<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s still anyone&#8217;s Presidential race</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/2182/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/2182</link>
	<description>The oldest political news site on the Internet because nobody&#039;s life, liberty or property is safe while Congress is in session.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:24:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy Price</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/2182/comment-page-1#comment-12253</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-12253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We get all the latest nonsense of what the RNC does not want but have they repaired this ridiculous platform or will they continue to lap up the religious right?

They want the prohibitions but do not have the spine to admit it.  The RNC has no plans for a Republican Party and are still hanging on to a desire for a Theocracy.  

Most still feel that individual freedoms are an excuse for living a sinful life.  I doubt that most Americans want a police state from D.C. and will vote Democratic instead of pushing for more Congressional legislation against sins.  

The GOP would be much smarter to expose their own deep seated corruption and find candidates who know right from wrong.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We get all the latest nonsense of what the RNC does not want but have they repaired this ridiculous platform or will they continue to lap up the religious right?</p>
<p>They want the prohibitions but do not have the spine to admit it.  The RNC has no plans for a Republican Party and are still hanging on to a desire for a Theocracy.  </p>
<p>Most still feel that individual freedoms are an excuse for living a sinful life.  I doubt that most Americans want a police state from D.C. and will vote Democratic instead of pushing for more Congressional legislation against sins.  </p>
<p>The GOP would be much smarter to expose their own deep seated corruption and find candidates who know right from wrong.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/2182/comment-page-1#comment-12261</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-12261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Romney has never changed his position on gay rights. He has been 100% consistent. The only stance he has changed on is abortion, which he freely admits. 

You should correct your story.

www.mymanmitt.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Romney has never changed his position on gay rights. He has been 100% consistent. The only stance he has changed on is abortion, which he freely admits. </p>
<p>You should correct your story.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mymanmitt.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mymanmitt.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy Price</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/2182/comment-page-1#comment-12265</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-12265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Romney is now against abortion, how far will he go to ban them?  This is a question that must be asked of all Candidates who claim to be pro-life.  Will he use a Constitutional Amendment to prohibit abortions as well as gay marriages and death with dignity to allow suicides to end a devastating and agonizing death?  i.e., how much government does he want over the wishes of the American people?  

The GOP brought this on and many of us want to know how far they will go to enforce their wishes?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Romney is now against abortion, how far will he go to ban them?  This is a question that must be asked of all Candidates who claim to be pro-life.  Will he use a Constitutional Amendment to prohibit abortions as well as gay marriages and death with dignity to allow suicides to end a devastating and agonizing death?  i.e., how much government does he want over the wishes of the American people?  </p>
<p>The GOP brought this on and many of us want to know how far they will go to enforce their wishes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEAL</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/2182/comment-page-1#comment-12280</link>
		<dc:creator>SEAL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-12280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does anyone in the party know?  The general public&#039;s view is that they are dishonest, incompetent, phonies, religious zealots or (e) all of the above.  But what does the die hard republican no matter what think their candidate must be?  Right now there seems to be no identity, therefore, there can be no candidate.

During the past 6 years they have lost their identity, consequently their support.  Bush is primarily responsible for that due to his incompetence.  But their congress is equally responsible for blindly following him. The only support left to them comes from the religious base and that is waning.  So, what is a republican?  That&#039;s what they have to figure out.

The last 6 years completely destroyed the time honored concept of what a republican was.  They proved themselves to be anything but that.  They became the &quot;religious&quot; party in order to win elections but reneged on those supporters.  The standard small government and fisical responsibility republican watched them create the largest bureauocracy in history and plunge the nation into bankruptcy.  The only ones the made happy were the gun rack in the pickup window set.  The war party seems to be the only identity left and they are failng at that.

The one part of their identity that has survived is being the big business party.  But that is no longer popular, even among the die hards.  The candidates are floundering around trying to hold some of the framents of the base together.  But they have no clear message for any of them.  The RNC, not the candidates, must write a completely new platform for the party and then find a candidate other than what is presently available to fill it.  Otherwise, the 2008 election will be the biggest blowout in history making the Johnson Goldwater vote look like a squeaker for Johnson.  And congress will be so blue they will have to redecorate. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone in the party know?  The general public&#8217;s view is that they are dishonest, incompetent, phonies, religious zealots or (e) all of the above.  But what does the die hard republican no matter what think their candidate must be?  Right now there seems to be no identity, therefore, there can be no candidate.</p>
<p>During the past 6 years they have lost their identity, consequently their support.  Bush is primarily responsible for that due to his incompetence.  But their congress is equally responsible for blindly following him. The only support left to them comes from the religious base and that is waning.  So, what is a republican?  That&#8217;s what they have to figure out.</p>
<p>The last 6 years completely destroyed the time honored concept of what a republican was.  They proved themselves to be anything but that.  They became the &#8220;religious&#8221; party in order to win elections but reneged on those supporters.  The standard small government and fisical responsibility republican watched them create the largest bureauocracy in history and plunge the nation into bankruptcy.  The only ones the made happy were the gun rack in the pickup window set.  The war party seems to be the only identity left and they are failng at that.</p>
<p>The one part of their identity that has survived is being the big business party.  But that is no longer popular, even among the die hards.  The candidates are floundering around trying to hold some of the framents of the base together.  But they have no clear message for any of them.  The RNC, not the candidates, must write a completely new platform for the party and then find a candidate other than what is presently available to fill it.  Otherwise, the 2008 election will be the biggest blowout in history making the Johnson Goldwater vote look like a squeaker for Johnson.  And congress will be so blue they will have to redecorate. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gloryb</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/2182/comment-page-1#comment-12337</link>
		<dc:creator>Gloryb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-12337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At first glance, this photo of Mitt Romney looked like a staged photo of Barbie&#039;s Ken-doll.  If the intention was to make him appear as a plastic wannabe, it was a success!  After I snickered at the picture, I read the article.  If the present &#039;Presidential&#039; candidates from both major parties, are the choices, I&#039;ll have to go by whichever is the least offensive, probably a Democrat. I don&#039;t trust anyone who proclaims himself a Republican regardless of level, local to national, we&#039;ve been screwed too many times at all these levels by the Greedy Old Politicians.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first glance, this photo of Mitt Romney looked like a staged photo of Barbie&#8217;s Ken-doll.  If the intention was to make him appear as a plastic wannabe, it was a success!  After I snickered at the picture, I read the article.  If the present &#8216;Presidential&#8217; candidates from both major parties, are the choices, I&#8217;ll have to go by whichever is the least offensive, probably a Democrat. I don&#8217;t trust anyone who proclaims himself a Republican regardless of level, local to national, we&#8217;ve been screwed too many times at all these levels by the Greedy Old Politicians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Nemo</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/2182/comment-page-1#comment-12366</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Nemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-12366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve listend to this guy on talkshows etc., and he comes across as too goody-two-shoes along with an all &quot;too wholesome&quot; delivery that immediately causes red flags go up.  To me he&#039;s just another Republican &quot;wolf in sheeps clothing&quot;. Take a look at the photo associated with this editorial and he&#039;s standing at the mike like one of those Sunday morning, mega-church, hit-in-the-butt with the bible type preachers. If the electorate foolishly puts him in office, they&#039;l find out they have nothing but Bushco in spades, except he will be using an endless stream of Godly euphemisms to further enslave us.  &quot;America doesn&#039;t need no stinkin&#039; preacherman&quot; types...Amen!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve listend to this guy on talkshows etc., and he comes across as too goody-two-shoes along with an all &#8220;too wholesome&#8221; delivery that immediately causes red flags go up.  To me he&#8217;s just another Republican &#8220;wolf in sheeps clothing&#8221;. Take a look at the photo associated with this editorial and he&#8217;s standing at the mike like one of those Sunday morning, mega-church, hit-in-the-butt with the bible type preachers. If the electorate foolishly puts him in office, they&#8217;l find out they have nothing but Bushco in spades, except he will be using an endless stream of Godly euphemisms to further enslave us.  &#8220;America doesn&#8217;t need no stinkin&#8217; preacherman&#8221; types&#8230;Amen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Nemo</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/2182/comment-page-1#comment-12369</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Nemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-12369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: Sandy Price and Jason concerning birth control etc. 

I realize abortion is an ugly story, and obviously unwanted pregnancy should be headed off before conception even occurs, but to the anti-abortion crowd I offer a link that might wake you up to the possibility that we are living in times of diminishing resources; i.e, arable land, potable freshwater supplies, and even our coastlines will diminish due to impending global warming causing the displacement or worse of 200 million people world-wide due to rising ocean levels. 

 Many if not most of these people that were conceived due to unwanted, ill-thought couplings are the poorest of the poor.  So Romney and his brethren need to glue their noses on this type of information and start thinking about their politically opportunistic publicly stated policies.  I believe Romny is Mormon and Mormon&#039;s like Catholics believe in having large families.  Catholics and Mormons are even against birth control which would head off the problem at the head end.  Just as the lower animal populations on occasion, humans are going to populate themselves out of their habitat. 

Are these are the kind of public policy-makers we need to elect in times of diminishing resources...?! :&#124;  If the American electorate continues to elect/re-elect these baby-kissing, chicken-in every-pot,  Ford-in-every-garage, religious based, shallow pols it will be their undoing for sure.

math.berkeley.edu/~galen/popclk.html
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Sandy Price and Jason concerning birth control etc. </p>
<p>I realize abortion is an ugly story, and obviously unwanted pregnancy should be headed off before conception even occurs, but to the anti-abortion crowd I offer a link that might wake you up to the possibility that we are living in times of diminishing resources; i.e, arable land, potable freshwater supplies, and even our coastlines will diminish due to impending global warming causing the displacement or worse of 200 million people world-wide due to rising ocean levels. </p>
<p> Many if not most of these people that were conceived due to unwanted, ill-thought couplings are the poorest of the poor.  So Romney and his brethren need to glue their noses on this type of information and start thinking about their politically opportunistic publicly stated policies.  I believe Romny is Mormon and Mormon&#8217;s like Catholics believe in having large families.  Catholics and Mormons are even against birth control which would head off the problem at the head end.  Just as the lower animal populations on occasion, humans are going to populate themselves out of their habitat. </p>
<p>Are these are the kind of public policy-makers we need to elect in times of diminishing resources&#8230;?! <img src='http://www.capitolhillblue.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_neutral.gif' alt=':|' class='wp-smiley' />   If the American electorate continues to elect/re-elect these baby-kissing, chicken-in every-pot,  Ford-in-every-garage, religious based, shallow pols it will be their undoing for sure.</p>
<p>math.berkeley.edu/~galen/popclk.html</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEAL</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/2182/comment-page-1#comment-12383</link>
		<dc:creator>SEAL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-12383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all know the reason for over population.  Stupidity.  And the fact is that it is already too late.  The world&#039;s climate is changing so as to be detrimental to the human race and there is nothing we can do to prevent it.  Large masses of people will have to migrate in a few years to survive and that will bring on chaos and conflict.  Death and destruction.  Humans by the millions will perish.  I know that nobody wants to hear this but that is the reality.

My people are not religious.  We understand that the sun is our supreme enity that, together with the earth, provides for all life.  Unfortunately, we are the very few who seem to respect that.  We have always tried to exist within natures framework instead of altering it.  But the human race has altered it.  

Nature, the sun and the earth, will now correct what the humans have done.  It will remove all or a sufficient number of those that created the problem - The humans.  The earth is in no danger.  We are.  So, arguing about abortion is nonconsequential and it is too late to address birth control even if the religions would allow it.

Those who accept and understand the reality will concentrate on survival.  Those who don&#039;t will die.  The rest of this century will be a cleansing of the planet.  Nature will establish a new order that may or may not include humans.  This is not the first time nature has altered the balance of the planet and it probably won&#039;t be the last.  So, I guess it makes no difference if people choose to waste the time they have left arguing about things that make no difference.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know the reason for over population.  Stupidity.  And the fact is that it is already too late.  The world&#8217;s climate is changing so as to be detrimental to the human race and there is nothing we can do to prevent it.  Large masses of people will have to migrate in a few years to survive and that will bring on chaos and conflict.  Death and destruction.  Humans by the millions will perish.  I know that nobody wants to hear this but that is the reality.</p>
<p>My people are not religious.  We understand that the sun is our supreme enity that, together with the earth, provides for all life.  Unfortunately, we are the very few who seem to respect that.  We have always tried to exist within natures framework instead of altering it.  But the human race has altered it.  </p>
<p>Nature, the sun and the earth, will now correct what the humans have done.  It will remove all or a sufficient number of those that created the problem &#8211; The humans.  The earth is in no danger.  We are.  So, arguing about abortion is nonconsequential and it is too late to address birth control even if the religions would allow it.</p>
<p>Those who accept and understand the reality will concentrate on survival.  Those who don&#8217;t will die.  The rest of this century will be a cleansing of the planet.  Nature will establish a new order that may or may not include humans.  This is not the first time nature has altered the balance of the planet and it probably won&#8217;t be the last.  So, I guess it makes no difference if people choose to waste the time they have left arguing about things that make no difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/2182/comment-page-1#comment-12458</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-12458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article neglects to mention Representative Dr. Ron Paul, who is by no small margin the best possible candidate for this country; Republican, Democrat, or otherwise.  Ron Paul is the only candidate who is scandal-free with a congressional record that reflects a concern for the citizens of this country and a respect for the U.S. Constitution. While he may not exactly be the frontrunner, neglecting to mention the one true standout in the GOP race (actually, the entire presidential race) is just poor journalism.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article neglects to mention Representative Dr. Ron Paul, who is by no small margin the best possible candidate for this country; Republican, Democrat, or otherwise.  Ron Paul is the only candidate who is scandal-free with a congressional record that reflects a concern for the citizens of this country and a respect for the U.S. Constitution. While he may not exactly be the frontrunner, neglecting to mention the one true standout in the GOP race (actually, the entire presidential race) is just poor journalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frofreak</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/2182/comment-page-1#comment-12482</link>
		<dc:creator>frofreak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-12482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Romney is a federalist.  He believes whole heartedly in the rights of the state to govern themselves.  In line with that, he will not seek a constitutional ammendment to ban or prohibit abortion.  He may seek to have Roe v. Wade overturned, and give the rights to determine abortion laws back to the states, but will not likely support measures to institute a federal law on the issue one way or the other.  On the marriage issue, he has said repeatedly that he would support an ammendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman, but again, he is an advocate for states rights, and would likely support a states right to intitute what civil union laws they wish.  On death with dignity, he has already publicly stated that he believes the government in florida was out of line getting involved in the terry shiavo case.  he believed in that case anyway, the government should not have been involved, it was between her and her family.  Again, he would support states rights in determining these laws, as they know best the needs of their citizens.  Don&#039;t know if this helps at all, and I can only speculate, obviously, as I am neither a spokesman for his campaign, not a psychic. And these are extremely complex issues, obviously I have not tried to delve to deep, but suffice it to say romney would leave these important decisions up to the states, with SOME federal guidance ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Romney is a federalist.  He believes whole heartedly in the rights of the state to govern themselves.  In line with that, he will not seek a constitutional ammendment to ban or prohibit abortion.  He may seek to have Roe v. Wade overturned, and give the rights to determine abortion laws back to the states, but will not likely support measures to institute a federal law on the issue one way or the other.  On the marriage issue, he has said repeatedly that he would support an ammendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman, but again, he is an advocate for states rights, and would likely support a states right to intitute what civil union laws they wish.  On death with dignity, he has already publicly stated that he believes the government in florida was out of line getting involved in the terry shiavo case.  he believed in that case anyway, the government should not have been involved, it was between her and her family.  Again, he would support states rights in determining these laws, as they know best the needs of their citizens.  Don&#8217;t know if this helps at all, and I can only speculate, obviously, as I am neither a spokesman for his campaign, not a psychic. And these are extremely complex issues, obviously I have not tried to delve to deep, but suffice it to say romney would leave these important decisions up to the states, with SOME federal guidance </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
