The brazen attack that killed seven CIA employees at a remote outpost in Afghanistan is likely to raise questions about whether the agency could do more to protect its operatives on dangerous assignments.
Lawmakers on Thursday issued their condolences and withheld any judgment. But officials said they expected an eventual inquiry as to whether the CIA should re-examine how it deploys individuals in hostile regions and the lengths operatives are allowed to go to get information.
“We owe these brave men and women, and their families who are forever impacted, our deepest appreciation and thanks,” said Rep. Silvestre Reyes, D-Texas, the House Intelligence Committee chairman who had met with the CIA team on a recent trip to Afghanistan.
Wednesday’s bombing was a devastating blow to the tightknit spy community. Among the seven CIA employees killed was the chief of the CIA post, whom former officials identified as a mother of three. Six more agency personnel were wounded in what was considered the most lethal attack for the CIA since the war in Afghanistan began in 2001 and possibly even since the 1983 embassy bombing in Beirut.
The bombing occurred at a former military base on the edge of Khost city, the capital of Khost province, which borders Pakistan and is a Taliban stronghold.
The Taliban claimed responsibility, with a spokesman saying the bomber had been an Afghan National Army officer who blew himself up inside a gym at the base. U.S. officials would not confirm that the bomber had been a member of the Afghan army, leaving open the possibility that the uniform had been stolen.
Two former U.S. officials told The Associated Press that the man had been invited onto the base and had not been searched. One of the officials, a former senior intelligence employee, said the man was being courted as an informant and that it was the first time he had been brought inside the camp.
Another U.S. official, a former CIA employee, said it’s not uncommon for an operative to forgo additional security if it means gaining a potential informant’s trust.
“When you’re trying to build a rapport and literally ask them to risk his life for you, you’ve got a lot to do to build their trust,” the former employee said.
President Barack Obama and CIA Director Leon Panetta were joined by several leading lawmakers on Thursday in praising agency employees for their work.
“Those who fell yesterday were far from home and close to the enemy, doing the hard work that must be done to protect our country from terrorism,” Panetta said Thursday in a statement confirming the deaths. “We owe them our deepest gratitude, and we pledge to them and their families that we will never cease fighting for the cause to which they dedicated their lives — a safer America.”
In a letter to CIA employees, Obama said their fallen colleagues came from a “long line of patriots” who had helped to keep the nation safe despite grave risks.
Harold E. Brown Jr. of Fairfax, Va., was among the dead, according to his father, Harold E. Brown Sr. The elder Brown said his 37-year-old son, who grew up in Bolton, Mass., served in the Army and worked for the State Department. He is survived by a wife and three children ages 12, 10 and 2.
The CIA did not release information about the victims, citing the sensitivity of their mission and other ongoing operations.
___
Associated Press writers Adam Goldman in New York City, and Pamela Hess and Matthew Lee in Washington contributed to this report.
© 2010, ↑ Capitol Hill Blue
Capitol Hill Blue: The oldest political news site on the Internet -- Established October 1, 1994
Carl Nemo
January 2, 2010 at 1:42 pm
“The Taliban claimed responsibility, with a spokesman saying the bomber had been an Afghan National Army officer who blew himself up inside a gym at the base. U.S. officials would not confirm that the bomber had been a member of the Afghan army, leaving open the possibility that the uniform had been stolen.” …extract from article
Rest assured the ‘stolen uniform’ story shall stand. Our SOD Robert Gates just earmarked 7.5 Billion dollars for the purpose of training Afghani’s to defend their country!?
So in the event an Afghani National Army officer comes up missing on the morning muster this would not be supportive for such ongoing aid.
When I heard about this phenomenal amount of U.S. taxpayer money being pitched down this Afghani rathole, I almost upchucked. Karzai and brothers are anothing but plug-in modules being utlized by our ever-bumbling CIA to destabilize or in this case to stabilize countries for the benefit of the MIC and the “oil patch”. They’re playing around with the Afghani cobra and now they’ve been bitten, “bigtime”!
Here’s a link to “Karzai family secrets” link
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-09-27/heroin-kingpin-or-hero/?cid=hp:featureline
This second link content, Iraq theater, is outstanding in that it demonstrates the b.s. our G.I.’s must suffer in trying to ‘train’ foreign nationals to supress their own people. They are training men that will potentially slit their throats or backshoot them given the chance. General McChrystal says he wants our guys to get more personal with the Afghani’s; ie., get to know them in a “down home” aw shucks sense I guess. Wut da f***!? There’s an old saying, “familiarity breeds contempt”…no?
U.S. soldier chews out Iraqi police link
http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/05/tough-love-us-soldier-chews-out-iraqi-police/comment-page-1/
My condolences go out to the families of the agency personnel that lost their lives, but as far as the “company” they worked for, I have grave reservations at this point in our national history. We’ve met the enemy and evidently he is us…!
Carl Nemo **==
issodhos
January 1, 2010 at 1:44 pm
That question is about as silly as asking the military why it cannot protect its own GIs when they are in a war zone. There are occupations that include inherent risk of death. Both covert and overt CIA operations in hostile environments involve such occupations.
Yours,
Issodhos