Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone

Obama pushes bank tax to cover bailout costs

By
January 16, 2010

President Barack Obama on Saturday pitched his proposed tax on banks to recover the cost of bailing them out during the financial crisis, saying if they can afford billions more in bonuses, they can pay back the taxpayers, too.

The banks and Republican lawmakers oppose the tax, which Obama announced this week.

“We’re going to pass this fee into law,” the president said in his weekly radio and Internet address.

Congress must approve the tax and that was not assured, given the immediate opposition from Republicans. Democrats also appeared in jeopardy of losing their 60-vote majority in the Senate, with Democrat Martha Coakley in an unexpectedly close race against Republican Scott Brown in Massachusetts to fill the seat held for decades by the late Democrat Edward M. Kennedy.

Brown opposes Obama’s bank tax. Obama was heading to Massachusetts on Sunday to campaign for Coakley.

The White House’s decision to use the weekly address to speak about the proposed tax instead of the U.S. response to the suffering and devastation caused by the earthquake in Haiti suggested one line of attack Obama would use against Brown on Sunday.

Obama spoke publicly about Haiti on Wednesday, Thursday and Friday; he was to do so again on Saturday.

The proposed 0.15 percent tax would last at least 10 years and generate about $90 billion over the decade, according to administration estimates. It would apply to about 50 of the nation’s biggest banks, those with more than $50 billion in assets, and include many institutions that accepted no money from the $700 financial industry bailout.

Obama said that although the banks were facing a “crisis of their own creation,” the “distasteful but necessary” taxpayer-funded bailout prevented an “even greater calamity for the country.”

Most of the banks have returned the money they borrowed, and Obama said that was “good news.”

“But as far as I’m concerned, it’s not good enough,” he said. “We want the taxpayers’ money back, and we’re going to collect every dime.”

Six of the biggest U.S. banks are on track to pay $150 billion in total executive compensation for 2009, slightly less than the record $164 billion in 2007 before the financial crisis struck, according to the New York state comptroller’s office.

Obama challenged those who say banks can’t afford the tax without passing the costs on to shareholders and customers.

“That’s hard to believe when there are reports that Wall Street is going to hand out more money in bonuses and compensation just this year than the cost of this fee over the next 10 years,” he said. “If the big financial firms can afford massive bonuses, they can afford to pay back the American people.”

___

On the Net:

Obama address: http://www.whitehouse.gov

One Response to Obama pushes bank tax to cover bailout costs

  1. AustinRanter

    January 16, 2010 at 3:32 pm

    I think in the grander scheme of things, the tax is laughable.  The banks still have the legislative authority to continue to gamble with the taxpayer’s and customer’s money as much today as before the crash and bailout.

    Given that the legislative Acts are still in force, the tax will just piss off the banks and they will retaliate “legally”…and suck the life out of both their patrons and the taxpayers.  In fact, they’ll gamble our money in such a way that will endanger their existence and the government will bail them out again.

    Taxing the banks is a joke.  Wanna wipe a smile off of their faces?  Repeal the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 and the Commodities and Futures Modernization Act of 2000…and an overhaul of the Communities Reinvestment Act of 1995.  I promise you that would shut down their criminal business behaviors and frost the CEO’s asses at the same time.