Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone

Democrats split ranks over war funding bill

By
May 24, 2007

Joe Biden and Barack ObamaDemocratic presidential contenders on Capitol Hill will cast critical votes on the Iraq war this week, when lawmakers decide on a $120 billion bill to keep military operations afloat through September. The House planned to vote Thursday with the Senate to follow suit by week's end.

The legislation does not set the deadline for U.S. troop withdrawals many Democrats wanted. Unable to achieve the two-thirds majority needed to override one presidential veto because of such a deadline — or the threat of another — Democratic leaders announced Tuesday they would proceed to provide money for the war anyway because they wanted to support the troops.

"I believe as long as we have troops in the front line, we're going to have to protect them," said Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Del. "We're going to have to fund them."

Biden was alone among the potential Democratic candidates in immediately pledging his support for the bill.

Two front-runners, Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois, declined to say how they intended to vote on the measure.

Both have voted against binding timetables for troop withdrawals in the past, before public sentiment against the war hardened or they became presidential contenders. Last week, the two voted to advance legislation that would have cut off money for U.S. combat operations by March 31, 2008, cutoff.

Challengers Sen. Christopher Dodd of Connecticut and Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio said they would oppose the measure because in their view it issued a blank check to President Bush on the Iraq war.

"Half-measures and equivocations are not going to change our course in Iraq," Dodd said in a statement. "If we are serious about ending the war, Congress must stand up to this president's failed policy now — with clarity and conviction."

The hefty spending bill has become a lightning rod for political attacks on Bush and his handling of the deeply unpopular war, which has killed more than 3,400 U.S. troops and cost more than $300 billion. But it also has exposed a sharp divide among Democrats on how far Congress should go to end the war.

Democratic candidates are vying for the anti-war vote, but at the same time do not want to appear as though they are turning their backs on the military.

The bill includes about $100 billion for military and diplomatic efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as $8 billion in domestic projects such as farm aid and hurricane relief and $9 billion in military-related spending such as improved health care for service members.

While the measure does not include a timetable on the war, it does threaten to withhold U.S. aid dollars for Iraq if Baghdad fails to make progress on political and security reforms. The president, however, could waive that restriction.

Biden said that while he would vote for the measure, he disagreed with the approach because it could hamper the Iraqi government's ability to take on more responsibility.

The legislation resulted after weeks of negotiations with the White House, which agreed to accept $17 billion in funding not requested by Bush as long as there were not restrictions on the military campaign.

Democratic leaders planned multiple votes in the House on Thursday to ensure the measure would ultimately pass because of disagreements among members on elements of the bill. One vote was to be on war funding, while another would be to approve the extra money for domestic and military-related projects.

While liberal Democrats were expected to vote against the war funds measure, GOP members were expected to make up for the losses. On the added spending, Democrats likely were to be unified in their support for the measure, overcoming GOP objections.

5 Responses to Democrats split ranks over war funding bill

  1. www.nazilieskill.us

    May 24, 2007 at 11:01 am

    John Hanks, Laramie, Wyoming

    Since when does it help to pay maggots like Bush extortion? It isn’t even a down payment on a ransom, and no promise of releasing our pentagon hostages. THE WAR WILL CONTINUE AS LONG AS THERE IS MONEY TO BE MADE.

  2. Klaus Hergeschimmer

    May 24, 2007 at 5:46 pm

    WHEN DANGER REARED ITS UGLY HEAD, NANCY & HARRY TURNED AND
    FLED. BRAVE -BRAVE -BRAVE -BRAVE DEMOCRATS

    THE DEMS BATTLE CALL, LIKE IN MONTY PYTHON & THE HØLY GRAIL IS:
    “RUN AWAY, RUN AWAY”

    The Dems are little more than PIMPS giving Bush his money.
    The Democrats will regret this decision.
    I have never been more ashamed of the SpinelessCrats.

    I have changed my voter registration to ‘Decline to State’, I am through
    with those Spineless Bastards.

  3. Access Of Evil

    May 24, 2007 at 9:14 pm

    I’m waiting for the day when it no longer matters what Hillary and Obama do on their vote.

    If the Demos were “loyal to the troops” they’d bring them home.

    “No, sorry Dumbass . . . We’re done funding this death machine you call ‘the war on terror.'”

  4. Ardie

    May 24, 2007 at 9:24 pm

    There are military super bases being constructed in the oil bearing region of Iraq. The Pentagon refers to them as “lilly pads”. When these bases have been completed, then we will redeploy our troops. Many of the troops will simply go to these self-contained lilly pads. Meanwhile, back home, the voter will be given the impression that the war in Iraq is over when in fact it is a shell game. Bottom line, when you know the date these bases will be completed, you will know when the troops will be coming home–but actually they are not coming home.
    Presently, the situation of the U.S. government is like the situation in France during World War II. There was the Vichy and then the Germans. The Germans had the final say, but they permitted the Vichy to take care of the government on a day to day basis. The French citizens became essentially slave labor for the Germans, but lived under the illusion of being independent. The U.S. is like the Vichy. Those who control us are really the military-industrial complex. Washington D.C. is the Vichy government. When it comes to deciding about Iraq the military-industrial complex makes the decision. It is Washington’s role to sell it, like the Vichy sold the French the illusion of independence.

    And there you have it. We will never leave Iraq.

  5. Klaus Hergeschimmer

    May 25, 2007 at 5:29 am

    Your anology of the Germans and the Vichy goverment is right on the mark.

    The Military Superbases, the biggest US Super-Emabassy. The Democrats
    got those things in their portfolio and get some bucks from the folks who
    construct the McSuperMilitary McSuperBases & the McSuper McEmbassy.

    By and large the Democrats are enabling the PNAC manifesto to
    play out.

    FU*K THE SACK O.S. DEMOCRATS