff

griff — Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:57:41 +0000

Hey Prozac’s free now. Just walk in any pharmacy and tell ‘em Obama sent ya. I pay taxes, so I got it covered.

By: AustinRanter (AKA Gregg)

AustinRanter (AKA Gregg) — Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:47:40 +0000

Griff,

I know you keep a fresh stock of popcorn and prozac. Hope you don’t mind sharing.

By: Carl Nemo

Carl Nemo — Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:47:07 +0000

For a number of years I’ve had a personal commitment to expose all the tawdry details concerning the Clinton’s during their days in power in Arkansas, but I’ve finally resigned myself to the fact that they are anointed one’s courtesy of the “Kingmaker” H.W. Bush; ie., Mr. CIA as a function of their involvement as “team players” to facilitate “Iran Contra” during the Reagan/H.W. Bush presidency.

The Supreme Court will be a good place for her to age with dignity.

I personally believe we’re toast as a nation so we could have nine monkeys from the National Zoo all made of brass sitting on the bench and do equally or better relative to the Supreme’s record to date at least in the modern era.

Hopefully all her ‘legal skills’ learned during her tenure at the Rose Law Firm in Arkansas will allow her to hammer out sterling briefs. / : |

Carl Nemo **==

By: griff

griff — Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:40:33 +0000

Wow, if the Democrats want to be unceremoniously tossed out of the country on their asses, I say go for it. But of course, any one that opposes her would be portrayed as not only a racist but a sexist too – double whammy! 2008 all over again. What a glorious time to be alive.