<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yes, guns are the problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/2274/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/2274</link>
	<description>The oldest political news site on the Internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:02:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GrndLkNatv</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/2274/comment-page-1#comment-13059</link>
		<dc:creator>GrndLkNatv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-13059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually the problem is people, if a gun is left on the table with nobody near it, it won&#039;t shoot anyone, but once you put an idiot behind the trigger, bad things happen.  Same thing goes for cars and idiots who write columns....

Generation X Virginian]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the problem is people, if a gun is left on the table with nobody near it, it won&#8217;t shoot anyone, but once you put an idiot behind the trigger, bad things happen.  Same thing goes for cars and idiots who write columns&#8230;.</p>
<p>Generation X Virginian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JerZGirl</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/2274/comment-page-1#comment-13065</link>
		<dc:creator>JerZGirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-13065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mental illness and a society that thrives on gore and graphic violence are to blame.  If Cho hadn&#039;t had a gun to use, he&#039;d have found another weapon.  The gun did not make him kill - his state of mind made him kill, and he&#039;d have killed regardless of the available weapon.  It is time to stop blaming the object and putting the blame where it belongs.  While I don&#039;t advocate a &quot;Wild West&quot; setting, I do agree with one student who said that if concealed weapons were permitted (even if only the faculty), it is not likely the death toll would have been this high.  Either someone would have stopped Cho literally dead in his tracks (probably his ultimate goal anyway) or he&#039;d have hesitated to make the attempt (if he wasn&#039;t looking to die).  Violent crime and burglary decreased dramatically in Kennesaw, GA, after they mandated that all households would own guns.  What criminal without a death wish would risk his life breaking in when he knew someone there might shoot?  (www.rense.com/general9/gunlaw.htm)  So, no - guns are NOT the problem.  Not at all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mental illness and a society that thrives on gore and graphic violence are to blame.  If Cho hadn&#8217;t had a gun to use, he&#8217;d have found another weapon.  The gun did not make him kill &#8211; his state of mind made him kill, and he&#8217;d have killed regardless of the available weapon.  It is time to stop blaming the object and putting the blame where it belongs.  While I don&#8217;t advocate a &#8220;Wild West&#8221; setting, I do agree with one student who said that if concealed weapons were permitted (even if only the faculty), it is not likely the death toll would have been this high.  Either someone would have stopped Cho literally dead in his tracks (probably his ultimate goal anyway) or he&#8217;d have hesitated to make the attempt (if he wasn&#8217;t looking to die).  Violent crime and burglary decreased dramatically in Kennesaw, GA, after they mandated that all households would own guns.  What criminal without a death wish would risk his life breaking in when he knew someone there might shoot?  (www.rense.com/general9/gunlaw.htm)  So, no &#8211; guns are NOT the problem.  Not at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davek</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/2274/comment-page-1#comment-13067</link>
		<dc:creator>davek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-13067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One only has to be a student of history to know that there always have been and always will be crazy individuals that do crazy things. America already has sufficient laws in place to punish such crimes. For those intent on committing such atrocities there are no laws one can put in to place to keep them from their sick motives. The question should be asked, &quot;Would this have happened if all Americans had the right to carry concealed weapons?&quot; The answer, again from an historical perspective of the facts, is a resounding &quot;No&quot;. Anytime we make it easier for criminals to carry out their crimes by leaving the rest of the populace defenseless we become part of the problem. Further restricting firearms ownership, in direct violation of the inspired provisions of our Founding Fathers, would facilitate the criminal and their intent and infringe on the individual citizen&#039;s right to liberty and ultimate freedom. One can look at the dismal failure of England, Australia, Nazi Germany and any Communist country, to understand that restriction of man&#039;s inherent right to defend him/herself only results in tyranny of one form or another. What we need as a nation is the moral courage to stand for our Constitutional principles, embrace them and practice them daily.
ConstitutionalPatriot]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One only has to be a student of history to know that there always have been and always will be crazy individuals that do crazy things. America already has sufficient laws in place to punish such crimes. For those intent on committing such atrocities there are no laws one can put in to place to keep them from their sick motives. The question should be asked, &#8220;Would this have happened if all Americans had the right to carry concealed weapons?&#8221; The answer, again from an historical perspective of the facts, is a resounding &#8220;No&#8221;. Anytime we make it easier for criminals to carry out their crimes by leaving the rest of the populace defenseless we become part of the problem. Further restricting firearms ownership, in direct violation of the inspired provisions of our Founding Fathers, would facilitate the criminal and their intent and infringe on the individual citizen&#8217;s right to liberty and ultimate freedom. One can look at the dismal failure of England, Australia, Nazi Germany and any Communist country, to understand that restriction of man&#8217;s inherent right to defend him/herself only results in tyranny of one form or another. What we need as a nation is the moral courage to stand for our Constitutional principles, embrace them and practice them daily.<br />
ConstitutionalPatriot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy Price</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/2274/comment-page-1#comment-13070</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-13070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and we are not under the authority of our government.  Our government does what we tell it to do.  I&#039;m very tired of people who run to Big Daddy everytime a tragedy happens in America.  We ask &quot;our Father in the White House&quot; to ban abortions, and gay marriages and death with dignity and now to remove our arms.  For God&#039;s sake where does this end?  You sound like a Communist wanting the same rules and regulations for everyone in America.  

Had that University been armed that killer would have been taken down before he had a chance to kill 30 more kids.  Had he not had a gun, he would have used dynamite or whatever the Oklahoma killer used.  Had one or two of those students been armed the disaster would have been much less.  

This mess in VT calls for more guns to be issued to well trained students for their own protection.  I will never give up a weapon to a government led by a lying coniving enemy of freedom.  In fact I will never give up a weapon to anyone.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and we are not under the authority of our government.  Our government does what we tell it to do.  I&#8217;m very tired of people who run to Big Daddy everytime a tragedy happens in America.  We ask &#8220;our Father in the White House&#8221; to ban abortions, and gay marriages and death with dignity and now to remove our arms.  For God&#8217;s sake where does this end?  You sound like a Communist wanting the same rules and regulations for everyone in America.  </p>
<p>Had that University been armed that killer would have been taken down before he had a chance to kill 30 more kids.  Had he not had a gun, he would have used dynamite or whatever the Oklahoma killer used.  Had one or two of those students been armed the disaster would have been much less.  </p>
<p>This mess in VT calls for more guns to be issued to well trained students for their own protection.  I will never give up a weapon to a government led by a lying coniving enemy of freedom.  In fact I will never give up a weapon to anyone.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevns007</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/2274/comment-page-1#comment-13075</link>
		<dc:creator>kevns007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-13075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, man, guns don&#039;t kill people, bullets do.  Tax bullets so that they cost $100 a bullet, and see how many lives would be saved?  And, it would also give a big &#039;fuck you&#039; to the gun lobby. It&#039;s the best answer to a horrifying problem.  Had ammo been costly, how much could that little piss-ant freak have afforded?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, man, guns don&#8217;t kill people, bullets do.  Tax bullets so that they cost $100 a bullet, and see how many lives would be saved?  And, it would also give a big &#8216;fuck you&#8217; to the gun lobby. It&#8217;s the best answer to a horrifying problem.  Had ammo been costly, how much could that little piss-ant freak have afforded?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Horn</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/2274/comment-page-1#comment-13076</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Horn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-13076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guns are not the problem.  A gun is a mechanical device, it has neither the mental nor physical ability to operate itself.  Saying a Glock was responsible for the tragedy at VT is like blaming Boeing for 9/11.

I rest the blame on the shoulders of our &quot;compassionate conservative&quot; society, which refuses to deal with mental illness.  In fact, as a society, we refuse to deal with any illness, we force that off onto the individuals.

If there were universal health care - physical and mental (I see no distinction between the two, except that we are more able to influence our own physical health when it comes to being over weight or eating the wrong foods) - with no stigma attached to those suffering with mental illness - if we were an inclusive society rather than a somewhat class based socially excluding one, if we were, well, kind, then perhaps we could avoid these situations.

The Glock in question was simply the tool this individual selected, he could have as easily built a bomb/vest or some other device, with the same consequence.  It was not the gun that killed those innocents, it was a deranged, troubled individual who, perhaps for the first time in his young life, felt like he was &quot;in charge&quot;, he wasn&#039;t getting laughed at, in fact it&#039;s reported that towards the end, before he took his own life, he was laughing.

Peace

Steve]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guns are not the problem.  A gun is a mechanical device, it has neither the mental nor physical ability to operate itself.  Saying a Glock was responsible for the tragedy at VT is like blaming Boeing for 9/11.</p>
<p>I rest the blame on the shoulders of our &#8220;compassionate conservative&#8221; society, which refuses to deal with mental illness.  In fact, as a society, we refuse to deal with any illness, we force that off onto the individuals.</p>
<p>If there were universal health care &#8211; physical and mental (I see no distinction between the two, except that we are more able to influence our own physical health when it comes to being over weight or eating the wrong foods) &#8211; with no stigma attached to those suffering with mental illness &#8211; if we were an inclusive society rather than a somewhat class based socially excluding one, if we were, well, kind, then perhaps we could avoid these situations.</p>
<p>The Glock in question was simply the tool this individual selected, he could have as easily built a bomb/vest or some other device, with the same consequence.  It was not the gun that killed those innocents, it was a deranged, troubled individual who, perhaps for the first time in his young life, felt like he was &#8220;in charge&#8221;, he wasn&#8217;t getting laughed at, in fact it&#8217;s reported that towards the end, before he took his own life, he was laughing.</p>
<p>Peace</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne K Dolik</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/2274/comment-page-1#comment-13079</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne K Dolik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-13079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My gut reaction to this â€œeventâ€ raises more questions than a call for gun control. Of course, there are those kinds that prefer to have their government make all of their decisions and thus loose all their civil liberties in the process. We have seen the demise of many recently. I have frequently told close friends, the guns would be next, if we are turning towards fascism.

Was the shooter a patsy? Who were his handlers? We need a thorough honest investigation into these shooter connections. I am greatly troubled by the scale of this and the timing of it as well. Let us not be to quick to judge without the facts.

Events have happened in Scotland and Australia. The end result was the confiscation of all firearms. 

Now comes new information, this was a failure of the system. This person was a person of interest for quite some time. He was put in mental institutions for two times, once for stalking and once reported to authorities by his parents as suicidal. Charges were not filed, but the University was notified that they had a problem with this individual. The Shooter was crying out for help, yet everyone let him down. He was in desperate need of Mental Health Care. We made this guy a patsy, because of our in-action.

Then I ask where were the brave men that should have broken those doors down and shot the shooter and saved those children? 3 hours? Give me a break. 
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My gut reaction to this â€œeventâ€ raises more questions than a call for gun control. Of course, there are those kinds that prefer to have their government make all of their decisions and thus loose all their civil liberties in the process. We have seen the demise of many recently. I have frequently told close friends, the guns would be next, if we are turning towards fascism.</p>
<p>Was the shooter a patsy? Who were his handlers? We need a thorough honest investigation into these shooter connections. I am greatly troubled by the scale of this and the timing of it as well. Let us not be to quick to judge without the facts.</p>
<p>Events have happened in Scotland and Australia. The end result was the confiscation of all firearms. </p>
<p>Now comes new information, this was a failure of the system. This person was a person of interest for quite some time. He was put in mental institutions for two times, once for stalking and once reported to authorities by his parents as suicidal. Charges were not filed, but the University was notified that they had a problem with this individual. The Shooter was crying out for help, yet everyone let him down. He was in desperate need of Mental Health Care. We made this guy a patsy, because of our in-action.</p>
<p>Then I ask where were the brave men that should have broken those doors down and shot the shooter and saved those children? 3 hours? Give me a break. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jarrodlombardo</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/2274/comment-page-1#comment-13086</link>
		<dc:creator>jarrodlombardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-13086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every decision is based on trade-offs.  Gun control regulations make some things more secure and other things less secure.  If guns were banned, there would be fewer guns out there, but the guns that would be out there will only be in the possession of the criminals and the government.  If the populace has no means of defending itself from the government if needed, there is nothing to keep the government from becoming a totalitarian or fascist state.

I personally, would rather have the number of gun crimes we currently have than no guns allowed.  The cost versus the benefit makes sense to me.  Others will place different values on different things and may come to different conclusions.

--Jarrod]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every decision is based on trade-offs.  Gun control regulations make some things more secure and other things less secure.  If guns were banned, there would be fewer guns out there, but the guns that would be out there will only be in the possession of the criminals and the government.  If the populace has no means of defending itself from the government if needed, there is nothing to keep the government from becoming a totalitarian or fascist state.</p>
<p>I personally, would rather have the number of gun crimes we currently have than no guns allowed.  The cost versus the benefit makes sense to me.  Others will place different values on different things and may come to different conclusions.</p>
<p>&#8211;Jarrod</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Razor</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/2274/comment-page-1#comment-13088</link>
		<dc:creator>Razor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-13088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If guns are outlawed then only outlaws will have guns. I have always believed that if everyone was packing a gun on thier hip, you would not see the violence that so often occurs. When everyone has the means to defend against violence or attack, then those who are the attackers would think twice about committing the act of robbery or assault if they knew they would be shot. Guns only intimidate those who have none. A bully counts on an advantage in size, unless the victim has something called an equalizer ( 44mag ). Then due respect replaces the attack bully mentality.

Once we give up our right to bear arms, were for sure totally enslaved. NEVER GIVE UP YOUR RIGHTS.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If guns are outlawed then only outlaws will have guns. I have always believed that if everyone was packing a gun on thier hip, you would not see the violence that so often occurs. When everyone has the means to defend against violence or attack, then those who are the attackers would think twice about committing the act of robbery or assault if they knew they would be shot. Guns only intimidate those who have none. A bully counts on an advantage in size, unless the victim has something called an equalizer ( 44mag ). Then due respect replaces the attack bully mentality.</p>
<p>Once we give up our right to bear arms, were for sure totally enslaved. NEVER GIVE UP YOUR RIGHTS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tango7</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/2274/comment-page-1#comment-13095</link>
		<dc:creator>Tango7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-13095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While your quote from the Utah parents is touching, I believe their &quot;14 children a day&quot; figure was a plant, courtesy of the Brady bunch et al, and includes suicides and juvenile gang bangers killed by police while committing crimes.

Not exactly a fair comparison to lawful gun ownership.

In addition, if the figures you use are correct:

&lt;cite&gt;Police Foundation report showing Americans own some 192 million firearms, 65 million of which are handguns...&lt;/cite&gt;

Then why isn&#039;t gun violence even higher, if it really is the &lt;strong&gt;guns&lt;/strong&gt; fault?

As far as the NRA, consider the following, which you apparantly overlooked in your research:

&lt;cite&gt;&lt;dl&gt;Darrel Scott, father of Craig Scott, who watched two of his friends murdered at Columbine High School and Rachel Joy Scott (murdered in the same school after professing her faith in God), spoke before the Subcommittee on Crime House Judiciary Committee, United States House of Representatives, on Thursday, May 27, 1999, at 2:00p.m. at 2141 Rayburn House Office Building. The following is the speech he gave: 

&lt;dd&gt;Since the dawn of creation there has been both good and evil in the heart of men and of women.  We all contain the seeds of kindness or the seeds of violence. The death of my wonderful daughter Rachel Joy Scott, and the deaths of that heroic teacher and the other children who died must not be in vain.  Their blood cries out for answers. 

The first recorded act of violence was when Cain slew his brother Abel out in the field.  The villain was not the club he used. Neither was it the NCA, the National Club Association.  The true killer was Cain and the reason for the murder could only be found in Cain&#039;s heart. 

In the days that followed the Columbine tragedy, I was amazed at how quickly fingers began to be pointed at groups such as the NRA. I am not a member of the NRA.  I am not a hunter.  I do not even own a gun. I am not here to represent or defend the NRA - because I don&#039;t believe that they are responsible for my daughters death.  Therefore I do not believe that they need to be defended. If I believed they had anything to do with Rachel&#039;s murder I would be their strongest opponent. 

I am here today to declare that Columbine was not just a tragedy - it was a spiritual event that should be forcing us to look at where the real blame lies! Much of that blame lies here in this room.  Much of that blame lies behind the pointing fingers of the accusers themselves..... &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;&lt;/cite&gt;

And don&#039;t forget the near doubling of armed crimes that has taken place in England since the &quot;great gun ban&quot; of 1997. All of the Brady supplied statistics that cite England as a safer place thanks to gun control seem to stop before that point.

Gun control isn&#039;t about guns, it&#039;s about control. The state owes you no safety - the SCOTUS has ruled on that numerous times.

In recopgnition of that fact, I&#039;d rather have the means to defend myself and my family, thank you very much.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While your quote from the Utah parents is touching, I believe their &#8220;14 children a day&#8221; figure was a plant, courtesy of the Brady bunch et al, and includes suicides and juvenile gang bangers killed by police while committing crimes.</p>
<p>Not exactly a fair comparison to lawful gun ownership.</p>
<p>In addition, if the figures you use are correct:</p>
<p><cite>Police Foundation report showing Americans own some 192 million firearms, 65 million of which are handguns&#8230;</cite></p>
<p>Then why isn&#8217;t gun violence even higher, if it really is the <strong>guns</strong> fault?</p>
<p>As far as the NRA, consider the following, which you apparantly overlooked in your research:</p>
<p><cite>
<dl>Darrel Scott, father of Craig Scott, who watched two of his friends murdered at Columbine High School and Rachel Joy Scott (murdered in the same school after professing her faith in God), spoke before the Subcommittee on Crime House Judiciary Committee, United States House of Representatives, on Thursday, May 27, 1999, at 2:00p.m. at 2141 Rayburn House Office Building. The following is the speech he gave: </p>
<dd>Since the dawn of creation there has been both good and evil in the heart of men and of women.  We all contain the seeds of kindness or the seeds of violence. The death of my wonderful daughter Rachel Joy Scott, and the deaths of that heroic teacher and the other children who died must not be in vain.  Their blood cries out for answers. </p>
<p>The first recorded act of violence was when Cain slew his brother Abel out in the field.  The villain was not the club he used. Neither was it the NCA, the National Club Association.  The true killer was Cain and the reason for the murder could only be found in Cain&#8217;s heart. </p>
<p>In the days that followed the Columbine tragedy, I was amazed at how quickly fingers began to be pointed at groups such as the NRA. I am not a member of the NRA.  I am not a hunter.  I do not even own a gun. I am not here to represent or defend the NRA &#8211; because I don&#8217;t believe that they are responsible for my daughters death.  Therefore I do not believe that they need to be defended. If I believed they had anything to do with Rachel&#8217;s murder I would be their strongest opponent. </p>
<p>I am here today to declare that Columbine was not just a tragedy &#8211; it was a spiritual event that should be forcing us to look at where the real blame lies! Much of that blame lies here in this room.  Much of that blame lies behind the pointing fingers of the accusers themselves&#8230;.. </dd>
</dl>
<p></cite></p>
<p>And don&#8217;t forget the near doubling of armed crimes that has taken place in England since the &#8220;great gun ban&#8221; of 1997. All of the Brady supplied statistics that cite England as a safer place thanks to gun control seem to stop before that point.</p>
<p>Gun control isn&#8217;t about guns, it&#8217;s about control. The state owes you no safety &#8211; the SCOTUS has ruled on that numerous times.</p>
<p>In recopgnition of that fact, I&#8217;d rather have the means to defend myself and my family, thank you very much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
