Comments on: Supreme Court: Obama’s next battleground http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/26791 The oldest political news site on the Internet Sat, 25 May 2013 08:18:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: b mcclellan http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/26791/comment-page-1#comment-60916 b mcclellan Wed, 07 Apr 2010 23:34:50 +0000 http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=26791#comment-60916 I nominate Captain Tuttle for all the good it will do.

Seriously, they will grease the wheels with Duff and keep the single malt for themselves as always, no matter what figurehead warms the seat.

]]> By: AustinRanter (AKA Gregg) http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/26791/comment-page-1#comment-60911 AustinRanter (AKA Gregg) Wed, 07 Apr 2010 22:11:23 +0000 http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=26791#comment-60911 So, how many years has it taken the Supreme Court to completely shift from ruling on the constitutionality of issues to full blown activitism?

My vote is for Homer Simpson for the next SCJ.

]]> By: tc http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/26791/comment-page-1#comment-60909 tc Wed, 07 Apr 2010 20:30:11 +0000 http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=26791#comment-60909 Waiting until after the next election only insures that the nomination will be made to a Senate with less Democrats than today. There can be no expectation of a difference in cooperation then or now. Retire now, and deal with any obstruction. While I’m at it, Obama should name a suitably liberal candidate for the seat. Not to do so will only harden the conservative balance on the Court which is young in age, and likely to stay for a long time.

]]> By: griff http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/26791/comment-page-1#comment-60878 griff Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:23:31 +0000 http://www.capitolhillblue.com/?p=26791#comment-60878 Oh boy, grab your popcorn and Prozac, this is gonna be a theatrical extravaganza as only our media can produce.

]]>