<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Hillary Clinton paradox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/2137/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/2137</link>
	<description>The oldest political news site on the Internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 00:21:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: no name</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/2137/comment-page-1#comment-12232</link>
		<dc:creator>no name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-12232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t care what tripe comes out by writers seeking to sway voters to vote for Senator Clinton.  She is a loser. If she is nominated, she will not have my vote. The reason--her approach to the misfortune of giving full power to an idiot to wage war in Iraq. Other reasons, her avoidance of discussing anything that is on the front table. She is manipulating the American people for the sake of winning and she thinks she is in it to win it because she can salt away millions upon millions of dollars from donors, many of them friends of Bill and THAT WILL MAKE HER WIN.

Not for me. I have had enough of avoidance, spinning, obfuscation from the idiot in the WH. I have had enough of this.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care what tripe comes out by writers seeking to sway voters to vote for Senator Clinton.  She is a loser. If she is nominated, she will not have my vote. The reason&#8211;her approach to the misfortune of giving full power to an idiot to wage war in Iraq. Other reasons, her avoidance of discussing anything that is on the front table. She is manipulating the American people for the sake of winning and she thinks she is in it to win it because she can salt away millions upon millions of dollars from donors, many of them friends of Bill and THAT WILL MAKE HER WIN.</p>
<p>Not for me. I have had enough of avoidance, spinning, obfuscation from the idiot in the WH. I have had enough of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne K Dolik</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/2137/comment-page-1#comment-12245</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne K Dolik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-12245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Basically, I am seeing two groups of people that represent the soul of the American people. The First group is in the Republican camp. These are the folks that represent traditional Republicans. They want to save the Constitution, have limited Government, and return to fiscal responsibility. Herein, lies the fight for the soul of the Republican Party. Then there is the Neo-Cons. The outsiders are Paul and Hagel, if you want change.

The second group is in the camp of the Democrats. These folks are known as the Progressive Democrats. The Progressives stand for individual freedom. They are against war. The Progressives are not big fans of Hillary. They prefer Obama and Edwards. The Progressives did not fare as well in the general election last November. The Democratic Party didnâ€™t give the Progressives very much cash, as most of it was given to the establishment limousine liberals. Then there is the Limousine liberals like Hillary.

So, where are we? The money interests support the Limousine Liberals if you are a Democrat. And, if you are a Republican the money interests support the Neo-Cons. So there we have it; two anointed established hand selected candidates by the money interests.

So deal or no deal? Do you want coffee or tea? Hillary or Rudy? It is time Americans take their voting rights seriously. Vote none of the above. Wake up America, there is a choice and you must make it! 
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basically, I am seeing two groups of people that represent the soul of the American people. The First group is in the Republican camp. These are the folks that represent traditional Republicans. They want to save the Constitution, have limited Government, and return to fiscal responsibility. Herein, lies the fight for the soul of the Republican Party. Then there is the Neo-Cons. The outsiders are Paul and Hagel, if you want change.</p>
<p>The second group is in the camp of the Democrats. These folks are known as the Progressive Democrats. The Progressives stand for individual freedom. They are against war. The Progressives are not big fans of Hillary. They prefer Obama and Edwards. The Progressives did not fare as well in the general election last November. The Democratic Party didnâ€™t give the Progressives very much cash, as most of it was given to the establishment limousine liberals. Then there is the Limousine liberals like Hillary.</p>
<p>So, where are we? The money interests support the Limousine Liberals if you are a Democrat. And, if you are a Republican the money interests support the Neo-Cons. So there we have it; two anointed established hand selected candidates by the money interests.</p>
<p>So deal or no deal? Do you want coffee or tea? Hillary or Rudy? It is time Americans take their voting rights seriously. Vote none of the above. Wake up America, there is a choice and you must make it! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter F. Wouk</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/2137/comment-page-1#comment-12254</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter F. Wouk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-12254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just another pro-Hillary &quot;puff piece.&quot; Ya seen one, ya seen &#039;em all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just another pro-Hillary &#8220;puff piece.&#8221; Ya seen one, ya seen &#8216;em all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ealph Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/2137/comment-page-1#comment-12257</link>
		<dc:creator>Ealph Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-12257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is basically a matter of trust, or mistrust in the case of Hilary Clinton.  The Clinton machine has been an effective force in allowing the transnational corporations to continue their growth and accumulation of power over all people&#039;s lives -- both here and around the world, while at the same time convincing people that they really care about them and their common everyday problems -- you know jobs and food and stuff like that.  They are as effective at lying (maybe better) than the Chief Chimp.  They may be better because the Chief is trying to lie from such an extreme position, while the Clintons only have to distract you a little bit while their rich and powerful friends rob you from behind.

I do not trust her.  It is that simple. She is plying the &quot;woman&quot; card because it sells -- not because it means anything.  Women can be mean, manipulative and lie through their bright teeth as well as anyone.  What does she believe it and what does her actual behavior demonstrate?  Power and the lust for power is what I have seen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is basically a matter of trust, or mistrust in the case of Hilary Clinton.  The Clinton machine has been an effective force in allowing the transnational corporations to continue their growth and accumulation of power over all people&#8217;s lives &#8212; both here and around the world, while at the same time convincing people that they really care about them and their common everyday problems &#8212; you know jobs and food and stuff like that.  They are as effective at lying (maybe better) than the Chief Chimp.  They may be better because the Chief is trying to lie from such an extreme position, while the Clintons only have to distract you a little bit while their rich and powerful friends rob you from behind.</p>
<p>I do not trust her.  It is that simple. She is plying the &#8220;woman&#8221; card because it sells &#8212; not because it means anything.  Women can be mean, manipulative and lie through their bright teeth as well as anyone.  What does she believe it and what does her actual behavior demonstrate?  Power and the lust for power is what I have seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
