Candidates go into attack mode

042907obama.jpg
Sen. Barack Obama (AP)

Democrats stepped up the campaign rhetoric Saturday, going on the attack against President George W. Bush and his failed Iraq war.

Republicans, in the meantime, attacked each other.

On the Democratic front, The Associated Press reports:

Wooing influential California Democrats, presidential contender Barack Obama vowed to “turn the page on this Iraq disaster” while Hillary Rodham Clinton denounced President Bush’s conduct of the war as “one of the darkest blots on leadership we’ve ever had.”

California, long a major cash source for candidates of both parties, is poised to become more influential in the electoral process as well, having moved its primary to next Feb. 5. As a result, the state Democratic weekend convention was expected to attract all the party’s major presidential contenders except Delaware Sen. Joe Biden, who was campaigning in South Carolina.

Saturday’s program featured appearances by front-runners Clinton and Obama, as well as Connecticut Sen. Chris Dodd and Ohio Rep. Dennis Kucinich.

Clinton unleashed an unusually personal critique of Bush, accusing his administration of ignoring scientific evidence about global warming and stem cell research and lying about the effects of toxic dust at the World Trade Center site.

Her voice hoarse from days of campaigning, Clinton brought the 2,000 delegates to their feet when she said she wished she could turn the clock back to a different time.

“Somebody said to me that he wished we could just rewind the 21st century and just eliminate the Bush-Cheney administration, with all their mistakes and misjudgments,” she said to cheers. “People are ready for leaders who understand it is our votes who put them in power, our tax dollars that pay the bills.”

Obama, who has made his early opposition to the Iraq conflict a central theme of his campaign, told delegates he was proud to have bucked popular opinion at the time. It was a subtle but direct jab at Clinton, who voted in 2002 to grant Bush authority to invade Iraq.

He also renewed his call for the political parties to find common ground where they could and declared it was time to “turn the page” on issues like health care, education and energy independence.

But he, like Clinton, also leveled a sharp critique of Bush, saying “the president may occupy the White House, but for the last six years the position of leader of the free world has remained open.” And he characterized the administration’s foreign policy as “bluster and bombast.”

Obama and Clinton both called on Bush to sign legislation passed by Congress last week tying funding of the war to a timeline for removing troops. Bush has indicated he will veto the bill.

Both Obama and Clinton were received warmly by the left-leaning, activist crowd — a stark contrast to the same convention four years ago, when the party was bitterly divided over the Iraq war.

There, former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean — then a little-known figure in the 2004 Democratic field — thrilled delegates with his fiery denunciation of the conflict. His rivals at the time, including Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry, who eventually won the nomination, were loudly booed for defending their 2002 vote to authorize the war.

Clinton cast the same vote in 2002, but met with only sporadic heckling during her speech.

The New York senator also promised to “treat all Americans with dignity and equality no matter who you are and who you love.” The pledge was a clear bow to California’s politically active and influential gay community.

She lambasted the speech nearly four years ago, in which Bush — under a “Mission Accomplished” banner on an aircraft carrier returning to home port — declared an end to major military actions in Iraq.

That speech, Clinton said, was “one of the most shameful episodes in American history. … The only mission he accomplished was the re-election of Republicans.”

Dodd echoed the day’s anti-war sentiment in his remarks.

“My friends, this is not about cutting and running,” he said, accusing the White House of trying to police a civil war.

Earlier Saturday, candidates who attended South Carolina’s party convention said they thought the United States has lost its global standing during Bush’s presidency. America, they said, needs a Democratic commander in chief to restore its place in the world.

“We are today internationally and domestically a nation that is no longer a leader,” New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson said.

Former Sen. John Edwards, the 2004 vice presidential nominee, said the world needs to see that “America can be a force for good.”

“What their perception is that America is a bully and we only care about our short-term interests,” Edwards said. “The starting place is to end the bleeding sore that is the war in Iraq.”

Richardson, Edwards and Biden said they would make ending the war a priority.

“The American people are looking for us as Democrats,” said Biden, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. “They’re looking for someone literally, not figuratively, to restore America’s place in the world.”

Meanwhile, on the Republican campaign front, CNN’s Bill Schneider reports:

When it comes to Ronald Reagan’s 11th commandment — “Thou shalt not speak ill of thy fellow Republicans” — GOP presidential candidates seem to be losing their religion.

Republican candidates have been speaking a lot of ill — sometimes quite directly.

“Governor [Mitt] Romney, his views … have been moderate to liberal in [the] North, in the Northeast, and it’s all on videotape,” former Virginia Gov. Jim Gilmore said on “The Situation Room” recently. “And now he’s trying to shift to be a conservative.”

At a Republican dinner in Iowa this month, Gilmore took on his party’s front-runners collectively, saying, “Rudy McRomney is not a conservative.”

The former Massachusetts governor’s response? He said his rivals — Sen. John McCain and former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani — have changed their minds on issues, too.

And talk about speaking ill of a fellow Republican, President Bush is not off limits:

“We all know the war in Iraq has not gone well,” McCain said. “We have made mistakes, and we have paid grievously for them.”

Bush is very unpopular. Conservatives want to make the point that it’s not because he’s a conservative. Instead, they say, it’s because his administration has wandered away from conservative principles.

Republicans are supposed to be disciplined and on message. Not this time.

It has been said that when Democrats lose an election, they form a circular firing squad. Last year, Republicans lost. So it’s their turn to fire on one another.

2 Responses to "Candidates go into attack mode"

  1. Sandy Price  April 29, 2007 at 7:01 am

    On the internet, on the streets and even in our homes, everyone is labeled a conservative or a liberal. This is wearing very thin! We all see America in different eyes and most of us are made up of a little conservative values and some liberal values thrown in for a balance of equality.

    What we all share is a desire for an honest white house. I look at the candidates in both parties and see a dozen agendas working to knock others off the podium and then try to put themselves in a positive mode. It is not working!

    We need a third party who will blow the others off the podium. We know our American values are not represented by the two parties, why do we even bother with them?

  2. Carl Nemo  May 1, 2007 at 12:24 am

    Obama has a nice basso profundo voice. He’s intellectually agile on his feet etc., but he’s still showing a “yellow alert” on my status panel?! He’s playing it safe, very safe. I’d like to think he’s shining AIPAC on to get their support then he’ll give them the old shoe up their collective butts once in office. But there’s hazards to that type of behavior because he might end up like Kennedy!

    The people that are pulling globalist strings and are also the puppeteers controlling our Congressmen and Senators are incredibly dangerous denizens of the geo-political “deep”!

    So unless he can give us a wink, or some cryptic language to let us know that he’s really on our side and that he has a plan to neutralize or destroy this evil influence over American politics, then I say he’s one uv’em and “we the people” will be forgotten the minute he’s sworn into office. I surely hope black citizens don’t support him simply because he’s black. Big mistake! The worst cop in a black neighborhood is the “black cop”… ;)

Comments are closed.