Rewriting history in real time

Memories are always selective in politics. Candidates concentrate on what makes them look best and forget those embarrassing little moments that put them in a bad light.

Call it rewriting history in real time. Call it selective omission. Call it outright lying. They all do it.

Writes Mark Leibovich in The New York Times:

Stealing a page from the Soviet playbook, the current crop of presidential candidates has taken to eliminating whole chapters of their histories.

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton’s turbulent final years as first lady? While Mrs. Clinton, a New York Democrat, frequently invokes husband Bill on the stump, she has managed to avoid any mention of his impeachment and the unpleasantness leading to it.

Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona, almost never brings up campaign finance overhaul, perhaps his signature achievement in the Senate. The McCain-Feingold finance law is loathed by many of the conservatives Mr. McCain is courting, and he typically only discusses the measure when opponents hurl it at him — as Mitt Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, did in a debate on Tuesday.

For his part, Mr. Romney likes to promote his experience as a governor, but is often coy about the state he governed. (Hint: It is viewed by many Republicans as an outpost of run-amok liberalism.) In campaign advertisements in early primary states, Mr. Romney boasts that he was “the Republican governor who turned around a Democratic state” and “vetoed hundreds of spending appropriations.” But you would never know where.

Didn’t John Edwards once run for vice president? Mr. Edwards, a Democrat and former senator from North Carolina, tends to erase his stint as What’s His Name’s running mate in 2004.

It is no revelation that campaigns conspicuously omit things. There are always unpleasant facts, episodes or viewpoints that run counter to the public self a candidate is marketing. But one of the striking features of the 2008 campaigns is the pungency of the various elephants in the various rooms. Candidates are strenuously de-emphasizing or ignoring completely experiences that are defining and, in many cases, extremely well known.

“There’s always a tension between what can be said, what should be said and what must be said,” said Edward Widmer, a historian at Brown University who was speechwriter for Mr. Clinton. “The first candidate to calibrate this tension may move to the head of the pack.”

2 Responses to "Rewriting history in real time"

  1. kent shaw  May 17, 2007 at 10:52 pm

    It is too soon to make possibly unwarranted accusations but it is my recent experience that a certain well known news website ( NOT CHB ) which allows postings immediately after articles ( LIKE CHB DOES ) has been deleting posts in real time.

    I have logged out of the website and logged back in and it makes no difference. I have closed and reopened my browser and it makes no difference.

    One reads through a column of comments, enters a refresh command and finds that some of the comments have disappeared. Not just one’s own comments but the comments of others, too.

    This can happen repeatedly over a few minutes of browsing/blogging. Very strange.

    I can’t help wondering if that particular website has been hacked, or if maybe a simple system malfunction has occurred.

    The point is that it was MOST surprising to me to observe this phenomenon on that particular website.

    (not a conspiracist, but merely an observer, well, maybe a paranoid observer…)

    Kent Shaw

  2. kent shaw  May 17, 2007 at 11:05 pm

    of the type of message purged from that as of now and likely forever unnamed website.

    “Didn’t John Edwards once run for vice president? Mr. Edwards, a Democrat and former senator from North Carolina, tends to erase his stint as What’s His Name’s running mate in 2004.”

    It is my humble opinion that Kerry/Edwards was the skull and bones certified ‘plan team b’ and that it was their job to run campaign light. There were so many unaddressed issues with which they could have hammered Bush/Cheney. Oh, like W’s violation of SEC trading rules (late reporting of inside stock sale just prior to poor quarterly report). There is still a question of the fairness of the vote count in parts of Ohio which the Republicans needed to win.

    Anyway, those kinds of comments get censored on some other websites. Doug, if I’ve overstepped let me know. But thats my story and I’m stickin’ to it.

    Kent Shaw aka Douglas Kent Shaw

Comments are closed.