Pelosi protects House bully John Murtha

In actions that continue to discredit her promise to demand ethical behavior in Congress, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi defends the actions of Democratic bully John Murtha, a Pennsylvania Congressman with a long history of questionable behavior.

Pelosi is blocking demands for a reprimand of Murtha for threatening a GOP lawmaker's spending projects.

Pelosi claims she had "no idea what actually happened" during a noisy exchange in the House chamber last week between Reps. John P. Murtha, D-Pa., and Mike Rogers, R-Mich.

"What I do know is that Congressman Murtha has — enjoys — an excellent reputation in the Congress on both sides of the aisle," said Pelosi in a broadcast interview taped Friday and aired Sunday.

Pelosi is lying. Murtha has a rotten reputation on both sides of the aisle, so rotten that her fellow Democrats rejected the ethics-challenged Congressman when she backed him for majority leader. He has a long record of using intimidation tactics against others in Congress.

Murtha has a history of selling votes for contributions and other favors and failed to report a bribery attempt during the FBI's "Abscam" sting operation, offering as a defense that he wanted to "keep lines of communication open" with the one offering the bribe because "he might have been able to help my district."

Murtha was not indicted in the investigation but questions remained over his less-than-above board conduct.

The Associated Press reports:

"He (Murtha) writes the defense appropriation bill in a bipartisan way each year and with the complete involvement of the Republicans as to who gets what on the Republican side," she said.

Murtha is a 35-year House veteran who leads the House Appropriations subcommittee on military spending. He is known for a fondness for earmarks — carefully targeted spending items placed in appropriations bills to benefit a specific lawmaker or favored constituent group.

During a series of House votes Thursday, Murtha walked to the GOP side to confront Rogers, a former FBI agent. This month, Rogers had tried unsuccessfully to strike from an intelligence spending bill an item that would restore $23 million for the National Drug Intelligence Center, a facility in Murtha's Pennsylvania district.

According to Rogers' account, which Murtha did not dispute, the Democrat angrily told Rogers he should never seek earmarks of his own because "you're not going to get any, now or forever."

"This was clearly designed to try to intimidate me," Rogers told The Associated Press on Friday. "He said it loud enough for other people to hear."

House rules prohibit lawmakers from placing conditions on earmarks or targeted tax benefits that are based on another member's votes.

Murtha's office said in a statement: "The committee and staff give every Democrat and Republican the same consideration. We have extensive hearings and every request is given careful consideration. We will continue to do just that."

Rogers said he planned to file a "privileged resolution" Monday that would seek a House vote on whether to reprimand Murtha.

"I wasn't there" for the confrontation, Pelosi said. "I do know that the Republicans caused quite a stir that was unjustified on the floor of the House, and I'm sure things were said on both sides."

She added, "I don't know that there was going to be a resolution. There was rumor that that might be the form it would take, but we'll deal with it if that's what comes forward. But I think Mr. Murtha's reputation for bipartisanship will hold him in good stead."

During leadership elections after Democrats regained control of the House in November, Pelosi aggressively backed Murtha in his bid to become majority leader, the No. 2 position. He lost to Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md.

3 Responses to "Pelosi protects House bully John Murtha"

  1. SEAL  May 20, 2007 at 8:22 pm

    Murtha is the poster child for term limits.

  2. EdEKit  May 21, 2007 at 12:16 am

    Last thing I want is to see a donnybrook between two of my favorite Democrats. I am going to trust Pelosi’s judgement on this issue. I am going to go even further. If Murtha done it it needed to be done. Of course, I got suspicious of a lot of Democrats when Pelosi’s muscle got turned down for the leadership position, and that suspicion continues. If Liberals are going to make progress they are going to have to step on some toes, and some of the toes are attached to Democratic Feet.

    Home on the range, or in the oven. It does not get too hot for me. I grew up in Southern Arizona.

  3. JudyB  May 21, 2007 at 11:48 am

    I despise the fact that there is now and always has been deals made and riders added to get bills passed. This is a practice that both parties participate in that has become acceptable and expected. Negotiating should not mean cutting deals. When are our Congressmen(persons) going to put Americas needs first and their bids for making points in their districts (in hopes of getting re-elected)their priority? I realize that one term is just to short to get many things done but if congressmen only had one term to serve there would be no deals cut in hopes if being re-elected.

Comments are closed.