<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ye gads! Fox is top cable news channel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/21160/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/21160</link>
	<description>The oldest political news site on the Internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:29:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: almandine</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/21160/comment-page-1#comment-50933</link>
		<dc:creator>almandine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-50933</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;In a nutshell, yeah, except that it&#039;s not a Wall Street Plot, it&#039;s a truly leftist takeover attempt using the largesse of govt as a way to bankrupt the country (read middle class) so as to redistribute the wealth &quot;fairly&quot;.   You have TOO much, so give it to them. What&#039;s interesting in the link(s) I provided is the strong hand of ACORN, SEIU, Obama - and his organizing ilk - moving the checkers around the board.&#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&#160;Haven&#039;t we ALL wondered.. &quot;why are they taking our country deeper, deeper, and deeper in to debt without ANY ability to pay the money back? What are those fools thinking?&quot;&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The reason it&#039;s related to the current thread is that the talking heads, for whom you seem to have little use, are using that frame of reference and others of similar principle for their diatribes against the left, the crimepols, healthcare reform, cap-and-tax, TARP gone wild, etc. They have the platform for much of what you and I would say, given the chance; i.e., the last I checked, we rant likewise here.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Except for the Republican thing, which is the only political roadblock in DC - and thus the only turn-to in the short run, our views seem pretty consistent with Beck&#039;s, just to pick one of them. Google Beck and Cloward-Piven just for starters.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s become too trendy to support any of these talking heads publicly, but when the spotlight shuts down and the principles are sorted through, it&#039;s theirs - and not Obama&#039;s, Pelosi&#039;s, Reid&#039;s... you pick the politician - that you&#039;ll find yourself leaning toward... seriously. And whatever their personal motives you think you discern, it&#039;s the relative outcome I think we should ponder.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I say whatever they can do to thwart the current &quot;Chains we can believe in&quot;... that are headed our way, GO FOR IT!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&#160;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a nutshell, yeah, except that it&#8217;s not a Wall Street Plot, it&#8217;s a truly leftist takeover attempt using the largesse of govt as a way to bankrupt the country (read middle class) so as to redistribute the wealth &#8220;fairly&#8221;.   You have TOO much, so give it to them. What&#8217;s interesting in the link(s) I provided is the strong hand of ACORN, SEIU, Obama &#8211; and his organizing ilk &#8211; moving the checkers around the board.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;Haven&#8217;t we ALL wondered.. &#8220;why are they taking our country deeper, deeper, and deeper in to debt without ANY ability to pay the money back? What are those fools thinking?&#8221;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p>
<p>The reason it&#8217;s related to the current thread is that the talking heads, for whom you seem to have little use, are using that frame of reference and others of similar principle for their diatribes against the left, the crimepols, healthcare reform, cap-and-tax, TARP gone wild, etc. They have the platform for much of what you and I would say, given the chance; i.e., the last I checked, we rant likewise here.</p>
<p>Except for the Republican thing, which is the only political roadblock in DC &#8211; and thus the only turn-to in the short run, our views seem pretty consistent with Beck&#8217;s, just to pick one of them. Google Beck and Cloward-Piven just for starters.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s become too trendy to support any of these talking heads publicly, but when the spotlight shuts down and the principles are sorted through, it&#8217;s theirs &#8211; and not Obama&#8217;s, Pelosi&#8217;s, Reid&#8217;s&#8230; you pick the politician &#8211; that you&#8217;ll find yourself leaning toward&#8230; seriously. And whatever their personal motives you think you discern, it&#8217;s the relative outcome I think we should ponder.</p>
<p>I say whatever they can do to thwart the current &#8220;Chains we can believe in&#8221;&#8230; that are headed our way, GO FOR IT!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Nemo</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/21160/comment-page-1#comment-50941</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Nemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-50941</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Sandra, I&#039;ll check out the title.&#160; I haven&#039;t had a chance to get back to RR since posting some comments yesterday.&#160; I&#039;ll do so now.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Happy New Year 2010...! : )&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Carl Nemo **==&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Sandra, I&#8217;ll check out the title.&nbsp; I haven&#8217;t had a chance to get back to RR since posting some comments yesterday.&nbsp; I&#8217;ll do so now.</p>
<p>Happy New Year 2010&#8230;! : )</p>
<p>Carl Nemo **==</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: griff</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/21160/comment-page-1#comment-50950</link>
		<dc:creator>griff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-50950</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ha. I probably could, but I actually mean what I write.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for the Cloward-Piven strategy, it seems to be wildly successful. Kind of how communism was introduced in Russia. A supposed &quot;people&#039;s movement&quot; financed by Wall Street and London that used the people themselves as a springboard to totalitarian government.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha. I probably could, but I actually mean what I write.</p>
<p>As for the Cloward-Piven strategy, it seems to be wildly successful. Kind of how communism was introduced in Russia. A supposed &#8220;people&#8217;s movement&#8221; financed by Wall Street and London that used the people themselves as a springboard to totalitarian government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CynthiaK2</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/21160/comment-page-1#comment-50951</link>
		<dc:creator>CynthiaK2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-50951</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Comcast offers a Digital Starter package for $60 a month, which includes MSNBC.&#160; I have the Digital Economy package ($30), which includes Fox cable but not MSNBC.&#160;&#160; Your skepticism can be verified by contacting Comcast in the western Massachusetts viewing area.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fox broadcast network is in dispute with Time Warner, not Fox cable.&#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&#160;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comcast offers a Digital Starter package for $60 a month, which includes MSNBC.&nbsp; I have the Digital Economy package ($30), which includes Fox cable but not MSNBC.&nbsp;&nbsp; Your skepticism can be verified by contacting Comcast in the western Massachusetts viewing area.</p>
<p>Fox broadcast network is in dispute with Time Warner, not Fox cable.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: almandine</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/21160/comment-page-1#comment-50952</link>
		<dc:creator>almandine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-50952</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Comcast is not the ONLY game in town (the country)... and contacting Comcast in western Mass would surely not be definitive for the entire country, would it? Show me real numbers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I didn&#039;t say FOX cable, I was talking about TIME Warner removing FOX News from its cable offerings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And my point about FOX having twice the viewership of the other news networks was related mostly to MSNBC, because - as the link shows - CNN competes well (#2) in some ratings, although FOX still leads ALL of them in market share. Do you get CNN?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I personally think the reason MSNBC falls short is the common perception that they are nothing more than shills for the White House. Ever listen to Chuck Todd? Boy, what a suck-up.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comcast is not the ONLY game in town (the country)&#8230; and contacting Comcast in western Mass would surely not be definitive for the entire country, would it? Show me real numbers.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t say FOX cable, I was talking about TIME Warner removing FOX News from its cable offerings.</p>
<p>And my point about FOX having twice the viewership of the other news networks was related mostly to MSNBC, because &#8211; as the link shows &#8211; CNN competes well (#2) in some ratings, although FOX still leads ALL of them in market share. Do you get CNN?</p>
<p>I personally think the reason MSNBC falls short is the common perception that they are nothing more than shills for the White House. Ever listen to Chuck Todd? Boy, what a suck-up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: byreen</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/21160/comment-page-1#comment-50954</link>
		<dc:creator>byreen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-50954</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You got it Griff, Murdoch/Rush etc, are laughing their ass off as the band of merry ditto heads trash the fourth estate. For those that believe the few morsels of fact spewed by these figureheads are not wrapped in sinister underlying lies to manipulate and usurp our right to honest representation of the facts proves main street mentality is defunct. Damn, the Nazi&#039;s would be proud.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You got it Griff, Murdoch/Rush etc, are laughing their ass off as the band of merry ditto heads trash the fourth estate. For those that believe the few morsels of fact spewed by these figureheads are not wrapped in sinister underlying lies to manipulate and usurp our right to honest representation of the facts proves main street mentality is defunct. Damn, the Nazi&#8217;s would be proud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: almandine</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/21160/comment-page-1#comment-50955</link>
		<dc:creator>almandine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-50955</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;And here I thought you actually wrote for Beck.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;OK, calm down, just a Joke!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But on a related front, what do you think of the Cloward-Piven strategy?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6967&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And here I thought you actually wrote for Beck.</p>
<p>OK, calm down, just a Joke!</p>
<p>But on a related front, what do you think of the Cloward-Piven strategy?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6967" rel="nofollow">http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6967</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: griff</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/21160/comment-page-1#comment-50970</link>
		<dc:creator>griff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-50970</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Those points of departure are the reason I can&#039;t stomach Rush, et al. Actually I stopped watching televised news almost two years ago, but I mostly watched MSNBC prior.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I recall MSNBC cancelling both Phil Donahue&#039;s show and Jesse Ventura&#039;s show during the Iraq propaganda campaign because they were opposed. They went so far as paying Ventura&#039;s three year contract so he couldn&#039;t go to another outlet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I also recall Fox&#039;s treatment of Ron Paul during the primaries. Now all of a sudden they&#039;ve taken up his very causes? While their rhetoric may be attractive to many, I for one realize their game and refuse to play it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They&#039;re just herding people back to the Republicans, and I&#039;m afraid they&#039;re being quite successful. Glenn Beck has become some kind of cult hero with his false libertarian bent and bipolar rhetoric. It pains me to see the kind of following he&#039;s attracted.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&#160;&#160;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those points of departure are the reason I can&#8217;t stomach Rush, et al. Actually I stopped watching televised news almost two years ago, but I mostly watched MSNBC prior.</p>
<p>I recall MSNBC cancelling both Phil Donahue&#8217;s show and Jesse Ventura&#8217;s show during the Iraq propaganda campaign because they were opposed. They went so far as paying Ventura&#8217;s three year contract so he couldn&#8217;t go to another outlet.</p>
<p>I also recall Fox&#8217;s treatment of Ron Paul during the primaries. Now all of a sudden they&#8217;ve taken up his very causes? While their rhetoric may be attractive to many, I for one realize their game and refuse to play it.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re just herding people back to the Republicans, and I&#8217;m afraid they&#8217;re being quite successful. Glenn Beck has become some kind of cult hero with his false libertarian bent and bipolar rhetoric. It pains me to see the kind of following he&#8217;s attracted.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandra Price</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/21160/comment-page-1#comment-50980</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-50980</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Carl, on R.R. Slipped Mickey has suggested a book that might be of interest to this subject.&#160; Empire of Illusion is the title by Chris Hedges.&#160; Many are ordering it.&#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sandy&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carl, on R.R. Slipped Mickey has suggested a book that might be of interest to this subject.&nbsp; Empire of Illusion is the title by Chris Hedges.&nbsp; Many are ordering it.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Sandy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acf</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/21160/comment-page-1#comment-50981</link>
		<dc:creator>acf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-50981</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Absolutely. In my market of greater Boston, MA, the 3 primary stations run 60 to 90 minutes of half hour news programs starting between 5:00 PM and 6:00 PM. The majority of time consists of teasers to get you to come back after the commercial, and hopefully when the next 30 minute program starts. Incidently, many of the commercials are, believe it or not, ads for the station&#039;s news program. Next, there are the inevitible celebrity &#039;news items&#039; that end with a &quot;You can see more about this on the XYZ Show, tonight on our station&quot;. Add in the daily animal story flavor of the month (bears in the winter, and sharks in the summer), and you can see that there isn&#039;t much time for any serious coverage of the news that&#039;s important. And don&#039;t get me started about the giggling &quot;happy talk&quot;, that makes the whole thing sound like it&#039;s for and by 12 year old girls.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely. In my market of greater Boston, MA, the 3 primary stations run 60 to 90 minutes of half hour news programs starting between 5:00 PM and 6:00 PM. The majority of time consists of teasers to get you to come back after the commercial, and hopefully when the next 30 minute program starts. Incidently, many of the commercials are, believe it or not, ads for the station&#8217;s news program. Next, there are the inevitible celebrity &#8216;news items&#8217; that end with a &#8220;You can see more about this on the XYZ Show, tonight on our station&#8221;. Add in the daily animal story flavor of the month (bears in the winter, and sharks in the summer), and you can see that there isn&#8217;t much time for any serious coverage of the news that&#8217;s important. And don&#8217;t get me started about the giggling &#8220;happy talk&#8221;, that makes the whole thing sound like it&#8217;s for and by 12 year old girls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

